skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State
Public attention to climate change challenges our locked-in fossil fuel-dependent energy sector. Natural gas is replacing other fossil fuels in our energy mix. One way to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of fossil natural gas is to replace it with renewable natural gas (RNG). The benefits of utilizing RNG are that it has no climate change impact when combusted and utilized in the same applications as fossil natural gas. RNG can be injected into the gas grid, used as a transportation fuel, or used for heating and electricity generation. Less common applications include utilizing RNG to produce chemicals, such as methanol, dimethyl ether, and ammonia. The GHG impact should be quantified before committing to RNG. This study quantifies the potential production of biogas (i.e., the precursor to RNG) and RNG from agricultural and waste sources in New York State (NYS). It is unique because it is the first study to provide this analysis. The results showed that only about 10% of the state’s resources are used to generate biogas, of which a small fraction is processed to RNG on the only two operational RNG facilities in the state. The impact of incorporating a second renewable substitute for fossil natural gas, “green” hydrogen, is also analyzed. It revealed that injecting RNG and “green” hydrogen gas into the pipeline system can reduce up to 20% of the state’s carbon emissions resulting from fossil natural gas usage, which is a significant GHG reduction. Policy analysis for NYS shows that several state and federal policies support RNG production. However, the value of RNG can be increased 10-fold by applying a similar incentive policy to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS).  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1633299
PAR ID:
10253320
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Energies
Volume:
14
Issue:
13
ISSN:
1996-1073
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3834
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Garcia-Perez, Manuel (Ed.)
    Renewable natural gas (RNG) often generates usable energy from waste products, reduces methane emissions, and creates new revenue streams. However, not all RNG projects are financially or technically feasible. We assessed the total RNG potential of currently available local waste feedstocks in the state of Minnesota and analyzed the financial and technical limitations for project development. We found that under ideal production conditions the RNG potential from municipal solid waste, dairy and hog farm manure, and municipal wastewater solids in the state could replace approximately 7.5% of current Minnesota natural gas use. We find that technical and financial factors such as project size, financing, and distance to an existing pipeline further reduce the number of feasible RNG project sites in Minnesota. Virtual pipelines – trucking RNG short distances to pipeline injection stations – improved the modeled profitability of 124 out of 175 projects (71%) by decreasing transmission costs. No projects are financially feasible without state or federal renewable fuel credit programs because direct sale of RNG alone does not cover project costs. Dairy manure projects have the lowest levelized cost of energy, the highest total revenue, and the shortest payback period compared to municipal solid waste landfill and wastewater treatment plant projects of similar size. This difference is because manure anaerobic digestion projects are eligible for larger credits under renewable fuel credit programs than municipal solid waste landfills and wastewater treatment plants, but this credit system limits end-use of the RNG to vehicle fuel. Our contribution helps provide an outline for the magnitude of current natural gas use in Minnesota replaceable via RNG projects. 
    more » « less
  2. To meet 2050 decarbonization goals, Massachusetts will not be able to rely on carbon intensive energy sources (e.g. natural gas and gasoline) and hydrogen has been considered a replacement. To produce hydrogen without carbon emissions, renewable energy sources will be used to power electrolyzer stacks. However, renewable energy sources will also be in high demand for other energy sectors, such as automobiles and electrification. This paper estimates the amount of wind energy needed to replace natural gas with hydrogen and electrify automobiles. Comparisons are also made for a scenario in which heat pumps are used to replace natural gas. These energy sectors represent the bulk of energy consumed within Massachusetts and are of high interest to stakeholders globally. The analysis reveals the daunting amount of wind energy needed for replacement and that it is highly unlikely for hydrogen to replace natural gas in time to meet the state’s climate goals. 
    more » « less
  3. A vehicular adsorbed natural gas (ANG) tank system operates as a mobile, dual gas storage/separation system to enable off-the-natural-gas-grid producers of biogas to use, ship, and process biogas for: (a) onboard delivery to engine of on-demand delivery of methane-rich fuel to an internal-combustion engine; (b) onboard separation of methane from carbon dioxide and extraction of unused fuel as carbon-dioxide-rich commodity, and (c) and large-scale, tractor-trailer shipping of biogas to a biogas upgrading plant and separation of methane from carbon dioxide during discharge at the plant. A mobile tank system on a vehicle comprises vessels filled with porous adsorbent and pressure valves; pressure regulators; pressure/temperature transducers at inlet, outlet, intermediate ports; and an onboard compressor/gas extraction pump. The tank discharging procedure for the separation of biogas into methane and carbon dioxide is such that the concentration of methane in discharged gas is at least 10% greater than in biogas. 
    more » « less
  4. Anthropogenic activities are responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, causing extreme events like soil erosion, droughts, floods, forest fires and tornadoes. Fossil fuel consumption produces CO2, and trapping heat is the major reason for a rapid increase in global temperature, and electricity generation is responsible for 25% of greenhouse gas emissions. Fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and their adverse impact have become the focus of efforts to mitigate climate change vulnerability. This study explores empirical determinants of vulnerability to climate change such as ecosystem, food, health and infrastructure. The sustainable use of energy is necessary for development, and a source of response to climate change. The present study focuses on renewable energy consumption to determine climate vulnerability in G7 countries between 1995 and 2019. The panel ARDL approach showed that the renewable to non-renewable energy mix showed a quadratic effect on vulnerability, whereby a minimum threshold of renewable energy is required to witness a reduction in food, health and infrastructure vulnerability. Other results indicate that trade openness and development expenditures reduce health vulnerability. Development expenditures also decrease ecosystem vulnerability, while trade openness increases it. However, both of these variables increase infrastructure vulnerability. Avoiding severe food and water crises requires investment to tackle climate change, conserve energy and water resources, reform global trade and food markets, and adapting and adopting climate-resilient responses to change. 
    more » « less
  5. Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause and effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO2) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO2 emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources. 
    more » « less