skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Role of Energy Mix in Determining Climate Change Vulnerability in G7 Countries
Anthropogenic activities are responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, causing extreme events like soil erosion, droughts, floods, forest fires and tornadoes. Fossil fuel consumption produces CO2, and trapping heat is the major reason for a rapid increase in global temperature, and electricity generation is responsible for 25% of greenhouse gas emissions. Fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and their adverse impact have become the focus of efforts to mitigate climate change vulnerability. This study explores empirical determinants of vulnerability to climate change such as ecosystem, food, health and infrastructure. The sustainable use of energy is necessary for development, and a source of response to climate change. The present study focuses on renewable energy consumption to determine climate vulnerability in G7 countries between 1995 and 2019. The panel ARDL approach showed that the renewable to non-renewable energy mix showed a quadratic effect on vulnerability, whereby a minimum threshold of renewable energy is required to witness a reduction in food, health and infrastructure vulnerability. Other results indicate that trade openness and development expenditures reduce health vulnerability. Development expenditures also decrease ecosystem vulnerability, while trade openness increases it. However, both of these variables increase infrastructure vulnerability. Avoiding severe food and water crises requires investment to tackle climate change, conserve energy and water resources, reform global trade and food markets, and adapting and adopting climate-resilient responses to change.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1757207
PAR ID:
10316641
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Sustainability
Volume:
14
Issue:
4
ISSN:
2071-1050
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Nature Communications)
    Irrigation reduces crop vulnerability to drought and heat stress and thus is a promising climate change adaptation strategy. However, irrigation also produces greenhouse gas emissions through pump energy use. To assess potential conflicts between adaptive irrigation expansion and agricultural emissions mitigation efforts, we calculated county-level emissions from irrigation energy use in the US using fuel expenditures, prices, and emissions factors. Irrigation pump energy use produced 12.6 million metric tonnes CO2-e in the US in 2018 (90% CI: 10.4, 15.0), predominantly attributable to groundwater pumping. Groundwater reliance, irrigated area extent, water demand, fuel choice, and electrical grid emissions intensity drove spatial heterogeneity in emissions. Due to heavy reliance on electrical pumps, projected reductions in electrical grid emissions intensity are estimated to reduce pumping emissions by 46% by 2050, with further reductions possible through pump electrification. Quantification of irrigation-related emissions will enable targeted emissions reduction efforts and climate-smart irrigation expansion. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Energies)
    null (Ed.)
    Public attention to climate change challenges our locked-in fossil fuel-dependent energy sector. Natural gas is replacing other fossil fuels in our energy mix. One way to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of fossil natural gas is to replace it with renewable natural gas (RNG). The benefits of utilizing RNG are that it has no climate change impact when combusted and utilized in the same applications as fossil natural gas. RNG can be injected into the gas grid, used as a transportation fuel, or used for heating and electricity generation. Less common applications include utilizing RNG to produce chemicals, such as methanol, dimethyl ether, and ammonia. The GHG impact should be quantified before committing to RNG. This study quantifies the potential production of biogas (i.e., the precursor to RNG) and RNG from agricultural and waste sources in New York State (NYS). It is unique because it is the first study to provide this analysis. The results showed that only about 10% of the state’s resources are used to generate biogas, of which a small fraction is processed to RNG on the only two operational RNG facilities in the state. The impact of incorporating a second renewable substitute for fossil natural gas, “green” hydrogen, is also analyzed. It revealed that injecting RNG and “green” hydrogen gas into the pipeline system can reduce up to 20% of the state’s carbon emissions resulting from fossil natural gas usage, which is a significant GHG reduction. Policy analysis for NYS shows that several state and federal policies support RNG production. However, the value of RNG can be increased 10-fold by applying a similar incentive policy to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Nature Communications)
    Abstract Air quality associated public health co-benefit may emerge from climate and energy policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the distribution of these co-benefits has not been carefully studied, despite the opportunity to tailor mitigation efforts so they achieve maximum benefits within socially and economically disadvantaged communities (DACs). Here, we quantify such health co-benefits from different long-term, low-carbon scenarios in California and their distribution in the context of social vulnerability. The magnitude and distribution of health benefits, including within impacted communities, is found to varies among scenarios which reduce economy wide GHG emissions by 80% in 2050 depending on the technology- and fuel-switching decisions in individual end-use sectors. The building electrification focused decarbonization strategy achieves ~15% greater total health benefits than the truck electrification focused strategy which uses renewable fuels to meet building demands. Conversely, the enhanced electrification of the truck sector is shown to benefit DACs more effectively. Such tradeoffs highlight the importance of considering environmental justice implications in the development of climate mitigation planning. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Cleaner engineering and technology)
    The escalating challenges posed by extreme climate change and the rapid greenhouse effect have heightened stress and urgency among governments, researchers, and the public. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), have signi昀椀cantly contributed to rising atmospheric temperatures, with agriculture, forestry, and industrial activities accounting for 22 % and 17 % of global emissions, respectively. In 2022, global GHG emissions reached 53.8 Gt CO2eq, underscoring the critical need for net-zero technologies and a circular carbon economy. This review systematically evaluates the ef昀椀ciencies of non-thermal and electrochemical CO2 conversion technologies, including plasma, arti昀椀cial photosynthesis, and electrochemical methods, for achieving net-zero emissions. These advanced technologies offer promising pathways for converting CO2 into value-added chemicals, such as syngas, methanol, and formic acid, while reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. However, upscaling these technologies from laboratory to industrial scales presents signi昀椀cant challenges, including high energy consumption, economic feasibility, and environmental impacts. The review highlights the mechanisms of CO2 conversion, economic considerations, and the potential for industrial implementation. Priority research directions are identi昀椀ed, focusing on ecological footprints, green supply chains, and the integration of renewable energy sources. By addressing these challenges, non-thermal and electrochemical CO2 conversion technologies can play a pivotal role in mitigating climate change and advancing toward a sustainable, circular carbon economy. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Sustainable Energy & Fuels)
    Quantification of environmental impacts through life cycle assessment is essential when evaluating bioenergy systems as potential replacements for fossil-based energy systems. Bioenergy systems employing localized fast pyrolysis combined with electrocatalytic hydrogenation followed by centralized hydroprocessing (Py-ECH) can have higher carbon and energy efficiencies than traditional cellulosic biorefineries. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was performed to compare the performance of Py-ECH versus cellulosic fermentation in three environmental impact categories: climate change, water scarcity, and eutrophication. Liquid hydrocarbon production using Py-ECH was found to have much lower eutrophication potential and water scarcity footprint than cellulosic ethanol production. Greater amounts of renewable electricity led to lower greenhouse gas emissions for the Py-ECH processing. When the renewable fraction of grid electricity is higher than 87%, liquid hydrocarbon production using Py-ECH has lower greenhouse gas emissions than cellulosic ethanol production. A sensitivity analysis illustrates the major role of annual soil carbon sequestration in determining system-wide net greenhouse gas emissions. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email