- Award ID(s):
- 1715826
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10273281
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Development
- Volume:
- 148
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 0950-1991
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract Background The 29-member Arabidopsis AHL gene family is classified into three main classes based on nucleotide and protein sequence evolutionary differences. These differences include the presence or absence of introns, type and/or number of conserved AT-hook and PPC domains. AHL gene family members are divided into two phylogenetic clades, Clade-A and Clade-B. A majority of the 29 members remain functionally uncharacterized. Furthermore, the biological significance of the DNA and peptide sequence diversity, observed in the conserved motifs and domains found in the different AHL types, is a subject area that remains largely unexplored. Results Transgenic plants overexpressing AtAHL20 flowered later than the wild type under both short and long days. Transcript accumulation analyses showed that 35S:AtAHL20 plants contained reduced FT, TSF, AGL8 and SPL3 mRNA levels. Similarly, overexpression of AtAHL20’s orthologue in Camelina sativa, Arabidopsis’ closely related Brassicaceae family member species, conferred a late-flowering phenotype via suppression of CsFT expression. However, overexpression of an aberrant AtAHL20 gene harboring a missense mutation in the AT-hook domain’s highly conserved R-G-R core motif abolished the late-flowering phenotype. Data from targeted yeast-two-hybrid assays showed that AtAHL20 interacted with itself and several other Clade-A Type-I AHLs which have been previously implicated in flowering-time regulation: AtAHL19, AtAHL22 and AtAHL29. Conclusion We showed via gain-of-function analysis that AtAHL20 is a negative regulator of FT expression, as well as other downstream flowering time regulating genes. A similar outcome in Camelina sativa transgenic plants overexpressing CsAHL20 suggest that this is a conserved function. Our results demonstrate that AtAHL20 acts as a photoperiod-independent negative regulator of transition to flowering.more » « less
-
We assessed mechanistic temperature influence on flowering by incorporating temperature-responsive flowering mechanisms across developmental age into an existing model. Temperature influences the leaf production rate as well as expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), a photoperiodic flowering regulator that is expressed in leaves. The Arabidopsis Framework Model incorporated temperature influence on leaf growth but ignored the consequences of leaf growth on and direct temperature influence of FT expression. We measured FT production in differently aged leaves and modified the model, adding mechanistic temperature influence on FT transcription, and causing whole-plant FT to accumulate with leaf growth. Our simulations suggest that in long days, the developmental stage (leaf number) at which the reproductive transition occurs is influenced by day length and temperature through FT, while temperature influences the rate of leaf production and the time (in days) the transition occurs. Further, we demonstrate that FT is mainly produced in the first 10 leaves in the Columbia (Col-0) accession, and that FT accumulation alone cannot explain flowering in conditions in which flowering is delayed. Our simulations supported our hypotheses that: (i) temperature regulation of FT, accumulated with leaf growth, is a component of thermal time, and (ii) incorporating mechanistic temperature regulation of FT can improve model predictions when temperatures change over time.more » « less
-
SUMMARY Flowering of the reference legume
Medicago truncatula is promoted by winter cold (vernalization) followed by long‐day photoperiods (VLD) similar to winter annual Arabidopsis. However, Medicago lacksFLC andCO , key regulators of Arabidopsis VLD flowering. Most plants have twoINHIBITOR OF GROWTH (ING ) genes (ING1 andING2 ), encoding proteins with an ING domain with two anti‐parallel alpha‐helices and a plant homeodomain (PHD) finger, but their genetic role has not been previously described. In Medicago,Mting1 gene‐edited mutants developed and flowered normally, but anMting2‐1 Tnt1 insertion mutant and gene‐editedMting2 mutants had developmental abnormalities including delayed flowering particularly in VLD, compact architecture, abnormal leaves with extra leaflets but no trichomes, and smaller seeds and barrels.Mting2 mutants had reduced expression of activators of flowering, including theFT ‐like geneMtFTa1 , and increased expression of the candidate repressorMtTFL1c , consistent with the delayed flowering of the mutant.MtING2 overexpression complementedMting2‐1 , but did not accelerate flowering in wild type. The MtING2 PHD finger bound H3K4me2/3 peptides weaklyin vitro , but analysis of gene‐edited mutants indicated that it was dispensable to MtING2 function in wild‐type plants. RNA sequencing experiments indicated that >7000 genes are mis‐expressed in theMting2‐1 mutant, consistent with its strong mutant phenotypes. Interestingly, ChIP‐seq analysis identified >5000 novel H3K4me3 locations in the genome ofMting2‐1 mutants compared to wild type R108. Overall, our mutant study has uncovered an important physiological role of a plantING2 gene in development, flowering, and gene expression, which likely involves an epigenetic mechanism. -
A level of redundancy and interplay among the transcriptional regulators of floral development safeguards a plant's reproductive success and ensures crop production. In the present study, an additional layer of complexity in the regulation of floral meristem (FM) identity and flower development is elucidated linking carotenoid biosynthesis and metabolism to the regulation of determinate flowering. The accumulation and subsequent cleavage of a diverse array of ζ-carotenes in the chloroplast biogenesis 5 (clb5) mutant of Arabidopsis results in the reprogramming of meristematic gene regulatory networks establishing FM identity mirroring that of the FM identity master regulator, APETALA1 (AP1). The immediate transition to floral development in clb5 requires long photoperiods in a GIGANTEA-independent manner, whereas AP1 is essential for the floral organ development of clb5. The elucidation of this link between carotenoid metabolism and floral development translates to tomato exposing a regulation of FM identity redundant to and initiated by AP1 and proposed to be dependent on the E class floral initiation and organ identity regulator, SEPALLATA3 (SEP3).more » « less
-
Summary Many plants require prolonged exposure to cold to acquire the competence to flower. The process by which cold exposure results in competence is known as vernalization. In
Arabidopsis thaliana , vernalization leads to the stable repression of the floral repressor via chromatin modification, including an increase of trimethylation on lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3) by Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (FLOWERING LOCUS CPRC 2). Vernalization in pooids is associated with the stable induction of a floral promoter, (VERNALIZATION 1VRN1 ). From a screen for mutants with a reduced vernalization requirement in the model grassBrachypodium distachyon , we identified two recessive alleles of (ENHANCER OF ZESTE ‐LIKE 1 ).EZL 1 is orthologous toEZL 1A. thaliana , a gene that encodes the catalytic subunit ofCURLY LEAF 1PRC 2.B. distachyon ezl1 mutants flower rapidly without vernalization in long‐day (LD ) photoperiods; thus, is required for the proper maintenance of the vegetative state prior to vernalization. Transcriptomic studies inEZL 1ezl1 revealed mis‐regulation of thousands of genes, including ectopic expression of several floral homeotic genes in leaves. Loss of results in the global reduction of H3K27me3 and H3K27me2, consistent with this gene making a major contribution toEZL 1PRC 2 activity inB. distachyon . Furthermore, inezl1 mutants, the flowering genes andVRN 1 (AGAMOUS ) are ectopically expressed and have reduced H3K27me3. Artificial microAG RNA knock‐down of either orVRN 1 inAG ezl1‐1 mutants partially restores wild‐type flowering behavior in non‐vernalized plants, suggesting that ectopic expression inezl1 mutants may contribute to the rapid‐flowering phenotype.