Lithium is the most attractive anode material for high-energy density rechargeable batteries, but its cycling is plagued by morphological irreversibility and dendrite growth that arise in part from its heterogeneous “native” solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Enriching the SEI with lithium fluoride (LiF) has recently gained popularity to improve Li cyclability. However, the intrinsic function of LiF—whether chemical, mechanical, or kinetic in nature—remains unknown. Herein, we investigated the stability of LiF in model LiF-enriched SEIs that are either artificially preformed or derived from fluorinated electrolytes, and thus, the effect of the LiF source on Li electrode behavior. We discovered that the mechanical integrity of LiF is easily compromised during plating, making it intrinsically unable to protect Li. The ensuing in situ repair of the interface by electrolyte, either regenerating LiF or forming an extra elastomeric “outer layer,” is identified as the more critical determinant of Li electrode performance. Our findings present an updated and dynamic picture of the LiF-enriched SEI and demonstrate the need to carefully consider the combined role of ionic and electrolyte-derived layers in future design strategies.
- Award ID(s):
- 1805159
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10274252
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Chem
- ISSN:
- 2451-9294
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract The 3D nanocomposite structure of plated lithium (LiMetal) and solid electrolyte interphases (SEI), including a polymer‐rich surficial passivation layer (SEI exoskeleton) and inorganic SEI “fossils” buried inside amorphous Li matrix, is resolved using cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. With ether‐based DOLDME‐LiTFSI electrolyte, LiF and Li2O nanocrystals are formed and embedded in a thin but tough amorphous polymer in the SEI exoskeleton. The fast Li‐stripping directions are along or , which produces eight exposed {111} planes at halfway charging. Full Li stripping produces completely sagging, empty SEI husks that can sustain large bending and buckling, with the smallest bending radius of curvature observed approaching tens of nanometers without apparent damage. In the 2nd round of Li plating, a thin LiBCCsheet first nucleates at the current collector, extends to the top end of the deflated SEI husk, and then expands its thickness. The apparent zero wetting angle between LiBCCand the SEI interior means that the heterogeneous nucleation energy barrier is zero. Due to its complete‐wetting property and chemo‐mechanical stability, the SEI largely prevents further reactions between the Li metal and the electrolyte, which explains the superior performance of Li‐metal batteries with ether‐based electrolytes. However, uneven refilling of the SEI husks results in dendrite protrusions and some new SEI formation during the 2nd plating. A strategy to form bigger SEI capsules during the initial cycle with higher energy density than the following cycles enables further enhanced Coulombic efficiency to above 99%.
-
With more than 10 times the capacity of the graphite used in current commercial batteries, lithium metal is ideal for a high-capacity battery anode; however, lithium metal electrodes suffer from safety and efficiency problems that prevent their wide industrial adoption. Their intrinsic high reactivity towards most liquid organic electrolytes leads to lithium loss and dendrite growth, which result in poor efficiency and short circuiting. However, the multitude of factors that contribute to dendrite formation make determining a nucleation mechanism extremely difficult. Here, we study the intricate science of dendrite nucleation on metallic lithium by using an array of analytical techniques that provide simultaneous ultra-high spatial sensitivity and chemical selectivity. Our results reveal a 3D picture of the chemical make-up of the native Li surface and the resulting solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) with better than 200 nm resolution. We find that, contrary to the general understanding, the initial surface chemistry, not the topography, is the dominant factor leading to dendrite nucleation. Specifically, inhomogeneously distributed organic material in the native surface leads to inhomogeneously dispersed LiF-rich SEI regions where dendrite nucleation is favored. This has significant implications for battery research as it elucidates a mechanism for inhomogeneous SEI formation, something that is accepted, but not well understood, and highlights the importance of Li surface preparation for experimental studies, which is implicit in battery research, but not directly addressed in the literature. By homogenizing the initial lithium surface composition, and thus the SEI composition, we increase the number of dendrite nucleation sites and thereby decrease the dendrite size, which significantly increases the electrode lifetime.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract A new concentrated ternary salt ether‐based electrolyte enables stable cycling of lithium metal battery (LMB) cells with high‐mass‐loading (13.8 mg cm−2, 2.5 mAh cm−2) NMC622 (LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2) cathodes and 50 μm Li anodes. Termed “CETHER‐3,” this electrolyte is based on LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and LiBF4with 5 vol% fluorinated ethylene carbonate in 1,2‐dimethoxyethane. Commercial carbonate and state‐of‐the‐art binary salt ether electrolytes were also tested as baselines. With CETHER‐3, the electrochemical performance of the full‐cell battery is among the most favorably reported in terms of high‐voltage cycling stability. For example, LiNi
x Mny Co1–x –y O2(NMC)‐Li metal cells retain 80% capacity at 430 cycles with a 4.4 V cut‐off and 83% capacity at 100 cycles with a 4.5 V cut‐off (charge at C/5, discharge at C/2). According to simulation by density functional theory and molecular dynamics, this favorable performance is an outcome of enhanced coordination between Li+and the solvent/salt molecules. Combining advanced microscopy (high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy) and surface science (X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, time‐of‐fight secondary ion mass spectroscopy, Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy), it is demonstrated that a thinner and more stable cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) are formed. The CEI is rich in lithium sulfide (Li2SO3), while the SEI is rich in Li3N and LiF. During cycling, the CEI/SEI suppresses both the deleterious transformation of the cathode R‐3m layered near‐surface structure into disordered rock salt and the growth of lithium metal dendrites. -
more » « less
Abstract The application of Li‐metal‐anodes (LMA) can significantly improve the energy density of state‐of‐the‐art lithium ion batteries. Lots of new electrolyte systems have been developed to form a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) films, thereby achieving long‐term cycle stability of LMA. Unfortunately, the common problem faced by these electrolytes is poor oxidation stability, which rarely supports the cycling of high‐voltage Li‐metal batteries (LMBs). In this work, a new single‐component solvent dimethoxy(methyl)(3,3,3‐trifluoropropyl) silane is proposed. The electrolyte composed of this solvent and 3
m LiFSI salt successfully supports the long‐term cycle stability of limited‐Li (50 µm)||high loading LiCoO2(≈20 mg cm−2) cell at 4.6 V. Experiments and theoretical research results show that the outstanding performance of the electrolyte in high‐voltage LMBs is mainly attributed to its unique solvation structures and its great ability to build a highly stable and robust interphase on the surface of LMA and high‐voltage cathodes. Interestingly, this proposed electrolyte system builds a stable SEI film rich in LiF and Li3N on the surface of LMA by improving the two‐electron reduction activity of FSI−without adding LiNO3, the well‐known additive used for LMBs. The design idea of the proposed electrolyte can guide the development of high‐voltage LMBs.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.06.019
