Abstract Background Numerous cardiometabolic factors may underlie risk of hearing loss. Modifiable risk factors such as non-optimal blood pressure (BP) are of interest. Purpose To investigate early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in persons with nonoptimal BP. Research Design A cross-sectional nonexperimental study was performed. Study Sample Fifty-two adults (18–55 years) served as subjects. Individuals were classified as having optimal (systolic [S] BP < 120 and diastolic [D] BP < 80 mm Hg, n = 25) or non-optimal BP (SBP ≥=120 or DBP ≥=80 mm Hg or antihypertensive use, n = 27). Thirteen subjects had hypertension (HTN) (SBP ≥130 or DBP ≥80 mm Hg or use of antihypertensives). Data Collection and Analysis Behavioral thresholds from 0.25 to 16 kHz were collected. Threshold auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) were recorded using rarefaction clicks (17.7/second) from 80 dB nHL to wave V threshold. Electrocochleograms were obtained with 90 dB nHL 7.1/second alternating clicks and assessed for summating and compound action potentials (APs). Outcomes were compared via independent samples t tests. Linear mixed effects models for behavioral thresholds and ABR wave latencies were constructed to account for potential confounders. Results Wave I and III latencies were comparable between optimal and non-optimal BP groups. Wave I was prolonged in hypertensive versus optimal BP subjects at stimulus level 70 dB nHL (p = 0.016). ABR wave V latencies were prolonged in non-optimal BP at stimulus level 80 dB nHL (p = 0.048) and in HTN at levels of 80, 50, and 30 dB nHL (all p < 0.050). DBP was significantly correlated with wave V latency (r = 0.295; p = 0.039). No differences in ABR amplitudes were observed between optimal and non-optimal BP subjects. Electrocochleographic study showed statistically comparable action and summating potential amplitudes between optimal and non-optimal BP subjects. AP latencies were also similar between the groups. Analysis using a set baseline amplitude of 0 μV showed that hypertensive subjects had higher summating (p = 0.038) and AP (p = 0.047) amplitudes versus optimal BP subjects; AP latencies were comparable. Conclusion Elevated BP and more specifically, HTN was associated with subtle AEP abnormalities. This study provides preliminary evidence that nonoptimal BP, and more specifically HTN, may be related to auditory neural dysfunction; larger confirmatory studies are warranted.
more »
« less
CNN-Based LCD Transcription of Blood Pressure From a Mobile Phone Camera
Routine blood pressure (BP) measurement in pregnancy is commonly performed using automated oscillometric devices. Since no wireless oscillometric BP device has been validated in preeclamptic populations, a simple approach for capturing readings from such devices is needed, especially in low-resource settings where transmission of BP data from the field to central locations is an important mechanism for triage. To this end, a total of 8192 BP readings were captured from the Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) screen of a standard Omron M7 self-inflating BP cuff using a cellphone camera. A cohort of 49 lay midwives captured these data from 1697 pregnant women carrying singletons between 6 weeks and 40 weeks gestational age in rural Guatemala during routine screening. Images exhibited a wide variability in their appearance due to variations in orientation and parallax; environmental factors such as lighting, shadows; and image acquisition factors such as motion blur and problems with focus. Images were independently labeled for readability and quality by three annotators (BP range: 34–203 mm Hg) and disagreements were resolved. Methods to preprocess and automatically segment the LCD images into diastolic BP, systolic BP and heart rate using a contour-based technique were developed. A deep convolutional neural network was then trained to convert the LCD images into numerical values using a multi-digit recognition approach. On readable low- and high-quality images, this proposed approach achieved a 91% classification accuracy and mean absolute error of 3.19 mm Hg for systolic BP and 91% accuracy and mean absolute error of 0.94 mm Hg for diastolic BP. These error values are within the FDA guidelines for BP monitoring when poor quality images are excluded. The performance of the proposed approach was shown to be greatly superior to state-of-the-art open-source tools (Tesseract and the Google Vision API). The algorithm was developed such that it could be deployed on a phone and work without connectivity to a network.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1636933
- PAR ID:
- 10275619
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
- Volume:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 2624-8212
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Background: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and requires long-term health treatment and ongoing monitoring to the extent that traditional management approaches may be limited in providing. Adopting appropriate digital tools like mobile health technology (mHealth) could be an effective strategy for improving the control and management of this public health burden. This pilot studyevaluated the feasibility of the AHOMKA care model at two tertiary hospitals in Ghana. Outcome measures were changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure model acceptance by patients and health care providers.Objective: This study sought to assess the overall pattern of home blood pressure self-monitoring among participants from two teaching hospitals in southern Ghana, using mHealth.Methods: Participants attending two (2) cardiology clinics were recruited for this mixed-method pilot study over a period of eight (8) weeks. Following a longitudinal single-group approach, we conducted structured interviews at the baseline and end-line and used exports of the AHOMKA mHealth application, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with patients and healthcare providers. Repeated measuresanalysis of variance was adopted to assess differences in SBP and DBP between baseline and end line.Results: This pilot study involved 27 participants with a mean of 50.4 ± 11.0 years-approximately 1:1 male-female participation. Mean SBP decreased by 11.6 mm Hg (95% CI = 15.0 to -8.2), from an average of 138.6 mmHg at baseline to 126.2 mmHg at endline. Average DBP was also significantly reduced by 3.0 mmHg (95% CI = -5.5 to -0.5), from an average of 87.0 mmHg at baseline to 83.0 mmHg at endline. Patients and healthcare providers were satisfied and optimistic about the AHOMKA care model.Conclusion: The encouraging trend in BP outcomes and high response rate from this pilot study provides evidence for further investigation involving the assessment of the effectiveness of the AHOMKA care model while culturally adapting the model to the Ghanaian context. In the spectrum of hypertension interventions, AHOMKA has the potential to ease the burden on the public health systemmore » « less
-
Abstract Hearing loss has been associated with individual cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and, to a lesser extent, CVD risk metrics. However, these relationships are understudied in clinical populations. We conducted a retrospective study of electronic health records to evaluate the relationship between hearing loss and CVD risk burden. Hearing loss was defined as puretone average (PTA 0.5,1,2,4 ) > 20 dB hearing level (HL). Optimal CVD risk was defined as nondiabetic, nonsmoking, systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 120 and diastolic (D)BP < 80 mm Hg, and total cholesterol < 180 mg/dL. Major CVD risk factors were diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL or statin use. We identified 6332 patients (mean age = 62.96 years; 45.5% male); 64.0% had hearing loss. Sex-stratified logistic regression adjusted for age, noise exposure, hearing aid use, and body mass index examined associations between hearing loss and CVD risk. For males, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and ≥ 2 major CVD risk factors were associated with hearing loss. For females, diabetes, smoking, and ≥ 2 major CVD risk factors were significant risk factors. Compared to those with no CVD risk factors, there is a higher likelihood of hearing loss in patients with ≥ 2 major CVD risk factors. Future research to better understand sex dependence in the hearing loss-hypertension relationship is indicated.more » « less
-
Diagnosing hypertension or hemodialysis requires patients to carry a blood pressure (BP) monitoring device for 24 hours. Th erefore, wearing the wrist/arm-based BP monitoring device, in this case, has a signifi cant impact on users' daily activities. To address the problem, we developed eBP, an ear-worn device that measures blood pressure from inside the ear. Th rough the evaluation of 35 subjects, eBP can achieve the average error of 1.8 mmHg for systolic BP and -3.1 mmHg for diastolic BP with the standard deviation error of 7.2 mmHg and 7.9 mmHg, respectively.more » « less
-
Frequent blood pressure monitoring is the key to diagnosis and treatments of many severe diseases. However, the conventional ambulatory methods require patients to carry a blood pressure (BP) monitoring device for 24 h and conduct the measurement every 10--15 min. Despite their extensive usage, wearing the wrist/arm-based BP monitoring device for a long time has a significant impact on users' daily activities. To address the problem, we developed eBP to measure blood pressure (BP) from inside user's ear aiming to minimize the measurement's impact on users' normal activities although maximizing its comfort level. The key novelty of eBP includes (1) a light-based inflatable pulse sensor which goes inside the ear, (2) a digital air pump with a fine controller, and (3) BP estimation algorithms that eliminate the need of blocking the blood flow inside the ear. Through the comparative study of 35 subjects, eBP can achieve the average error of 1.8 mmHg for systolic (high-pressure value) and -3.1 mmHg for diastolic (low-pressure value) with the standard deviation error of 7.2 mmHg and 7.9 mmHg, respectively. These results satisfy the FDA's AAMI standard, which requires a mean error of less than 5 mmHg and a standard deviation of less than 8 mmHg.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

