Organisms are composed of hierarchically arranged component parts that must work together to successfully achieve whole organism functions. In addition to integration among individual parts, some ecological demands require functional systems to work together in a type of inter-system performance integration. While performance can be measured by the ability to successfully accomplish ecologically relevant tasks, integration across performance traits can provide a deeper understanding of how these traits allow an organism to survive. The ability to move and the ability to consume food are essential to life, but during prey capture these two functions are typically integrated. Suction-feeding fishes have been used as a model of these interactions, but it is unclear how other ecologically relevant scenarios might reduce or change integration. To stimulate further research into these ideas, we highlight three contexts with the potential to result in changes in integration and underlying performance traits: (1) behavioral flexibility in aquatic feeding modes for capturing alternative prey types, (2) changes in the physical demands imposed by prey capture across environments, and (3) secondary adaptation for suction prey capture behaviors. These examples provide a broad scope of potential drivers of integration that are relevant to selection pressures experienced across vertebrate evolution. To demonstrate how these ideas can be applied and stimulate hypotheses, we provide observations from preliminary analyses of locally adapted populations of Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) capturing prey using suction and biting feeding strategies and an Atlantic mudskipper (Periophthalmus barbarus) capturing prey above and below water. We also include a re-analysis of published data from two species of secondarily aquatic cetaceans, beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), to examine the potential for secondary adaptation to affect integration in suction prey capture behaviors. Each of these examples support the broad importance of integration between locomotor and feeding performance but outline new ways that these relationships can be important when suction demands are reduced or altered. Future work in these areas will yield promising insights into vertebrate evolution and we hope to encourage further discussion on possible avenues of research on functional integration during prey capture.
Field Observations Provide Biological Context for Interpreting Laboratory Data: The Locomotory Performance of Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) as an Example
Field observations of animal behavior are essential for guiding the interpretations of laboratory data in order to ensure that they coincide with biological reality. Knowing how an organism behaves in its natural environment is a necessary first step in bridging the gap between experimental data collected in the controlled, artificial environment of the lab and explaining the adaptive significance of measured traits. Field observations also challenge assumptions about behavioral definitions and the apparent discreteness of behaviors measured in the lab. As part of an ongoing study in the locomotor performance of Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), we illustrate the role field observations play in contextualizing and expanding interpretations of experimental data and standard assumptions about Bluegill behavior. A comprehensive field study of Lake Waban (Wellesley, MA) and its inhabitants was carried out using underwater cameras, fish finding sonar, and temperature/luminosity loggers to develop a behavioral profile of Bluegill relative to their habitat and interspecific interactions. Although previous experimental work assumed Bluegill adopted locomotor strategies that maximized energy efficiency, field observations demonstrate that swimming performance is driven by a myriad of abiotic and biotic factors. These factors include the need to navigate complex habitats, to flee from predators, to adopt context-specific foraging strategies, to ward off rivals, and to coordinate social interactions. These observations add an extra dimension for understanding why Bluegill adopt particular swimming behaviors and how those behaviors might be adaptively significant at each stage of their life history.
more »
« less
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10276558
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Integrative and comparative biology
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- Supplement_1
- ISSN:
- 1557-7023
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- E993-E994
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
Locomotion is an important behavior in the life history of animals and is characterized by discrete gaits, which may be adopted for optimal energetic efficiency, fatigue resistance, or maneuverability. We evaluated the kinematics and electromyography of Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) swimming at different gaits to evaluate which factors might influence gait choice. When placed in the flume, Bluegill adopted a steady swimming gait until speeds reached 2.0 BL/s. When swimming volitionally, either in a laboratory pool or the field, Bluegill adopted an intermittent swimming gait (burst phase followed by a glide phase) and swam at average speeds of 1.0-1.3 BL/s. No statistical relationship was found between the kinematics of the burst and glide phases in either the lab or the field, so the phases were considered uncoupled. Furthermore, since the kinematics (tailbeat frequency, glide-duty factor) of lab and field volitional swimming were statistically identical, the EMGs of volition swimming in the lab likely reflect field effort. When relativized to volitional swimming speeds, the EMG intensities for both gaits were statistically identical. These results suggest that intermittent swimming may not reflect a strategy for energetic efficiency. Instead, the decoupling between the burst and glide phase may improve maneuverability, since 75% of 3D tracked intermittent swimming bouts (n=129) in the field involved a directional change. Although previous research suggests that intermittent swimming may also provide fatigue resistance, we hypothesize that intermittent swimming evolved in Bluegill as an adaptive gait for navigating their densely vegetated habitat.more » « less
-
Rétaux, Sylvie (Ed.)Fish display a remarkable diversity of social behaviors, both within and between species. While social behaviors are likely critical for survival, surprisingly little is known about how they evolve in response to changing environmental pressures. With its highly social surface form and multiple populations of a largely asocial, blind, cave-dwelling form, the Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus , provides a powerful model to study the evolution of social behavior. Here we use motion tracking and analysis of swimming kinematics to quantify social swimming in four Astyanax mexicanus populations. In the light, surface fish school, maintaining both close proximity and alignment with each other. In the dark, surface fish no longer form coherent schools, however, they still show evidence of an attempt to align and maintain proximity when they find themselves near another fish. In contrast, cavefish from three independently-evolved populations (Pachón, Molino, Tinaja) show little preference for proximity or alignment, instead exhibiting behaviors that suggest active avoidance of each other. Two of the three cave populations we studied also slow down when more fish are present in the tank, a behavior which is not observed in surface fish in light or the dark, suggesting divergent responses to conspecifics. Using data-driven computer simulations, we show that the observed reduction in swimming speed is sufficient to alter the way fish explore their environment: it can increase time spent exploring away from the walls. Thus, the absence of schooling in cavefish is not merely a consequence of their inability to see, but may rather be a genuine behavioral adaptation that impacts the way they explore their environment.more » « less
-
P1-97: In early summer, nesting Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) expend large amounts of energy building nests, spawning, protecting their offspring, and chasing away predators. The energetic demands of nesting are likely significant and may heavily influence their life history and reproductive success. However, the exact metabolic cost of nesting is difficult to quantify without precise information about the three dimensional position of the center of mass of nesting fish. Field observations of Bluegill Sunfish nesting in Lake Waban (Wellesley, MA) were obtained throughout June until early July by using underwater cameras, fitted with a temperature and light sensor, calibrated to allow three dimensional tracking. The positional data of nesting Bluegill Sunfish were analyzed to derive velocity and acceleration in order to calculate their metabolic rate. We chose to analyze repetitive nesting behaviors, such as rim circling and defensive chasing, due to their frequency of occurrence and consequentially high metabolic demand. Using metabolic rates calculated from Bluegill swimming in a flume, we found that rim circling is nearly 22.2 times more metabolically expensive than the average metabolic cost of swimming in a straight path for the same velocity and duration. Since rim circling is so metabolically expensive and since we estimate that rim circling occurs nearly 25,500 times during an 8 day nesting period, our results strongly suggest that the nesting cycle is one of the most critical periods in the life history of Bluegill Sunfish. The high energetic demands of nesting and the temporary bout of starvation while the fish occupies its nest results in a small margin of error for reproductive success. These conclusions deepen our understanding of male Bluegills’ true paternal investment and can serve to illuminate our understanding of their life history from a quantifiable perspective.more » « less
-
As generalists, Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) feed in densely vegetated littoral and pelagic zones. Paradoxically, being a generalist requires that Bluegill adopt habitat-specific foraging strategies in order to successfully exploit local environments. To better understand their foraging behaviors, underwater cameras were deployed in different locations of Lake Waban, MA to reflect the diversity of local habitats within the lake. We identified three foraging strategies: hunting, grazing, and pelagic feeding. Each strategy is categorized as opportunistic or intentional and some are further subdivided into several modalities. Hunting occurs in shallow littoral zones, is intentional, often performed in groups, and is characterized by repeating cycles of burst-coast-stop-search until prey is visually detected. Grazing also occurs in shallow littoral zones, but is either intentional or opportunistic, and is characterized by three modalities depending on vegetation type. Active grazing involves biting and pulling on pondweed, whereas passive grazing involves hovering near milfoil and delicate suction feeding, and surface grazing involves searching beneath lily pads and explosive bouts of suction feeding. Pelagic feeding occurs in deep open water, is often opportunistic, may occur in groups, and is characterized by intermittent swimming from one morsel to the next. Some correlation exists between phenotype, age, and foraging strategy. For example, darker and deeper bodied adults engage in hunting, whereas lighter and fusiform Bluegill of all ages engage in pelagic feeding. These observations demonstrate the complex behaviors that characterize a paradigmatic generalist and illustrate the multitude of variables that impact their specific feeding strategies.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
