skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Evaluation of boundary-layer and urban-canopy parameterizations for simulating wind in Miami during Hurricane Irma (2017)
Title: Evaluation of boundary-layer and urban-canopy parameterizations for simulating wind in Miami during Hurricane Irma (2017)
Abstract The simulated winds within the urban canopy of landfalling tropical cyclones are sensitive to the representation of the planetary-boundary and urban-canopy layers in numerical weather prediction models. In order to assess the sub-grid-scale parameterizations of these layers, mesoscale model simulations were executed and evaluated against near-surface observations as the outer wind field of Hurricane Irma (2017) interacted with the built-up region from downtown Miami northward to West Palm Beach. Four model simulations were examined, comprised of two different planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterizations (a local closure scheme with turbulent kinetic energy prediction and a nonlocal closure scheme) and two different urban canopy models (UCMs) [a zeroth order bulk scheme and a multilayer Building Effect Parameterization (BEP) that mimics the three-dimensionality of buildings]. Overall, the simulated urban canopy winds were weakly sensitive to the PBL scheme and strongly sensitive to the UCM. The bulk simulations compared most favorably to an analyzed wind swath in the urban environment, while the BEP simulations had larger negative biases in the same region. There is uncertainty in magnitude of the urban environment biases due to the lack of many urban sheltered measurements in the wind swath analysis. Biases in the rural environment were similar among the bulk and BEP simulations. An improved comparison with the analyzed wind swath in the urban region was obtained by reducing the drag coefficient in BEP in one of the PBL schemes. The usefulness of BEP was demonstrated in its ability to predict realistic heterogeneous near-surface velocity patterns in urban regions.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1663978
PAR ID:
10282233
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Monthly Weather Review
ISSN:
0027-0644
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract The multilayer urban canopy models (UCMs) building effect parameterization (BEP) and BEP + building energy model (BEM; a building energy model integrated in BEP) are added to the Yonsei University (YSU) planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The additions allow for the first analysis of the detailed effects of buildings on the urban boundary layer in a nonlocal closure scheme. The modified YSU PBL parameterization is compared with the other 1.5-order local PBL parameterizations that predict turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), Mellor–Yamada–Janjić and Bougeault–Lacarerre, using both ideal and real cases. The ideal-case evaluation confirms that BEP and BEP+BEM produce the expected results in the YSU PBL parameterization because the simulations are qualitatively similar to the TKE-based PBL parameterizations in which the multilayer UCMs have long existed. The modified YSU PBL parameterization is further evaluated for a real case. Similar to the ideal case, there are larger differences among the different UCMs (simple bulk scheme, BEP, and BEP+BEM) than across the PBL parameterizations when the UCM is held fixed. Based on evaluation against urban near-surface wind and temperature observations for this case, the BEP and BEP+BEM simulations are superior to the simple bulk scheme for each PBL parameterization. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Atmosphere)
    Urban canopy models (UCMs) in mesoscale numerical weather prediction models need evaluation to understand biases in urban environments under a range of conditions. The authors evaluate a new drag formula in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model’s multilayer UCM, the Building Effect Parameterization combined with the Building Energy Model (BEP+BEM), against both in-situ measurements in the urban environment as well as simulations with a simple bulk scheme and BEP+BEM using the old drag formula. The new drag formula varies with building packing density, while the old drag formula is constant. The case study is a strong cold frontal passage that occurred in Houston during the winter of 2017, causing high winds. It is found that both BEP+BEM simulations have lower peak wind speeds, consistent with near-surface measurements, while the bulk simulation has winds that are too strong. The constant-drag BEP+BEM simulation has a near-zero wind speed bias, while the new-drag simulation has a negative bias. Although the focus is on the impact of drag on the urban wind speeds, both BEP+BEM simulations have larger negative biases in the near-surface temperature than the bulk-scheme simulation. Reasons for the different performances are discussed. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, https://www.proquest.com/pqdtlocal1006646/docview/3241095624/4036A158A5504266PQ/2?accountid=7107&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses)
    Hurricanes are among the costliest natural disasters in the United States and regularly inflict severe damage on urban infrastructure. Accurate forecasts are therefore essential for preparedness and limiting these extreme events' economic toll. Numerical weather‑prediction (NWP) models—such as the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) system—are powerful forecasting tools. However, some of their physical parameterizations were neither designed for nor tested with real hurricanes. This thesis addresses that gap by evaluating two key parameterizations in WRF: (i) subgrid‑scale (SGS) turbulence schemes and (ii) surface‑roughness and urban canopy treatments. The first part of the study investigates how SGS eddy‑viscosity choices affect hurricane intensity, turbulence, and wind profiles. Large‑eddy simulations (LES) of five major hurricanes were run with a 1.5‑order, three‑dimensional turbulent‑kinetic‑energy (TKE) SGS scheme. Each storm was simulated under three eddy‑viscosity settings— default, halved, and doubled—yielding 15 cases. A parallel set of 10 cases employed an alternative nonlinear backscatter and anisotropy (NBA) SGS scheme. Two idealized LES runs and one fine-grid (~80 m) nested simulation brought the total to 33. Reducing SGS stress intensified storms by raising boundary‑layer wind speeds and lowering the altitude of peak winds, improving surface‑wind forecasts by ~9 % and minimum sea‑level pressure by ~29 % relative to the default setting. These results reveal that standard SGS models are overly dissipative because they overlook the rotational suppression of turbulence, underscoring the need for SGS schemes tailored to hurricane dynamics. The second part assesses how aerodynamic roughness length (z0) and urban‑canopy schemes shape near‑surface winds over cities. For four land‑falling hurricanes affecting Houston and New Orleans, increasing z0 in the Single‑Layer Urban Canopy Model (SLUCM) reduced modeled wind speeds and cut mean absolute error (MAE) by ~20 %, whereas decreasing z0 introduced large positive biases. Additional experiments compared three urban options—Bulk (no‑urban), SLUCM, and the multi‑layer Building Energy Model (BEM). The Bulk scheme delivered the most accurate surface‑wind forecasts in every nested domain, while SLUCM slightly outperformed BEM in the limited vertical‑profile data. These findings highlight the need to recalibrate urban schemes and surface‑drag parameters when applying WRF to hurricane‑force winds. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.uh.edu/pqdtlocal1006646/dissertations-theses/advancing-planetary-boundary-layer/docview/3241723804/sem-2?accountid=7107)
    Extreme weather events such as hurricanes and heatwaves could cause significant damage to the economy and urban resiliency. Accurate meteorological forecasts of these extreme events could mitigate some aspects of their damage by providing precautionary alerts. The weather forecasts heavily rely on the parameterization of the planetary boundary layer (PBL), which is the lowest layer of the atmosphere that extends up to ~1 km above the surface. In hurricanes, the rotational nature of flows can suppress turbulence; however, such effects are neglected in the conventional PBL schemes, leading to over-diffusive simulations and inaccurate hurricane intensity, size, and track forecasts. In urban areas, complex surface heterogeneities and the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effects are inadequately represented by current PBL models, causing inaccurate forecasts of atmospheric stability, aerosol transport, and wind speeds. To address these issues, the dissertation characterizes the impacts of PBL parameterizations on three problems: hurricane forecasts, air quality forecasts in cities, and wind forecasts in heterogeneous urban areas. To this end, dissertation systematically explored modifications to the existing PBL schemes, urban models, and roughness parameterizations within the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. More than 500 WRF simulations encompassing major hurricane cases and multiple U.S. cities were performed by varying grid resolutions, eddy diffusivity, UHI magnitudes, and surface roughness configurations. By reducing the vertical diffusion in hurricane simulations, hurricane intensity forecasts improved by ~38% compared to the default PBL schemes in five cases, demonstrating the deficiency of existing parameterizations for rotating cyclonic flows. Our urban simulations also showed that incorporating proper UHI representations in Houston and Dallas led to ~50% and ~12% enhancements in particulate matter and ozone forecasts, respectively, as more realistic nighttime warming prevented excessive aerosol accumulation. Additionally, a novel City-wide Enhanced Directional-Adjusted Roughness (CEDAR) parameterization was introduced that improved surface wind forecasts by ~54% and enhanced the prediction of vertical profiles of winds by ~12%, demonstrating the significance of accounting for upwind surface heterogeneities. The dissertation results collectively highlight that improving PBL processes in weather/climate models can considerably reduce forecasting errors in regular and extreme weather events. Our findings guide the future development of advanced PBL schemes that account for rotation, UHI effects, and surface roughness, thereby improving weather and air quality predictions across diverse environments. The results will be helpful to enhance operational forecasting models, which ultimately could mitigate public health risks, and optimize urban design and hurricane preparedness strategies. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, https://cdn.asce.org/asce-conferences/emi-conference.org/s3fs-public/inline-files/ASCE_EMI_2023_Book_of_Abstracts_V3_0.pdf?VersionId=l4CNLiuiZqa5faOlEv0kMg4X5cN7rPCq?VersionId=l4CNLiuiZqa5faOlEv0kMg4X5cN7rPCq)
    Recent studies have shown that climate change and global warming considerably increase the risks of hurricane winds, floods, and storm surges in coastal communities. Turbulent processes in Hurricane Boundary Layers (HBLs) play a major role in hurricane dynamics and intensification. Most of the existing turbulence parameterizations in the current numerical weather prediction (NWP) models rely on the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) schemes. Previous studies (Zhang 2010; Momen et al. 2021) showed that there is a significant distinction between turbulence characteristics in HBLs and regular atmospheric boundary layers (ABLs) due to the strong rotational effects of hurricane flows. Nevertheless, such differences are not considered in the current schemes of NWPs, and they are primarily designed and tested for regular ABLs. In this talk, we aim to bridge this knowledge gap by conducting new hurricane simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model as well as large-eddy simulations. We investigate the role of the PBL parameterizations and momentum roughness length in multiple hurricanes by probing the parameter space of the problem. Our simulations have shown that the most widely used WRF PBL schemes do not capture the hurricane intensification properly and underestimate their intensity. We will present that decreasing the roughness length close to the values of observational estimates and theoretical hurricane intensity models in high wind regimes (≳ 45 m s-1) led to significant improvements in the intensity forecasts of strong hurricanes. Furthermore, by decreasing the existing vertical diffusion values, on average more than 20% improvements in hurricane intensity forecasts were obtained compared to the default runs. Our results provide new insights into the role of turbulence parameterizations in hurricane dynamics and can be employed to improve the accuracy of real hurricane forecasts. The implications of these results and improvements for coastal resiliency and fluid-structure interactions will also be discussed. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email