skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: An evolving perspective on the dynamic brain: Notes from the Brain Conference on Dynamics of the brain: Temporal aspects of computation
Award ID(s):
1934568
PAR ID:
10282339
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
European Journal of Neuroscience
Volume:
53
Issue:
11
ISSN:
0953-816X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3511 to 3524
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
  2. Abstract The heterogeneity of brain imaging methods in neuroscience provides rich data that cannot be captured by a single technique, and our interpretations benefit from approaches that enable easy comparison both within and across different data types. For example, comparing brain-wide neural dynamics across experiments and aligning such data to anatomical resources, such as gene expression patterns or connectomes, requires precise alignment to a common set of anatomical coordinates. However, this is challenging because registeringin vivofunctional imaging data toex vivoreference atlases requires accommodating differences in imaging modality, microscope specification, and sample preparation. We overcome these challenges inDrosophilaby building anin vivoreference atlas from multiphoton-imaged brains, called the Functional Drosophila Atlas (FDA). We then develop a two-step pipeline, BrIdge For Registering Over Statistical Templates (BIFROST), for transforming neural imaging data into this common space and for importingex vivoresources such as connectomes. Using genetically labeled cell types as ground truth, we demonstrate registration with a precision of less than 10 microns. Overall, BIFROST provides a pipeline for registering functional imaging datasets in the fly, both within and across experiments. SignificanceLarge-scale functional imaging experiments inDrosophilahave given us new insights into neural activity in various sensory and behavioral contexts. However, precisely registering volumetric images from different studies has proven challenging, limiting quantitative comparisons of data across experiments. Here, we address this limitation by developing BIFROST, a registration pipeline robust to differences across experimental setups and datasets. We benchmark this pipeline by genetically labeling cell types in the fly brain and demonstrate sub-10 micron registration precision, both across specimens and across laboratories. We further demonstrate accurate registration betweenin-vivobrain volumes and ultrastructural connectomes, enabling direct structure-function comparisons in future experiments. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract The avian head is unique among living reptiles in its combination of relatively large brain and eyes, coupled with relatively small adductor jaw muscles. These derived proportions lend themselves to a trade‐off hypothesis, wherein adductor size was reduced over evolutionary time as a means (or as a consequence) of neurosensory expansion. In this study, we examine this evolutionary hypothesis through the lens of development by describing the jaw‐adductor anatomy of developing chickens,Gallus gallus, and comparing the volumetric expansion of these developing muscles with growth trajectories of the brain and eye. Under the trade‐off hypothesis, we predicted that the jaw muscles would grow with negative allometry relative to brain and eyes, and that osteological signatures of a relatively large adductor system, as found in most nonavian dinosaurs, would be differentially expressed in younger chicks. Results did not meet these expectations, at least not generally, with muscle growth exhibiting positive allometry relative to that of brain and eye. We propose three, nonmutually exclusive explanations: (1) these systems do not compete for space, (2) these systems competed for space in the evolutionary past, and growth of the jaw muscles was truncated early in development (paedomorphosis), and (3) trade‐offs in developmental investment in these systems are limited temporally to the perinatal period. These explanations are considered in light of the fossil record, and most notably the skull of the stem birdIchthyornis, which exhibits an interesting combination of plesiomorphically large adductor chamber and apomorphically large brain. 
    more » « less