An official website of the United States government
Synopsis Trade-offs resulting from the high demand of offspring production are a central focus of many subdisciplines within the field of biology. Yet, despite the historical and current interest on this topic, large gaps in our understanding of whole-organism trade-offs that occur in reproducing individuals remain, particularly as it relates to the nuances associated with female reproduction. This volume of Integrative and Comparative Biology (ICB) contains a series of papers that focus on reviewing trade-offs from the female-centered perspective of biology (i.e., a perspective that places female reproductive biology at the center of the topic being investigated or discussed). These papers represent some of the work showcased during our symposium held at the 2024 meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (SICB) in Seattle, Washington. In this roundtable discussion, we use a question-and-answer format to capture the diverse perspectives and voices involved in our symposium. We hope that the dialogue featured in this discussion will be used to motivate researchers interested in understanding trade-offs in reproducing females and provide guidance on future research endeavors.
more »
« less
It Takes Two to Tango: Including a Female Perspective in Reproductive Biology
Synopsis Like many scientific disciplines, the field of reproductive biology is subject to biases in terminology and research foci. For example, females are often described as coy and passive players in reproductive behaviors and are termed “promiscuous” if they engage in extra-pair copulations. Males on the other hand are viewed as actively holding territories and fighting with other males. Males are termed “multiply mating” if they mate with multiple females. Similarly, textbooks often illustrate meiosis as it occurs in males but not females. This edition of Integrative and Comparative Biology (ICB) includes a series of papers that focus on reproduction from the female perspective. These papers represent a subset of the work presented in our symposium and complementary sessions on female reproductive biology. In this round table discussion, we use a question and answer format to leverage the diverse perspectives and voices involved with the symposium in an exploration of theoretical, cultural, pedagogical, and scientific issues related to the study of female biology. We hope this dialog will provide a stepping-stone toward moving reproductive science and teaching to a more inclusive and objective framework.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1907134
- PAR ID:
- 10282499
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Volume:
- 60
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1540-7063
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 796 to 813
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Female mammals employ reproductive strategies (e.g., internal gestation) that result in power asymmetries specific to intersexual dyads. Because the number of eggs available for fertilization at any given time for most mammals is quite limited, having a fertilizable egg is potentially an important source of economic power for females. Control over mating opportunities is a source of intersexual leverage for female Verreaux’s sifaka ( Propithecus verreauxi ). We examined economic factors thought to influence the value of mating opportunities, and, thus, the extent of female leverage: kinship and market effects. Using a longitudinal dataset of agonistic interactions collected during focal animal sampling of all adult individuals in 10 social groups from 2008 to 2019, we tested the effects of relatedness, female parity, reproductive season, and adult sex ratio (population and group) on (1) the direction of submissive signaling and (2) which sex won a contested resource. While 96% of the acts of submission were directed from males toward females, females only won a third of their conflicts with males. Thus, our study has implications for evolutionary explanations of female-biased power. If female power evolved due to their greater need for food and other resources, then intersexual conflicts would be expected to result in males more consistently relinquishing control of resources. As expected, males were more likely to chatter submissively toward successful mothers, during the mating season, and when the sex ratio was male-biased. Although females generally had less power to win a conflict when their fertilizable egg was less valuable (when they were nulliparous or unsuccessful mothers or when interacting with male kin) and with an increasing female-bias in the sex ratio, this ability to win additionally was influenced by which sex initiated the conflict. Our study demonstrates that female leverage can be influenced by the supply and demand for mating opportunities, but evoking submission does not translate into winning a resource. Indeed, intersexual power is dynamic, contextual, and dependent on the individuals in the dyad.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Male and female moths communicate in complex ways to search for and to select a mate. In a process termed calling, females emit small quantities of pheromones, generating plumes that spread in the environment. Males detect the plume through their antennae and navigate toward the female. The reproductive process is marked by female choice and male–male competition, since multiple males aim to reach the female but only the first can mate with her. This provides an opportunity for female selection on male traits such as chemosensitivity to pheromone molecules and mobility. We develop a mathematical framework to investigate the overall mating likelihood, the mean first arrival time, and the quality of the first male to reach the female for four experimentally observed female calling strategies unfolding over a typical one-week mating period. We present both analytical solutions of a simplified model as well as results from agent-based numerical simulations. Our findings suggest that, by adjusting call times and the amount of released pheromone, females can optimize the mating process. In particular, shorter calling times and lower pheromone titers at onset of the mating period that gradually increase over time allow females to aim for higher-quality males while still ensuring that mating occurs by the end of the mating period.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Due to extreme incongruence in parental investment, the potential for sexual conflict in orangutan reproductive strategies is high. Female orangutans prefer flanged males, but with intense male-male competition and sexual coercion, it is unclear how females are able to exert choice. We hypothesized that female orangutans use initiation and maintenance of associations with preferred males as a mechanism of female choice. We used encounter rates and behavioral measures of proximity maintenance to distinguish between the role of female choice and male coercion in male-female associations in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. From May 2018-April 2019, we collected data on initiation, termination, and proximity maintenance during associations between males and cycling females (females without dependent offspring or with offspring over 6 years old). Encounters between cycling females and flanged males were more likely to be female-initiated (83.3%), while encounters with unflanged males were more likely to be male-initiated (80%) (N=16, p=0.035, Fisher’s exact test). Additionally, the Brown Index indicates significantly more female proximity maintenance when cycling females associated with flanged males than unflanged males (N=33, W = 198.5, p= 0.012). However, using long-term data on male-female associations, we found that dyads of flanged males and females were less likely to encounter other males compared to dyads of unflanged males and females (N=542, χ2= 3.3051, df=1, p=0.035). This indicates that flanged males may also use associations to mate guard females. These data indicate that there are behavioral manifestations of both female choice and male coercion in orangutan associations. Funders: NSF (DGE-1247312, BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199), Boston University, Leakey Foundation, Disney Conservation Fund, and US Fish and Wildlife Service (F18AP00898)more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Due to extreme incongruence in parental investment, the potential for sexual conflict in orangutan reproductive strategies is high. Female orangutans prefer flanged males, but with intense male-male competition and sexual coercion, it is unclear how females are able to exert choice. We hypothesized that female orangutans use initiation and maintenance of associations with preferred males as a mechanism of female choice. We used encounter rates and behavioral measures of proximity maintenance to distinguish between the role of female choice and male coercion in male-female associations in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. From May 2018-April 2019, we collected data on initiation, termination, and proximity maintenance during associations between males and cycling females (females without dependent offspring or with offspring over 6 years old). Encounters between cycling females and flanged males were more likely to be female-initiated (83.3%), while encounters with unflanged males were more likely to be male-initiated (80%) (N=16, p=0.035, Fisher’s exact test). Additionally, the Brown Index indicates significantly more female proximity maintenance when cycling females associated with flanged males than unflanged males (N=33, W = 198.5, p= 0.012). However, using long-term data on male-female associations, we found that dyads of flanged males and females were less likely to encounter other males compared to dyads of unflanged males and females (N=542, χ2= 3.3051, df=1, p=0.035). This indicates that flanged males may also use associations to mate guard females. These data indicate that there are behavioral manifestations of both female choice and male coercion in orangutan associations. Funders: NSF (DGE-1247312, BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199), Boston University, Leakey Foundation, Disney Conservation Fund, and US Fish and Wildlife Service (F18AP00898)more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa084
