Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Is Community Relevance Enough? Civic and Science Identity Impact of Microbiology CUREs Focused on Community Environmental Justice
Title: Is Community Relevance Enough? Civic and Science Identity Impact of Microbiology CUREs Focused on Community Environmental Justice
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) often involve a component where the outcomes of student research are broadly relevant to outside stakeholders. We wanted to see if building courses around an environmental justice issue relevant to the local community would impact students’ sense of civic engagement and appreciation of the relevance of scientific research to the community. In this quasi-experimental study, we assessed civic engagement and scientific identity gains ( N = 98) using pre- and post-semester surveys and open-ended interview responses in three different CUREs taught simultaneously at three different universities. All three CURES were focused on an environmental heavy metal pollution issue predominantly affecting African–Americans in Birmingham, Alabama. While we found increases in students’ sense of science efficacy and identity, our team was unable to detect meaningful changes in civic engagement levels, all of which were initially quite high. However, interviews suggested that students were motivated to do well in their research because the project was of interest to outside stakeholders. Our observations suggest that rather than directly influencing students’ civic engagement, the “broadly relevant” component of our CUREs engaged their pre-existing high levels of engagement to increase their engagement with the material, possibly influencing gains in science efficacy and science identity. Our observations are consistent with broader community relevance being an important component of CURE success, but do not support our initial hypothesis that CURE participation would influence students’ attitudes toward the civic importance of science.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1826988
PAR ID:
10284501
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Microbiology
Volume:
11
ISSN:
1664-302X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Society for the Advancement of Biological Education Research)
    Beyond the Classroom: Initial Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study of External Validation of Undergraduate Research at a Community College: Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are a recognized high-impact practice with documented positive impacts on students’ acculturation into science. They provide a scalable mechanism for students at two-year colleges to gain early experiences in research, but unlike students in a university-level URE, there is rarely an opportunity to formally present the work and have it evaluated and validated by an external audience. We used a validated pre and post Likert-style instrument (TIMSI) plus focus group interviews to evaluate whether adding an element of external validation to a CURE curriculum leads to gains in measures of Science Identity, Values, Self-Efficacy, and career intention when compared with students in CURE-only courses. We surveyed 81 community college STEM students in CURE courses both with (n = 41) and without (n = 40) an external validation component, which in this study was the presentation of research results at a public symposium. Bayesian regression models were used to test for the impact of the symposium experience. We collected qualitative data during two student focus groups totaling ten Undergraduate Research Symposium participants. The focus group protocols were co-designed by the evaluation team and principal investigators. The evaluation team began with a coding scheme to identify the factors that influenced year one implementation and early outcomes. Using Dedoose analytical software, the team selected passages from the transcripts and labeled them with corresponding codes that reflected elements of the logic model. Likert data results show positive effects of external validation on all dimensions with the exception of career intention. Focus groups analyses identified four key findings about students’ external validation CURE experiences. First, students felt valued and supported through mentorship, guidance, and inclusive learning environments. Second, students gained confidence by engaging in independent, hands-on research and problem-solving. Third, students’ scientific identity was bolstered by their perseverance through CURE activities. Fourth, students’ sense of belonging included their engagement with peers during the spring Undergraduate Research Symposium. Although these results are preliminary and are limited by a low sample size and potential selection effects in survey and symposium participation, our data suggests that adding an external validation component to existing CUREs could have significant impact on future STEM fields and offers a potential mechanism for instructors to improve the CURE experience for their students, particularly with respect to students at non-research institutions. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education)
    Wang, Jack (Ed.)
    The Fly-CURE is a genetics-focused multi-institutional Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) that provides undergraduate students with hands-on research experiences within a course. Through the Fly-CURE, undergraduate students at diverse types of higher education institutions across the United States map and characterize novel mutants isolated from a genetic screen in Drosophila melanogaster . To date, more than 20 mutants have been studied across 20 institutions, and our scientific data have led to eleven publications with more than 500 students as authors. To evaluate the impact of the Fly-CURE experience on students, we developed and validated assessment tools to identify students’ perceived research self-efficacy, sense of belonging in science, and intent to pursue additional research opportunities. Our data, collected over three academic years and involving 14 institutions and 480 students, show gains in these metrics after completion of the Fly-CURE across all student subgroups analyzed, including comparisons of gender, academic status, racial and ethnic groups, and parents’ educational background. Importantly, our data also show differential gains in the areas of self-efficacy and interest in seeking additional research opportunities between Fly-CURE students with and without prior research experience, illustrating the positive impact of research exposure (dosage) on student outcomes. Altogether, our data indicate that the Fly-CURE experience has a significant impact on students’ efficacy with research methods, sense of belonging to the scientific research community, and interest in pursuing additional research experiences. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, National Association of Research in Science Teaching)
    External Validation of Undergraduate Research Leads to Gains in Science Identity, Value, and Self-Efficacy: Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are a recognized high-impact practice with documented positive impacts on students’ acculturation into science. They provide a scalable mechanism for students at two-year colleges to gain early experiences in research, but unlike students in a university-level URE, there is rarely an opportunity to formally present the work and have it evaluated and validated by an external audience. In this study we explore whether adding an element of external validation to a CURE curriculum leads to gains in measures of STEM identity when compared with students in CURE-only courses. We identified 81students in CURE courses both with (n = 41) and without (n = 40) an external validation component, which in this study was the presentation of research results at a public symposium. We used a validated pre and post Likert-style instrument (TIMSI) to measure changes in Science Identity, Values, Self-Efficacy, and career intention. Bayesian regression models were used to test for the impact of the symposium experience. Results show positive effects of external validation on all dimensions with the exception of career intention. Results are preliminary and are limited by a low sample size and the lack of qualitative data, which is forthcoming. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, PLOS ONE)
    Rumain, Barbara T. (Ed.)
    Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are laboratory courses that integrate broadly relevant problems, discovery, use of the scientific process, collaboration, and iteration to provide more students with research experiences than is possible in individually mentored faculty laboratories. Members of the national Malate dehydrogenase CUREs Community (MCC) investigated the differences in student impacts between traditional laboratory courses (control), a short module CURE within traditional laboratory courses (mCURE), and CUREs lasting the entire course (cCURE). The sample included approximately 1,500 students taught by 22 faculty at 19 institutions. We investigated course structures for elements of a CURE and student outcomes including student knowledge, student learning, student attitudes, interest in future research, overall experience, future GPA, and retention in STEM. We also disaggregated the data to investigate whether underrepresented minority (URM) outcomes were different from White and Asian students. We found that the less time students spent in the CURE the less the course was reported to contain experiences indicative of a CURE. The cCURE imparted the largest impacts for experimental design, career interests, and plans to conduct future research, while the remaining outcomes were similar between the three conditions. The mCURE student outcomes were similar to control courses for most outcomes measured in this study. However, for experimental design, the mCURE was not significantly different than either the control or cCURE. Comparing URM and White/Asian student outcomes indicated no difference for condition, except for interest in future research. Notably, the URM students in the mCURE condition had significantly higher interest in conducting research in the future than White/Asian students. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, Essays in Biochemistry)
    Provost, Joseph; Cornely, Kathleen; Parente, Amy; Peterson, Celeste; Springer, Amy (Ed.)
    Abstract College science programs exhibit high rates of student attrition, especially among Students of Color, women, members of the LGBTQ+ community, and those with disabilities. Many of the reasons students choose to leave or feel pushed out of science can be mitigated through participation in faculty-mentored research. However, faculty resources are limited, and not every student has access to faculty mentoring due to systemic or structural barriers. By bringing authentic scientific research into the classroom context, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) expand the number of students who participate in research and provide benefits similar to faculty-mentored research. Instructors also benefit from teaching CUREs. Using a systematic review of 14 manuscripts concerning the Malate Dehydrogenase CUREs Community (MCC) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) CUREs, we demonstrate that CUREs can be implemented flexibly, are authentic research experiences, generate new scientific discoveries, and improve student outcomes. Additionally, CURE communities offer substantial advantages to faculty wishing to implement CUREs. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email