Making sense of what to do about the many daunting socio-environmental issues that we face will require intercultural understanding, openness to learning, and a capacity to draw on the strengths of multiple perspectives and to recognize limitations of dominant perspectives such as Eurocentric science. Navigating multiple perspectives in the school science classroom can be particularly treacherous for Indigenous students, whose cultural worldviews have often been excluded or denigrated in Eurocentric educational contexts. We present findings from a partnership project that is designing, implementing, studying, and refining instructional experiences for middle school students from significantly/predominantly Indigenous communities in Alaska and Hawai’i. This paper describes our efforts to understand project partners’ standpoints, acknowledging that in designing and implementing multi-perspective middle school science instruction, it will be critical to understand the multiple perspectives that we ourselves bring to the work. We present and discuss the views that project partners (including teachers) have shared concerning science, science education, multiple perspectives, and Indigenous cultural integrity and potential consequentiality for the project’s collaborative work. Five prominent themes relate to (1) the challenge of defining Indigenous and Eurocentric science for application in an instructional design context, (2) relationships with place, (3) centrality of language, (4) scaffolding and understanding learning through a multi-perspective lens, and (5) constraints associated with Eurocentric classroom and science contexts.
more »
« less
UNDERSTANDING INSTRUCTIONAL CAPACITY FOR HIGH SCHOOL GEOMETRY AS A SYSTEMIC PROBLEM THROUGH STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
This paper reports an ongoing effort to address the problem of instructional capacity for high school geometry from a systems improvement perspective. In an effort to understand the system that contains the high school geometry instructional capacity problem, we identified key stakeholders and conducted preliminary interviews to learn about the problem from their perspective. We use these interview data to describe the system in more detail and to identify six major factors contributing to the high school geometry instructional capacity problem.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1725837
- PAR ID:
- 10289329
- Editor(s):
- Sacristán, A; Cortés_Zavala, J; Ruiz_Arias, P
- Publisher / Repository:
- Forty_Second_Meeting_of_the_North_American_Chapter_of_the_International_Group_for_the_Psychology_of_Mathematics_Education
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
- ISBN:
- 978-1-7348057-0-3
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 620-627
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Geometry and Geometrical and Spatial Thinking, University Mathematics, Teacher Education - Preservice, Systemic Change
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
E. Barbin, R. Capone (Ed.)Following Felix Klein, an advanced historical standpoint is here presented for teaching college geometry for teachers. Three main ways of developing an advanced historical standpoint are discussed with classroom experiments. One is building connections among geometries by developing an inquiry into definitions of geometric objects such as rhombus, their extensibility with their family relationships across Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries. Second is on the multiplicity and extensibility of transformations as represented by two historical approaches advocated by Klein and Usiskin. The third way to develop an advanced standpoint is by developing a critical look into a geometry practice tracing its change with the reforms in school geometry. The practice of constructions to connect geometry and algebra is impacted by two historical efforts. One is a supportive effort by Hilbert on the practice of constructions by Hilbert’s Algebra of Segments dating back to 1902 to connect geometry and algebra. The other historical reform effort is by School Mathematics Study Groups (SMSG) during 1960s, which led to weakening the axiomatic foundations of the practice of constructability and exactness. The case of SMSG’s angle construction axiom is criticized in their revision of axiomatic foundations of school geometry. Three approaches to develop an advanced standpoint informing research and practice of geometry teacher education towards a more historically connected stance.more » « less
-
As states and districts adopt policies and programs to broaden participation in computer science, there is a growing need to effectively develop and support more computer science teachers. Instructional coaching is a form of professional development that districts can implement to provide ongoing support to teachers. In Chicago, a recent policy change made computer science a high school graduation requirement. The district adopted the Exploring Computer Science (ECS) curriculum and professional development program as the primary means for fulfilling the requirement. As part of the district’s effort to consistently offer equitable computer science experiences for all students, an emphasis was placed on supporting ECS teachers through coaching. Over the past five years, the district developed, implemented, and refined an instructional coaching model for ECS teachers. The coaching model continues to scale up across the district, with over 50 teachers participating in the 2019-2020 school year. The coaching team also adapted the model in response to the shift to remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, the authors share details of the ECS coaching model in Chicago, its impact, and lessons learned from the past five years of implementation.more » « less
-
Growing awareness of both the demand for artificial intelligence (AI) expertise and the societal impacts of AI systems has led to calls to integrate learning of ethics alongside learning of technical skills in AI courses and pathways. In this paper, we discuss our experiences developing and piloting the TechHive AI curriculum for high school youth that integrates AI ethics and technical learning. The design of the curriculum was guided by the following pedagogical goals: (1) to respond to the capacity-building need for critical sociotechnical competencies in AI workforce pathways; and (2) to broaden participation in AI pathways through intentional instructional design to center equity in learning experiences. We provide an overview of the 30-hour learning sequence’s instructional design, and our “4D Framework,” which we use as a heuristic to help students conceptualize and inspect AI systems.We then provide a focused description of one of three chapters that make up the sequence. Finally, we present evidence of promise from an exploratory study of TechHive AI with a small sample of students, and discuss insights from implementation, including from our use of established resources for AI learning within the learning sequence as well as those created by our team.more » « less
-
This is part of a larger effort bringing together a diverse design team, to create curriculum integrating computer coding and middle-school general-mathematics. The goal was to enhance the instruction of students that have been traditionally underserved in mathematics by using computer science ideas found in coding to complement, reinforce, and build on mathematics ideas in a meaningful way. The development of modules was guided by the principles of Design-Based Research and Realistic Mathematics Education instructional design heuristics, in particular by drawing on the notion of guided reinvention through emergent models. Here we present the design principles that emerged from the first half of the effort with the hopes of informing other projects that integrate coding and mathematics learning.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

