skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Decision-Making in the Human-Machine Interface
If our choices make us who we are, then what does that mean when these choices are made in the human-machine interface? Developing a clear understanding of how human decision making is influenced by automated systems in the environment is critical because, as human-machine interfaces and assistive robotics become even more ubiquitous in everyday life, many daily decisions will be an emergent result of the interactions between the human and the machine – not stemming solely from the human. For example, choices can be influenced by the relative locations and motor costs of the response options, as well as by the timing of the response prompts. In drift diffusion model simulations of response-prompt timing manipulations, we find that it is only relatively equibiased choices that will be successfully influenced by this kind of perturbation. However, with drift diffusion model simulations of motor cost manipulations, we find that even relatively biased choices can still show some influence of the perturbation. We report the results of a two-alternative forced-choice experiment with a computer mouse modified to have a subtle velocity bias in a pre-determined direction for each trial, inducing an increased motor cost to move the cursor away from the pre-designated target direction. With queries that have each been normed in advance to be equibiased in people’s preferences, the participant will often begin their mouse movement before their cognitive choice has been finalized, and the directional bias in the mouse velocity exerts a small but significant influence on their final choice. With queries that are not equibiased, a similar influence is observed. By exploring the synergies that are developed between humans and machines and tracking their temporal dynamics, this work aims to provide insight into our evolving decisions.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1633722
PAR ID:
10291349
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Psychology
Volume:
12
ISSN:
1664-1078
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Management Science)
    Chen, Yan (Ed.)
    Do people have well-defined social preferences waiting to be applied when making decisions? Or do they have to construct social decisions on the spot? If the latter, how are those decisions influenced by the way in which information is acquired and evaluated? These temporal dynamics are fundamental to understanding how people trade off selfishness and prosociality in organizations and societies. Here, we investigate how the temporal dynamics of the choice process shape social decisions in three studies using response times and mouse tracking. In the first study, participants made binary decisions in mini-dictator games with and without time constraints. Using mouse trajectories and a starting time drift diffusion model, we find that, regardless of time constraints, selfish participants were delayed in processing others’ payoffs, whereas the opposite was true for prosocial participants. The independent mouse trajectory and computational modeling analyses identified consistent measures of the delay between considering one’s own and others’ payoffs (self-onset delay, SOD). This measure correlated with individual differences in prosociality and predicted heterogeneous effects of time constraints on preferences. We confirmed these results in two additional studies, one a purely behavioral study in which participants made decisions by pressing computer keys, and the other a replication of the mouse-tracking study. Together, these results indicate that people preferentially process either self or others’ payoffs early in the choice process. The intrachoice dynamics are crucial in shaping social preferences and might be manipulated via nudge policies (e.g., manipulating the display order or saliency of self and others’ outcomes) for behavior in managerial or other contexts. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decisions analysis. Funding: F. Chen acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71803174 and 72173113]. Z. Zhu acknowledges support from the Ministry of Science and Technology [Grant STI 2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0200409]. Q. Shen acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71971199 and 71942004]. I. Krajbich acknowledges support from the U.S. National Science Foundation [Grant 2148982]. This work was also supported by the James McKeen Cattell Fund. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4732 . 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Nature Communications)
    Abstract Intertemporal choices – decisions that play out over time – pervade our life. Thus, how people make intertemporal choices is a fundamental question. Here, we investigate the role of attribute latency (the time between when people start to process different attributes) in shaping intertemporal preferences using five experiments with choices between smaller-sooner and larger-later rewards. In the first experiment, we identify attribute latencies using mouse-trajectories and find that they predict individual differences in choices, response times, and changes across time constraints. In the other four experiments we test the causal link from attribute latencies to choice, staggering the display of the attributes. This changes attribute latencies and intertemporal preferences. Displaying the amount information first makes people more patient, while displaying time information first does the opposite. These findings highlight the importance of intra-choice dynamics in shaping intertemporal choices and suggest that manipulating attribute latency may be a useful technique for nudging. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; (, Nyssa)
    Human decision making behavior is observed with choice-response time data during psychological experiments. Drift-diffusion models of this data consist of a Wiener first-passage time (WFPT) distribution and are described by cognitive parameters: drift rate, boundary separation, and starting point. These estimated parameters are of interest to neuroscientists as they can be mapped to features of cognitive processes of decision making (such as speed, caution, and bias) and related to brain activity. The observed patterns of RT also reflect the variability of cognitive processes from trial to trial mediated by neural dynamics. We adapted a SincNet-based shallow neural network architecture to fit the Drift-Diffusion model using EEG signals on every experimental trial. The model consists of a SincNet layer, a depthwise spatial convolution layer, and two separate fully connected layers that predict drift rate and boundary for each trial in-parallel. The SincNet layer parametrized the kernels in order to directly learn the low and high cutoff frequencies of bandpass filters that are applied to the EEG data to predict drift and boundary parameters. During training, model parameters were updated by minimizing the negative log likelihood function of WFPT distribution given trial RT. We developed separate decision SincNet models for each participant performing a two-alternative forced-choice task by discriminating whether a Gabor patch presented with noise is high or low spatial frequency. Our results showed that single-trial estimates of drift and boundary performed better at predicting RTs than the median estimates in both training and test data sets, suggesting that our model can successfully use EEG features to estimate meaningful single-trial Diffusion model parameters. Furthermore the shallow SincNet architecture identified time windows of information processing related to evidence accumulation and caution and the EEG frequency bands that reflect these processes within each participant. 
    more » « less
  4. (, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks)
    Human decision making behavior is observed with choice-response time data during psychological experiments. Drift-diffusion models of this data consist of a Wiener first-passage time (WFPT) distribution and are described by cognitive parameters: drift rate, boundary separation, and starting point. These estimated parameters are of interest to neuroscientists as they can be mapped to features of cognitive processes of decision making (such as speed, caution, and bias) and related to brain activity. The observed patterns of RT also reflect the variability of cognitive processes from trial to trial mediated by neural dynamics. We adapted a SincNet-based shallow neural network architecture to fit the Drift-Diffusion model using EEG signals on every experimental trial. The model consists of a SincNet layer, a depthwise spatial convolution layer, and two separate FC layers that predict drift rate and boundary for each trial in-parallel. The SincNet layer parametrized the kernels in order to directly learn the low and high cutoff frequencies of bandpass filters that are applied to the EEG data to predict drift and boundary parameters. During training, model parameters were updated by minimizing the negative log likelihood function of WFPT distribution given trial RT. We developed separate decision SincNet models for each participant performing a two-alternative forced-choice task. Our results showed that single-trial estimates of drift and boundary performed better at predicting RTs than the median estimates in both training and test data sets, suggesting that our model can successfully use EEG features to estimate meaningful single-trial Diffusion model parameters. Furthermore, the shallow SincNet architecture identified time windows of information processing related to evidence accumulation and caution and the EEG frequency bands that reflect these processes within each participant. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, PLOS ONE)
    Nooripour, Roghieh (Ed.)
    School choice initiatives–which empower parents to choose which schools their children attend–are built on the assumptions that parents know what features of a school are most important to their family and that they are capable of focusing on the most important features when they make their decisions. However, decades of psychological research suggest that decision makers lack metacognitive knowledge of the factors that influence their decisions. We sought to reconcile this discrepancy between the policy assumptions and the psychological research. To do so, we asked participants to complete Choice-Based Conjoint surveys in which they made series of choices between different hypothetical schools. We then asked participants to self-report the weight they placed on each attribute when making their choices. Across four studies, we found that participants did not know how much weight they had placed on various school attributes. Average correlations between stated and revealed weights ranged fromr= .34–.54. Stated weights predicted different choices than revealed weights in 16.41–20.63% of decisions. These metacognitive limitations persisted regardless of whether the participants were parents or non-parents (Study 1a/1b), the nature of the attributes that participants used to evaluate alternatives (Study 2), and whether or not decision makers had access to school ratings that could be used as metacognitive aids (Study 3). In line with prior psychological research–and in contract to policy assumptions–these findings demonstrate that decision makers do not have particularly strong metacognitive knowledge of the factors that influence their school choice decisions. As a result, parents making school choice decisions are likely to seek out and use the wrong information, thus leading to suboptimal school choices. Future research should replicate these results in more ecologically valid samples and test new approaches to school choice that account for these metacognitive limitations. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email