More Like this

1. ‘Calcium is life’

   https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery279  

   Feijó, José A; Wudick, Michael M (July 2018, Journal of Experimental Botany)
2. A Life Outside

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-032223-014227  

   Koehl, MAR (January 2024, Annual Review of Marine Science)

   How do the morphologies of organisms affect their physical interactions with the environment and other organisms? My research in marine systems couples field studies of the physical habitats, life history strategies, and ecological interactions of organisms with laboratory analyses of their biomechanics. Here, I review how we pursued answers to three questions about marine organisms: ( a) how benthic organisms withstand and utilize the water moving around them, ( b) how the interaction between swimming and turbulent ambient water flow affects where small organisms go, and ( c) how hairy appendages catch food and odors. I also discuss the importance of different types of mentors, the roadblocks for women in science when I started my career, the challenges and delights of interdisciplinary research, and my quest to understand how I see the world as a dyslexic. 

   more » « less
3. A life for a (shorter) life: The reproduction–longevity trade-off

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2405089121  

   Takeshita, Rafaela_S C (April 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
4. The Pace of Life: Metabolic Energy, Biological Time, and Life History

   https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icac058  

   Brown, James H; Burger, Joseph R; Hou, Chen; Hall, Charles A (July 2022, Integrative and Comparative Biology)

   Synopsis New biophysical theory and electronic databases raise the prospect of deriving fundamental rules of life, a conceptual framework for how the structures and functions of molecules, cells, and individual organisms give rise to emergent patterns and processes of ecology, evolution, and biodiversity. This framework is very general, applying across taxa of animals from 10–10 g protists to 108 g whales, and across environments from deserts and abyssal depths to rain forests and coral reefs. It has several hallmarks: (1) Energy is the ultimate limiting resource for organisms and the currency of biological fitness. (2) Most organisms are nearly equally fit, because in each generation at steady state they transfer an equal quantity of energy (˜22.4 kJ/g) and biomass (˜1 g/g) to surviving offspring. This is the equal fitness paradigm (EFP). (3) The enormous diversity of life histories is due largely to variation in metabolic rates (e.g., energy uptake and expenditure via assimilation, respiration, and production) and biological times (e.g., generation time). As in standard allometric and metabolic theory, most physiological and life history traits scale approximately as quarter-power functions of body mass, m (rates as ∼m–1/4 and times as ∼m1/4), and as exponential functions of temperature. (4) Time is the fourth dimension of life. Generation time is the pace of life. (5) There is, however, considerable variation not accounted for by the above scalings and existing theories. Much of this “unexplained” variation is due to natural selection on life history traits to adapt the biological times of generations to the clock times of geochronological environmental cycles. (6) Most work on biological scaling and metabolic ecology has focused on respiration rate. The emerging synthesis applies conceptual foundations of energetics and the EFP to shift the focus to production rate and generation time. 

   more » « less
5. The sizes of life

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283020  

   Tekwa, Eden W.; Catalano, Katrina A.; Bazzicalupo, Anna L.; O’Connor, Mary I.; Pinsky, Malin L. (March 2023, PLOS ONE)

   Dam, Hans G. (Ed.)

   Recent research has revealed the diversity and biomass of life across ecosystems, but how that biomass is distributed across body sizes of all living things remains unclear. We compile the present-day global body size-biomass spectra for the terrestrial, marine, and subterranean realms. To achieve this compilation, we pair existing and updated biomass estimates with previously uncatalogued body size ranges across all free-living biological groups. These data show that many biological groups share similar ranges of body sizes, and no single group dominates size ranges where cumulative biomass is highest. We then propagate biomass and size uncertainties and provide statistical descriptions of body size-biomass spectra across and within major habitat realms. Power laws show exponentially decreasing abundance (exponent -0.9±0.02 S.D.,R²= 0.97) and nearly equal biomass (exponent 0.09±0.01,R²= 0.56) across log size bins, which resemble previous aquatic size spectra results but with greater organismal inclusivity and global coverage. In contrast, a bimodal Gaussian mixture model describes the biomass pattern better (R²= 0.86) and suggests small (~10⁻¹⁵g) and large (~10⁷g) organisms outweigh other sizes by one order magnitude (15 and 65 Gt versus ~1 Gt per log size). The results suggest that the global body size-biomass relationships is bimodal, but substantial one-to-two orders-of-magnitude uncertainty mean that additional data will be needed to clarify whether global-scale universal constraints or local forces shape these patterns. 

   more » « less