skip to main content


Title: Asymptotically Optimal Kinodynamic Planning Using Bundles of Edges
Using sampling to estimate the connectivity of high-dimensional configuration spaces has been the theoretical underpinning for effective sampling-based motion planners. Typical strategies either build a roadmap, or a tree as the underlying search structure that connects sampled configurations, with a focus on guaranteeing completeness and optimality as the number of samples tends to infinity. Roadmap-based planners allow preprocessing the space, and can solve multiple kinematic motion planning problems, but need a steering function to connect pairwise-states. Such steering functions are difficult to define for kinodynamic systems, and limit the applicability of roadmaps to motion planning problems with dynamical systems. Recent advances in the analysis of single query tree-based planners has shown that forward search trees based on random propagations are asymptotically optimal. The current work leverages these recent results and proposes a multi-query framework for kinodynamic planning. Bundles of kinodynamic edges can be sampled to cover the state space before the query arrives. Then, given a motion planning query, the connectivity of the state space reachable from the start can be recovered from a forward search tree reasoning about a local neighborhood of the edge bundle from each tree node. The work demonstrates theoretically that considering any constant radial neighborhood during this process is sufficient to guarantee asymptotic optimality. Experimental validation in five and twelve dimensional simulated systems also highlights the ability of the proposed edge bundles to express high-quality kinodynamic solutions. Our approach consistently finds higher quality solutions compared to SST, and RRT, often with faster initial solution times. The strategy of sampling kinodynamic edges is demonstrated to be a promising new paradigm.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2008720
NSF-PAR ID:
10301750
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
9988 to 9994
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Sampling-based motion planners such as RRT* and BIT*, when applied to kinodynamic motion planning, rely on steering functions to generate time-optimal solutions connecting sampled states. Implementing exact steering functions requires either analytical solutions to the time-optimal control problem, or nonlinear programming (NLP) solvers to solve the boundary value problem given the system's kinodynamic equations. Unfortunately, analytical solutions are unavailable for many real-world domains, and NLP solvers are prohibitively computationally expensive, hence fast and optimal kinodynamic motion planning remains an open problem. We provide a solution to this problem by introducing State Supervised Steering Function (S3F), a novel approach to learn time-optimal steering functions. S3F is able to produce near-optimal solutions to the steering function orders of magnitude faster than its NLP counterpart. Experiments conducted on three challenging robot domains show that RRT* using S3F significantly outperforms state-of-the-art planning approaches on both solution cost and runtime. We further provide a proof of probabilistic completeness of RRT* modified to use S3F. 
    more » « less
  2. Trajectory optimization o↵ers mature tools for motion planning in high-dimensional spaces under dynamic constraints. However, when facing complex configuration spaces, cluttered with obstacles, roboticists typically fall back to sampling-based planners that struggle in very high dimensions and with continuous di↵erential constraints. Indeed, obstacles are the source of many textbook examples of problematic nonconvexities in the trajectory-optimization prob- lem. Here we show that convex optimization can, in fact, be used to reliably plan trajectories around obstacles. Specifically, we consider planning problems with collision-avoidance constraints, as well as cost penalties and hard constraints on the shape, the duration, and the velocity of the trajectory. Combining the properties of B ́ezier curves with a recently-proposed framework for finding shortest paths in Graphs of Convex Sets (GCS), we formulate the planning problem as a compact mixed-integer optimization. In stark contrast with existing mixed-integer planners, the convex relaxation of our programs is very tight, and a cheap round- ing of its solution is typically sufficient to design globally-optimal trajectories. This reduces the mixed-integer program back to a simple convex optimization, and automatically provides optimality bounds for the planned trajectories. We name the proposed planner GCS, after its underlying optimization framework. We demonstrate GCS in simulation on a variety of robotic platforms, including a quadrotor flying through buildings and a dual-arm manipulator (with fourteen degrees of freedom) moving in a confined space. Using numerical experiments on a seven-degree-of-freedom manipulator, we show that GCS can outperform widely-used sampling-based planners by finding higher-quality trajectories in less time. 
    more » « less
  3. Shell, Dylan A ; Toussaint, Marc (Ed.)
    We present a learning-based approach to prove infeasibility of kinematic motion planning problems. Sampling-based motion planners are effective in high-dimensional spaces but are only probabilistically complete. Consequently, these planners cannot provide a definite answer if no plan exists, which is important for high-level scenarios, such as task-motion planning. We propose a combination of bidirectional sampling-based planning (such as RRT-connect) and machine learning to construct an infeasibility proof alongside the two search trees. An infeasibility proof is a closed manifold in the obstacle region of the configuration space that separates the start and goal into disconnected components of the free configuration space. We train the manifold using common machine learning techniques and then triangulate the manifold into a polytope to prove containment in the obstacle region. Under assumptions about learning hyper-parameters and robustness of configuration space optimization, the output is either an infeasibility proof or a motion plan. We demonstrate proof construction for 3-DOF and 4-DOF manipulators and show improvement over a previous algorithm. 
    more » « less
  4. Inspection planning, the task of planning motions for a robot that enable it to inspect a set of points of interest, has applications in domains such as industrial, field, and medical robotics. Inspection planning can be computationally challenging, as the search space over motion plans grows exponentially with the number of points of interest to inspect. We propose a novel method, Incremental Random Inspection-roadmap Search (IRIS), that computes inspection plans whose length and set of successfully inspected points asymptotically converge to those of an optimal inspection plan. IRIS incrementally densifies a motion-planning roadmap using a sampling-based algorithm and performs efficient near-optimal graph search over the resulting roadmap as it is generated. We prove the resulting algorithm is asymptotically optimal under very general assumptions about the robot and the environment. We demonstrate IRIS’s efficacy on a simulated inspection task with a planar five DOF manipulator, on a simulated bridge inspection task with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), and on a medical endoscopic inspection task for a continuum parallel surgical robot in cluttered human anatomy. In all these systems IRIS computes higher-quality inspection plans orders of magnitudes faster than a prior state-of-the-art method. 
    more » « less
  5. We present a learning-based approach to prove infeasibility of kinematic motion planning problems. Sampling-based motion planners are effective in high-dimensional spaces but are only probabilistically complete. Consequently, these planners cannot provide a definite answer if no plan exists, which is important for high-level scenarios, such as task-motion planning. We apply data generated during multi-directional sampling-based planning (such as PRM) to a machine learning approach to construct an infeasibility proof. An infeasibility proof is a closed manifold in the obstacle region of the configuration space that separates the start and goal into disconnected components of the free configuration space. We train the manifold using common machine learning techniques and then triangulate the manifold into a polytope to prove containment in the obstacle region. Under assumptions about the hyper-parameters and robustness of configuration space optimization, the output is either an infeasibility proof or a motion plan in the limit. We demonstrate proof construction for up to 4-DOF configuration spaces. A large part of the algorithm is parallelizable, which offers potential to address higher dimensional configuration spaces.

     
    more » « less