skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Ordinary Language Philosophy and the Historical Turn in Philosophy of Science
Taking a cue from remarks Kuhn makes in 1990 about the historical turn in philosophy of science, I examine the history of history and philosophy of science within the British philosophical context of the 1950s and early 1960s when ordinary language philosophy’s influence was at its peak. Specifically, I make the case that the ordinary language philosophers’ methodological recommendation to analyze actual linguistic practice influences several prominent criticisms of the deductive-nomological model of scientific explanation and that these criticisms are related to the historical turn in philosophy of science. I think such connections are especially clear in the work of Stephen Toulmin, who taught at Oxford from 1949 to 1954, and Michael Scriven, who completed a dissertation on explanation under Gilbert Ryle in 1956. I also consider Mary Hesse’s appeal to an ordinary language-influenced account of meaning in her account of the role of models in scientific reasoning. I think there are two upshots to my historical sketch. First, it fills out details of the move away from logical positivism to more historical- and practice-focused philosophies of science. Second, questions about linguistic meaning and the proper targets and aims of philosophical analysis are part and parcel of the historical turn, as well as its reception.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1921821
PAR ID:
10309301
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Editor(s):
Schickore, Jutta
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Integrated HPS Conference Proceedings
Volume:
1
Issue:
1
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Design culture is increasingly present within organizations, especially with the rise of UX as a profession. Yet there are often disconnects between the development of a design philosophy and its translation in practice. Students preparing for UX careers are positioned in a liminal space between their educational experience and future practice, and are actively working to build a bridge between their developing philosophy of design and the translation of that philosophy when faced with the complexity of design practice. In this study, we interviewed ten students and practitioners educated within design-oriented HCI programs, focusing on their design philosophy and evaluating how their philosophical beliefs were shaped in practice. Building on prior work on flows of competence, we thematically analyzed these interviews, identifying the philosophical beliefs of these designers and their trajectories of development, adoption, or suppression in industry. We identify opportunities for enhancements to UX educational practices and future research on design complexity in industry contexts. 
    more » « less
  2. We offer philosophical motivations for a method we call Vir- tual World Cognitive Science (VW CogSci), in which re- searchers use virtual embodied agents that are embedded in virtual worlds to explore questions in the field of Cognitive Science. We focus on questions about mental and linguistic representation and the ways that such computational modeling can add rigor to philosophical thought experiments, as well as the terminology used in the scientific study of such represen- tations. We find that this method forces researchers to take a god’s-eye view when describing dynamical relationships be- tween entities in minds and entities in an environment in a way that eliminates the need for problematic talk of belief and con- cept types, such as the belief that cats are silly, and the concept CAT, while preserving belief and concept tokens in individual cognizers’ minds. We conclude with some further key advan- tages of VW CogSci for the scientific study of mental and lin- guistic representation and for Cognitive Science more broadly. 
    more » « less
  3. Schickore, Jutta (Ed.)
    In this paper, I discuss the reception of Kuhn's book on Planck and the quantum. Most criticisms of the book concern, I argue, how to understand Kuhn's notion of a paradigm, and they all read the notion, I claim by means of Joseph Rouse's work, in theory-driven terms. I then show that an alternative reading, in terms of a practice-focused reading of paradigms, is also possible, and is in fact to be preferred, since it is more in line with how Kuhn narrated the quantum-episode, it overcomes most of the criticisms raised against the book, and it allows us to open up new historical-philosophical research directions. 
    more » « less
  4. This paper explores the often assumed but understudied disciplinary assumption in the philosophy of science: that philosophical commitments are uniform within disciplines and vary substantially across them. Preliminary findings from interviews with scientists across diverse disciplines suggest partial endorsement of this assumption. While some philosophical commonalities exist between disciplines, distinctions also prevail. The study highlights the need for further research, including a large-scale survey, to comprehensively examine and understand the philosophical landscape within and between scientific disciplines. 
    more » « less
  5. Schickore, Jutta (Ed.)
    This paper introduces new empirical methods into the philosophy of science as part of broader naturalization efforts which have been championed by some members of the philosophical community. In the beginning, we defend this approach and present the main reasons why new methods such as empirical conceptual analysis with advanced statistical analysis should be adopted and further developed. Next, we proceed to practical examples of how such empirical analysis can be applied to the concept of objectivity and its current understanding by working scientists, and also to the historical-philosophical notion of Crombie’s styles of scientific thinking and Hacking’s styles of styles of reasoning. In conclusion, we assess the utility and limitations of this new approach, particularly the potential of these qualitative and quantitative methods to produce exact and transparent images of a concept’s use in lay or professional target groups. 
    more » « less