More Like this

1. Atmospheric Observations of Weather and Climate

   https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2022.2082369  

   Bluestein, Howard B.; Carr, Frederick H.; Goodman, Steven J. (August 2022, Atmosphere-Ocean)
2. Swift UVOT Grism Observations of Nearby Type Ia Supernovae – I. Observations and Data Reduction

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1420  

   Pan, Y-C; Foley, R J; Filippenko, A V; Kuin, N P (May 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)
3. On Aggregation of Uncensored and Censored Observations

   https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530724700078  

   Efromovich, Sam (June 2024, Mathematical Methods of Statistics)
4. Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations

   Bhattacharyya, Arnab; Gayen, Sutanu; Kandasamy, Saravanan; Maran, Ashwin; Vinodchandran, N. V. (July 2020, International Conference on Machine Learning)

   null (Ed.)
5. Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations

   Bhattacharyya, Arnab; Gayen, Sutanu; Kandasamy, Saravanan; Maran, Ashwin; Vinodchandran, N. V. (July 2020, Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning)

   We study the problem of efficiently estimating the effect of an intervention on a single variable using observational samples. Our goal is to give algorithms with polynomial time and sample complexity in a non-parametric setting. Tian and Pearl (AAAI ’02) have exactly characterized the class of causal graphs for which causal effects of atomic interventions can be identified from observational data. We make their result quantitative. Suppose 𝒫 is a causal model on a set V of n observable variables with respect to a given causal graph G, and let do(x) be an identifiable intervention on a variable X. We show that assuming that G has bounded in-degree and bounded c-components (k) and that the observational distribution satisfies a strong positivity condition: (i) [Evaluation] There is an algorithm that outputs with probability 2/3 an evaluator for a distribution P^ that satisfies TV(P(V | do(x)), P^(V)) < eps using m=O (n/eps^2) samples from P and O(mn) time. The evaluator can return in O(n) time the probability P^(v) for any assignment v to V. (ii) [Sampling] There is an algorithm that outputs with probability 2/3 a sampler for a distribution P^ that satisfies TV(P(V | do(x)), P^(V)) < eps using m=O (n/eps^2) samples from P and O(mn) time. The sampler returns an iid sample from P^ with probability 1 in O(n) time. We extend our techniques to estimate P(Y | do(x)) for a subset Y of variables of interest. We also show lower bounds for the sample complexity, demonstrating that our sample complexity has optimal dependence on the parameters n and eps, as well as if k=1 on the strong positivity parameter. 

   more » « less