skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Post-fire erosion potential of clayey sand soils and slopes – A laboratory study
One of the principal side effects of wildland fire extreme events is mass soil erosion event of the soil and slopes denuded by the fire. These soil erosion events may be devastating and extreme in their own rights, damaging critical infrastructure downslope or downstream of the fire burn scars. While there are many variables influencing the severity of post fire erosion, the amounts of soil erosion are largely dependent on the water content of the soil at the time of the fire coupled with the fire intensity. Fires that are lower intensity or soils that are “wet” at time of burning have significantly less damage to root structures of grasses and other plants while showing lessened soil erosion potential. Fires that are higher intensity or on dry soils have higher damages to root structures and increased soil erosion potential. In this laboratory study, a single clayey sand soil material common to the ground surface across the Black Hills of South Dakota and Wyoming is studied for erosion potential after burning in a controlled container burn. This material is varied by initial water content and burned at a soil surface temperature of 800 Celsius for 75 minutes, a temperature-time continuum consistent with severe wildland fire. Burning is used rather than kilns to preserve the same atmospheric conditions as in the field fire event. A laboratory soil-erosion device is then used to measure soil erosion potential across a range of fluid velocities and soil slopes. The results of this study show that the initial water content of the soil at the time of fire is a key parameter in understanding soil erosion potential post-fire. While not a complete study on time-temperature-water content across many soil types, this pilot research shows promise for future models and mapping tools. These future tools will enable planners to target resources for post wildfire erosion mitigation based on surficial soil water content at the time of the fire.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1929143
PAR ID:
10309963
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Date Published:
Journal Name:
10th International Conference on Soil Erosion and Scour
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Patterns of energy and available moisture can vary over small (<1 km) distances in mountainous terrain. Information on fuel and soil moisture conditions that resolves this variation could help to inform fire and drought management decisions. Here, we describe the development of TOPOFIRE, a web-based mapping system designed to provide finely resolved information on soil water balance, drought, and wildfire danger information for the contiguous United States. We developed 8-arc-second-resolution (~250 meter) daily historical, near real-time, and 4-day forecast radiation, temperature, humidity, and snow water equivalent data and used these grids to calculate a suite of drought and wildfire danger indices. Large differences in shortwave radiation and surface air temperature with aspect contribute to greater snow accumulation and delays in melt timing on north-facing slopes, delaying fuel conditioning on shaded slopes. These datasets will help advance our understanding of the role of topography in wildland fire spread and ecological effects. Integration with national programs like the Wildland Fire Assessment System, the Wildland Fire Decision Support System, and drought early warning systems could support more proactive management of wildland fires and refine the characterization of drought in mountainous regions of the United States. 
    more » « less
  2. In the natural environment, wildfires affect how water interacts with soil leading to potentially catastrophic phenomena such as flooding, debris flows, and decreased water quality. Wildfires can cause soil sealing from increased soil water repellency, which in turn reduces infiltration and increases flood risk during rainfall. A 2017 meta-analysis found two properties that were affected by soil burning processes: Sorptivity (the capacity of a soil to absorb or desorb liquid by capillarity, S) and hydraulic conductivity (the ability for soil to transmit water when saturated, Kfs). Changes in these properties act synergistically to reduce infiltration, which increases erosion by accelerating and amplifying surface runoff. Thus, this research seeks to understand how soils subjected to severe burning compare to unburned soils. Using a mini-disk infiltrometer, field tests measured hydraulic conductivity of soils burned under slash and burn piles during the winters of 2016-17, 2020-21, and 2023-23 to better understand changes that occur in soil-hydraulic properties over time. These slash and burn piles served as approximate impacts for wildfires. Slash and burn piles also allow for paired measurements of unburned soils immediately adjacent to the burned area. Hydraulic conductivity was not significantly different when comparing burned and unburned soils 1 year after being burned. However, there was a significant difference between the hydraulic conductivity of soils burned 3 years ago compared to both unburned soil and soils burned 1 year ago. This suggests an interim process between 1- and 3-years post-burn that reduces hydraulic conductivity of burned soils. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Wildfires may increase soil emissions of trace nitrogen (N) gases like nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O) by changing soil physicochemical conditions and altering microbial processes like nitrification and denitrification. When 34 studies were synthesized, we found a significant increase in both NO and N2O emissions up to 1 year post-fire across studies spanning ecosystems globally. However, when fluxes were separated by ecosystem type, we found that individual ecosystem types responded uniquely to fire. Forest soils tended to emit more N2O after fire, but there was no significant effect on NO. Shrubland soils showed significant increases in both NO and N2O emissions after fires; often with extremely large but short-lived NO pulses occurring immediately after fire. Grassland NO emissions increased after fire, but the size of this effect was small relative to shrublands. N2O emissions from burned grasslands were highly variable with no significant effect. To better understand the variation in responses to fire across global ecosystems, more consistent measurements of variables recognized as important controls on soil fluxes of NO and N2O (e.g., N cycling rates, soil water content, pH, and substrate availability) are needed across studies. We also suggest that fire-specific elements like burn severity, microbial community succession, and the presence of char be considered by future studies. Our synthesis suggests that fires can exacerbate ecosystem N loss long after they burn, increasing soil emissions of NO and N2O with implications for ecosystem N loss, climate, and regional air quality as wildfires increase globally. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Wildfires are a major disturbance to forest carbon (C) balance through both immediate combustion emissions and post-fire ecosystem dynamics. Here we used a process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), to simulate C budget in Alaska and Canada during 1986–2016, as impacted by fire disturbances. We extracted the data of difference Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) for fires from Landsat TM/ETM imagery and estimated the proportion of vegetation and soil C combustion. We observed that the region was a C source of 2.74 Pg C during the 31-year period. The observed C loss, 57.1 Tg C year −1 , was attributed to fire emissions, overwhelming the net ecosystem production (1.9 Tg C year −1 ) in the region. Our simulated direct emissions for Alaska and Canada are within the range of field measurements and other model estimates. As burn severity increased, combustion emission tended to switch from vegetation origin towards soil origin. When dNBR is below 300, fires increase soil temperature and decrease soil moisture and thus, enhance soil respiration. However, the post-fire soil respiration decreases for moderate or high burn severity. The proportion of post-fire soil emission in total emissions increased with burn severity. Net nitrogen mineralization gradually recovered after fire, enhancing net primary production. Net ecosystem production recovered fast under higher burn severities. The impact of fire disturbance on the C balance of northern ecosystems and the associated uncertainties can be better characterized with long-term, prior-, during- and post-disturbance data across the geospatial spectrum. Our findings suggest that the regional source of carbon to the atmosphere will persist if the observed forest wildfire occurrence and severity continues into the future. 
    more » « less
  5. ABSTRACT Rising temperatures and shifting fire regimes in the western United States are pushing fires upslope into areas of deep winter snowpack, where we have little knowledge of the likely hydrologic impacts of wildfire. We quantified differences in the timing and magnitude of stormflow responses to summer rainstorms among six catchments of varying levels of burn severity and seasonal snowpack cover for years 1–3 after the 2020 Cameron Peak fire. Our objectives were to (1) examine whether responsiveness, magnitude, and timing of stormflow responses to rainfall vary between burned and unburned catchments and between snow zones, and (2) identify the factors that affect these responses. We evaluated whether differences in storm hydrograph peak flow, total flow, stage rise, and lag to peak time differed by snow zone and burn category using generalised linear models. Additional predictors in these models are the maximum 60‐min rainfall intensity for each storm, the cumulative potential water deficit prior to the storm, and the year post‐fire. These models showed that the high snow zone (HSZ) has higher total stormflow than the low snow zone (LSZ), likely due to the higher soil moisture content in that area. In both snow zones, the biggest driver of the magnitude of the stormflow response was MI60. Burn category did not have a clear impact on stormflow response in the HSZ, but it did impact stage rise at the severely burned catchment in the LSZ. This was the only site that had widespread overland flow post‐fire. These results demonstrate that the stormflow responses to fire vary between snow zones, indicating a need to account for elevation and snow persistence in post‐fire risk assessments. 
    more » « less