skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Toward an accommodation account of deaccenting under nonidentity
Two competing models attempt to explain the deaccentuation of antecedent nonidentical discourse-inferable material (e.g., Bach wrote many pieces for viola. He must have LOVED string instruments). One uses a single grammatical constraint to license deaccenting for identical and nonidentical material. The second licenses deaccenting grammatically only for identical constituents, whereas deaccented nonidentical material requires accommodation of an alternative antecedent. In three experiments, we tested listeners’ preferences for accentuation or deaccentuation on nonidentical inferable material in out-of-the-blue contexts, supportive discourse contexts, and in the presence of the presupposition trigger too. The results indicate that listeners by default prefer for inferable material to be accented, but that this preference can be mitigated or even reversed with the help of manipulations in the broader discourse context. By contrast, listeners reliably preferred for repeated material to be deaccented. We argue that these results are more compatible with the accommodation model of deaccenting licensing, which allows for differential licensing of deaccentuation on inferable versus repeated constituents and provides a principled account of the sensitivity of accentuation preferences on inferable material to broader contextual manipulations.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1827404
PAR ID:
10310493
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Editor(s):
Beltrama, Andrea; Schwarz, Florian; Papagragou, Anna
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Experiments in Linguistic Meaning
Volume:
1
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. A central question of language comprehension concerns the interaction between linguistic form and broader representations of discourse in the interpretation of context-sensitive expressions. This interaction is instantiated in the interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis, where previous work has shown that the linguistic antecedent and the broader context are both considered in resolution. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we investigated VPE interpretation in discourses where the antecedent and the broader context make different information available for inclusion in the interpretation of the ellipsis site. Our results point to a complex interaction between linguistic antecedents and the broader discourse context in interpretation, putting considerable constraints on the set of possible models for VPE resolution. This work contributes to a better understanding of both the connections between and the boundaries separating linguistic structure and mental models of discourse contexts. 
    more » « less
  2. Skarnitzl, R. & (Ed.)
    The timing of both manual co-speech gestures and head gestures is sensitive to prosodic structure of speech. However, head gesters are used not only by speakers, but also by listeners as a backchanneling device. Little research exists on the timing of gestures in back-channeling. To address this gap, we compare timing of listener and speaker head gestures in an interview context. Results reveal the dual role that head gestures play in speech and conversational interaction: while they are coordinated in key ways to one’s own speech, they are also coordinated to the gestures (and hence, the speech) of a conversation partner when one is actively listening to them. We also show that head gesture timing is sensitive to social dynamics between interlocutors. This study provides a novel contribution to literature on head gesture timing and has implications for studies of discourse and accommodation. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    The pronoun “they” can be either plural or singular, perhaps referring to an individual who identifies as nonbinary. How do listeners identifywhether “they” has a singular or plural sense? We test the role of explicitly discussing pronouns (e.g., “Alex uses they/them pronouns”). In three experiments, participants read short stories, like “Alex went running with Liz. They fell down.” Answers to “Who fell down” indicated whether participants interpreted they as Alex or Alex-and-Liz. We found more singular responses in discourse contexts that make Alex more available: when Alex was either the only person in the context or mentioned first. Critically, the singular interpretation was stronger when participants heard explicit instructions that Alex uses they/them pronouns, even though participants in all conditions had ample opportunity to learn this fact through observation. Results show that the social trend to talk about pronouns has a direct impact on how language is understood. 
    more » « less
  4. The claim that deaccenting of a constituent can be licensed by an entailment or bridging relation in addition to overt instantiation in the prior discourse context has generally not been the subject of rigorous empirical investigation. In a production study, participants read verbs that were new to the discourse, overtly instantiated in an antecedent, or made available via entailment or a bridging inference. Analysis of f0, intensity, duration, and naive judgments of prominence largely failed to detect evidence that verbs made available by inferencing relations were pronounced with less prominence than those that were new to the discourse, whereas verbs that were overtly instantiated in the prior discourse were reliably deaccented. The results call into question the claim that deaccenting can be licensed by inferencing relations and motivate further study of deaccenting under non-identity. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    The present study compares how individuals perceive gradient acoustic realizations of emotion produced by a human voice versus an Amazon Alexa text-to-speech (TTS) voice. We manipulated semantically neutral sentences spoken by both talkers with identical emotional synthesis methods, using three levels of increasing ‘happiness’ (0 %, 33 %, 66% ‘happier’). On each trial, listeners (native speakers of American English, n=99) rated a given sentence on two scales to assess dimensions of emotion: valence (negative-positive) and arousal (calm-excited). Participants also rated the Alexa voice on several parameters to assess anthropomorphism (e.g., naturalness, human-likeness, etc.). Results showed that the emotion manipulations led to increases in perceived positive valence and excitement. Yet, the effect differed by interlocutor: increasing ‘happiness’ manipulations led to larger changes for the human voice than the Alexa voice. Additionally, we observed individual differences in perceived valence/arousal based on participants’ anthropomorphism scores. Overall, this line of research can speak to theories of computer personification and elucidate our changng relationship with voice-AI technology. 
    more » « less