Deepfakes have become a dual-use technology with applications in the domains of art, science, and industry. However, the technology can also be leveraged maliciously in areas such as disinformation, identity fraud, and harassment. In response to the technology's dangerous potential many deepfake creation communities have been deplatformed, including the technology's originating community – r/deepfakes. Opening in February 2018, just eight days after the removal of r/deepfakes, MrDeepFakes (MDF) went online as a privately owned platform to fulfill the role of community hub, and has since grown into the largest dedicated deepfake creation and discussion platform currently online. This position of community hub is balanced against the site's other main purpose, which is the hosting of deepfake pornography depicting public figures- produced without consent. In this paper we explore the two largest deepfake communities that have existed via a mixed methods approach utilizing quantitative and qualitative analysis. We seek to identify how these platforms were and are used by their members, what opinions these deepfakers hold about the technology and how it is seen by society at large, and identify how deepfakes-as-disinformation is viewed by the community. We find that there is a large emphasis on technical discussion on these platforms, intermixed with potentially malicious content. Additionally, we find the deplatforming of deepfake communities early in the technology's life has significantly impacted trust regarding alternative community platforms.
more »
« less
The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Survey
Generative deep learning algorithms have progressed to a point where it is difficult to tell the difference between what is real and what is fake. In 2018, it was discovered how easy it is to use this technology for unethical and malicious applications, such as the spread of misinformation, impersonation of political leaders, and the defamation of innocent individuals. Since then, these “deepfakes” have advanced significantly. In this article, we explore the creation and detection of deepfakes and provide an in-depth view as to how these architectures work. The purpose of this survey is to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of (1) how deepfakes are created and detected, (2) the current trends and advancements in this domain, (3) the shortcomings of the current defense solutions, and (4) the areas that require further research and attention.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1704701
- PAR ID:
- 10313487
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Volume:
- 54
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0360-0300
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
A deepfake is content or material that is synthetically generated or manipulated using artificial intelligence (AI) methods, to be passed off as real and can include audio, video, image, and text synthesis. The key difference between manual editing and deepfakes is that deepfakes are AI generated or AI manipulated and closely resemble authentic artifacts. In some cases, deepfakes can be fabricated using AI-generated content in its entirety. Deepfakes have started to have a major impact on society with more generation mechanisms emerging everyday. This article makes a contribution in understanding the landscape of deepfakes, and their detection and generation methods. We evaluate various categories of deepfakes especially in audio. The purpose of this survey is to provide readers with a deeper understanding of (1) different deepfake categories; (2) how they could be created and detected; (3) more specifically, how audio deepfakes are created and detected in more detail, which is the main focus of this paper. We found that generative adversarial networks (GANs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and deep neural networks (DNNs) are common ways of creating and detecting deepfakes. In our evaluation of over 150 methods, we found that the majority of the focus is on video deepfakes, and, in particular, the generation of video deepfakes. We found that for text deepfakes, there are more generation methods but very few robust methods for detection, including fake news detection, which has become a controversial area of research because of the potential heavy overlaps with human generation of fake content. Our study reveals a clear need to research audio deepfakes and particularly detection of audio deepfakes. This survey has been conducted with a different perspective, compared to existing survey papers that mostly focus on just video and image deepfakes. This survey mainly focuses on audio deepfakes that are overlooked in most of the existing surveys. This article's most important contribution is to critically analyze and provide a unique source of audio deepfake research, mostly ranging from 2016 to 2021. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey focusing on audio deepfakes generation and detection in English.more » « less
-
more » « less
The increasing reach of deepfakes raises practical questions about people’s ability to detect false videos online. How vulnerable are people to deepfake videos? What technologies can help improve detection? Previous experiments that measure human deepfake detection historically omit a number of conditions that can exist in typical browsing conditions. Here, we operationalized four such conditions (low prevalence, brief presentation, low video quality, and divided attention), and found in a series of online experiments that all conditions lowered detection relative to baseline, suggesting that the current literature underestimates people’s susceptibility to deepfakes. Next, we examined how AI assistance could be integrated into the human decision process. We found that a model that exposes deepfakes by amplifying artifacts increases detection rates, and also leads to higher rates of incorporating AI feedback and higher final confidence than text-based prompts. Overall, this suggests that visual indicators that cause distortions on fake videos may be effective at mitigating the impact of falsified video.
-
more » « less
Abstract Deepfakes, particularly audio deepfakes, have become pervasive and pose unique, ever‐changing threats to society. This paper reviews the current research landscape on audio deepfakes. We assert that limitations of existing approaches to deepfake detection and discernment are areas where (socio)linguists can directly contribute to helping address the societal challenge of audio deepfakes. In particular, incorporating expert knowledge and developing techniques that everyday listeners can use to avoid deception are promising pathways for (socio)linguistics. Further opportunities exist for developing benevolent applications of this technology through generative AI methods as well.
-
Easy access to audio-visual content on social media, combined with the availability of modern tools such as Tensorflow or Keras, and open-source trained models, along with economical computing infrastructure, and the rapid evolution of deep-learning (DL) methods have heralded a new and frightening trend. Particularly, the advent of easily available and ready to use Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), have made it possible to generate deepfakes media partially or completely fabricated with the intent to deceive to disseminate disinformation and revenge porn, to perpetrate financial frauds and other hoaxes, and to disrupt government functioning. Existing surveys have mainly focused on the detection of deepfake images and videos; this paper provides a comprehensive review and detailed analysis of existing tools and machine learning (ML) based approaches for deepfake generation, and the methodologies used to detect such manipulations in both audio and video. For each category of deepfake, we discuss information related to manipulation approaches, current public datasets, and key standards for the evaluation of the performance of deepfake detection techniques, along with their results. Additionally, we also discuss open challenges and enumerate future directions to guide researchers on issues which need to be considered in order to improve the domains of both deepfake generation and detection. This work is expected to assist readers in understanding how deepfakes are created and detected, along with their current limitations and where future research may lead.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3425780
