More Like this

1. Stress fiber strain recognition by the LIM protein testin is cryptic and mediated by RhoA

   https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e21-03-0156  

   Sala, Stefano; Oakes, Patrick W. (August 2021, Molecular Biology of the Cell)

   Dunn, Alex (Ed.)

   The actin cytoskeleton is a key regulator of mechanical processes in cells. The family of LIM domain proteins have recently emerged as important mechanoresponsive cytoskeletal elements capable of sensing strain in the actin cytoskeleton. The mechanisms regulating this mechanosensitive behavior, however, remain poorly understood. Here we show that the LIM domain protein testin is peculiar in that despite the full-length protein primarily appearing diffuse in the cytoplasm, the C-terminal LIM domains alone recognize focal adhesions and strained actin, while the N-terminal domains alone recognize stress fibers. Phosphorylation mutations in the dimerization regions of testin, however, reveal its mechanosensitivity and cause it to relocate to focal adhesions and sites of strain in the actin cytoskeleton. Finally, we demonstrate that activated RhoA causes testin to adorn stress fibers and become mechanosensitive. Together, our data show that testin’s mechanoresponse is regulated in cells and provide new insights into LIM domain protein recognition of the actin cytoskeleton’s mechanical state. 

   more » « less
2. Plectin affects cell viscoelasticity at small and large deformations

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.001  

   Conboy, James P; Lettinga, Mathilde G; van_Vliet, Nicole; Winter, Lilli; Wiche, Gerhard; MacKintosh, Fred C; Koenderink, Gijsje H (January 2026, Biophysical Journal)

   Plectin is a giant protein of the plakin family that cross-links the cytoskeleton of mammalian cells. It is expressed in virtually all tissues, and its dysfunction is associated with various diseases such as skin blistering. There is evidence that plectin regulates the mechanical integrity of the cytoskeleton in diverse cell and tissue types. However, it is unknown how plectin modulates the mechanical response of cells depending on the frequency and amplitude of mechanical loading. Here we demonstrate the role of plectin in the viscoelastic properties of fibroblasts at small and large deformations by quantitative single-cell compression measurements. To identify the importance of plectin, we compared the mechanical properties of wild-type (Plec +=+) fibroblasts and plectin knockout (Plec-=-) fibroblasts. We show that plectin knockout cells are nearly twofold softer than wild-type cells, but their strain-stiffening behavior is similar. Plectin deficiency also caused faster viscoelastic stress relaxation at long times. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments indicated that this was due to threefold faster actin turnover. Short-time poroelastic relaxation was also faster in Plec-=- cells compared with Plec +=+ cells, suggesting a more sparse cytoskeletal network. Confocal imaging indicated that this was due to a marked change in the architecture of the vimentin network, from a fine meshwork in wild-type cells to a bundled network in the plectin knockout cells. Our findings therefore indicate that plectin is an important regulator of the organization and viscoelastic properties of the cytoskeleton in fibroblasts. Our findings emphasize that mechanical integration of the different cytoskeletal networks present in cells is important for regulating the versatile mechanical properties of cells. SIGNIFICANCE Mammalian cells combine superior mechanical strength with the ability to actively deform themselves. They owe this paradoxical mechanical behavior to their cytoskeleton, an intracellular web of protein filaments that includes actin filaments and intermediate filaments. It is known that both cytoskeletal filament types contribute to cell stiffness on their own, but the impact of their mechanical integration via cytoskeletal cross-linker proteins remains unknown. Here, we test the effect of cross-linking of actin and vimentin intermediate filaments by the cross-linker protein plectin in fibroblasts by single-cell compression measurements. By comparing normal cells and cells in which plectin is knocked out, we find that plectin significantly increases cell stiffness and provides a protective mechanism against actin network disruption by compressive loading. 

   more » « less
3. Epithelial cells sense local stiffness via Piezo1 mediated cytoskeletal reorganization

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1198109  

   Jetta, Deekshitha; Shireen, Tasnim; Hua, Susan Z. (May 2023, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology)

   Local substrate stiffness is one of the major mechanical inputs for tissue organization during its development and remodeling. It is widely recognized that adherent cells use transmembrane proteins (integrins) at focal adhesions to translate ECM mechanical cues into intracellular bioprocess. Here we show that epithelial cells respond to substrate stiffening primarily via actin cytoskeleton organization, that requires activation of mechanosensitive Piezo1 channels. Piezo1 Knockdown cells eliminated the actin stress fibers that formed on stiff substrates, while it had minimal effect on cell morphology and spreading area. Inhibition of Piezo1 channels with GsMTx4 also significantly reduced stiffness-induced F-actin reorganization, suggesting Piezo1 mediated cation current plays a role. Activation of Piezo1 channels with specific agonist (Yoda1) resulted in thickening of F-actin fibers and enlargement of FAs on stiffer substrates, whereas it did not affect the formation of nascent FAs that facilitate spreading on the soft substrates. These results demonstrate that Piezo1 functions as a force sensor that couples with actin cytoskeleton to distinguish the substrate stiffness and facilitate epithelial adaptive remodeling. 

   more » « less
4. Impact of N-terminal dimerization on formin homology 1 domain polymer dynamics and actin assembly

   https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.21.689827  

   Bogue, Katharine; Christian, Bryan; Quinlan, Margot; Allard, Jun (November 2025, bioRxiv)

   Abstract Many proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that lack stable 3-dimensional structure. IDR behavior is poorly understood, leading to challenges for biochemical and computational analysis of IDR-containing proteins. Formins are a diverse set of homodimers containing an IDR — the FH1 domain — that facilitates polymerization of the cytoskeletal protein actin by increasing the local concentration of actin monomers at the actin assembly site. A commonly accepted model of formin-based actin polymerization involves a capture-and-deliver process: one or more binding sites (proline-rich motifs, PRMs) “capture” actin monomers and then “deliver” actin to the actin assembly site. There is evidence that formin FH1 domains are dimerized on both ends, but much research has been performed with formin constructs lacking the N-terminal dimerization site. Here, we ask: What happens when N-terminal dimerization is added to the standard model of formin-mediated actin assembly? We extend the kinetic model of FH1-mediated actin polymerization by incorporating a coarse-grain polymer model of FH1 domain dynamics, modeling the FH1 domain as a freely-jointed chain. We find that N-terminal dimerization can impact polymerization rates by modifying binding site accessibility and/or local concentration of binding sites (PRMs) at the actin assembly site (FH2 domain). Which effect dominates depends on kinetic parameters and formin properties such as FH1 domain length and binding site location. Additionally, we demonstrate that our model can be fit to experimental data and used to make predictions for the effects of N-terminal dimerization on a variety of formin family members. SignificanceIntrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are common protein components that lack stable 3D structures and are thus difficult to study. Here, we develop a polymer-physics based computational model of the formin FH1 domain, an IDR involved in building the cell’s cytoskeleton. Some disease-associated mutations of formins occur in a region that is suspected to induce dimerization, forcing the FH1 domains to form a loop. Little is known about the loop’s prevalence, location, or impact on cytoskeletal assembly. Using simple polymer physics, we demonstrate that this dimerization can alter FH1 domain polymer dynamics and thus impact cytoskeletal assembly. These results not only highlight an important aspect of FH1-mediated cytoskeletal assembly, but also provide a framework for modeling IDRs. 

   more » « less
5. Integrated structural model of the palladin–actin complex using XL ‐ MS , docking, NMR , and SAXS

   https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70122  

   Sargent, Rachel; Liu, David H; Yadav, Rahul; Glennenmeier, Drew; Bradford, Colby; Urbina, Noely; Beck, Moriah R (May 2025, Protein Science)

   Cortajarena, Aitziber L (Ed.)

   Abstract Palladin is an actin‐binding protein that accelerates actin polymerization and is linked to the metastasis of several types of cancer. Previously, three lysine residues in an immunoglobulin‐like domain of palladin have been identified as essential for actin binding. However, it is still unknown where palladin binds to F‐actin. Evidence that palladin binds to the sides of actin filaments to facilitate branching is supported by our previous study showing that palladin was able to compensate for Arp2/3 in the formation ofListeriaactin comet tails. Here, we used chemical crosslinking to covalently link palladin and F‐actin residues based on spatial proximity. Samples were then enzymatically digested, separated by liquid chromatography, and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Peptides containing the crosslinks and specific residues involved were then identified for input to the HADDOCK docking server to model the most likely binding conformation. Small‐angle x‐ray scattering was used to provide further insight into palladin flexibility and the binding interface, and NMR spectra identified potential interactions between palladin's Ig domains. Our final structural model of the F‐actin:palladin complex revealed how palladin interacts with and stabilizes F‐actin at the interface between two actin monomers. Three actin residues that were identified in this study also appear commonly in the actin‐binding interface with other proteins such as myotilin, myosin, and tropomodulin. An accurate structural representation of the complex between palladin and actin extends our understanding of palladin's role in promoting cancer metastasis through the regulation of actin dynamics. 

   more » « less