University-based makerspaces are receiving increasing attention as promising innovations that may contribute to the development of future engineers. Using a theory of social boundary spaces, we investigated whether the diverse experiences offered at university-based makerspaces may contribute to students’ learning and development of various “soft” or “21st century” skills that go beyond engineering-specific content knowledge. Through interviews with undergraduate student users at two university-based makerspaces in the United States we identified seven different types of boundary spaces (where multiple communities, and the individuals and activities affiliated with those communities, come together). We identified students engaging in the processes of identification,more »
Student development at the boundaries: Makerspaces as affordances for engineering students’ development.
University-based makerspaces are receiving increasing attention as promising innovations
that may contribute to the development of future engineers. Using a theory of social boundary
spaces, we investigated whether the diverse experiences offered at university-based makerspaces
may contribute to students’ learning and development of various “soft” or “21st century” skills that
go beyond engineering-specific content knowledge. Through interviews with undergraduate student
users at two university-based makerspaces in the United States we identified seven different types
of boundary spaces (where multiple communities, and the individuals and activities affiliated with
those communities, come together). We identified students engaging in the processes of identification,
reflection, and coordination, which allowed them to make sense of, and navigate, the various boundary
spaces they encountered in the makerspaces. These processes provided students with opportunities
to engage with, and learn from, individuals and practices affiliated with various communities and
disciplines. These opportunities can lead to students’ development of necessary skills to creatively
and collaboratively address interdisciplinary socio-scientific problems. We suggest that universitybased
makerspaces can offer important developmental experiences for a diverse body of students
that may be challenging for a single university department, program, or course to offer. Based on
these findings, we recommend university programs and faculty intentionally integrate makerspace
activities into undergraduate curricula to support students’ development of skills, knowledge, and
practices relevant more »
- Award ID(s):
- 1902829
- Publication Date:
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10319672
- Journal Name:
- Sustainability
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2162-5689
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Thought must be given to how individuals from underrepresented groups (URGs) conceptualize their academic engineering identities. Black male students have been shown to face a great challenge in integrating their racial identification into their self-concept. This “balancing act” involves the navigation and negotiation between multiple social spaces. The establishment of a positive identity associated with engineering is critical to how underrepresented students establish their sense of agency and overall “fit” within the institutional and/or professional setting. Yet, because of low numbers in participant populations, many studies fail to disaggregate the experiences of individuals from URGs. Further, if makerspaces represent anmore »
-
null (Ed.)In the last decade, postsecondary institutions have seen a notable increase in makerspaces on their campuses and the integration of these spaces into engineering programs. Yet research into the efficacy of university-based makerspaces is sparse. We contribute to this nascent body of research in reporting on findings from a phenomenological study on the perceptions of faculty, staff, and students concerning six university-based makerspaces in the United States. We discuss the findings using a framework of heterogeneous engineering (integration of the social and technical aspects of engineering practice). Various physical, climate, and programmatic features of makerspaces were read as affordances formore »
-
The role of modern engineers as problem-definer often require collaborating with cross-disciplinary teams of professionals to understand and effectively integrate the role of other disciplines and accelerate innovation. To prepare future engineers for this emerging role, undergraduate engineering students should engage in collaborative and interdisciplinary activities with faculties and students from various disciplines (e.g., engineering and social science). Such cross-disciplinary experiences of undergraduate engineering students are not common in today’s university curriculum. Through a project funded by the division of Engineering Education and Centers (EEC) of the National Science Foundation (NSF), a research team of the West Virginia University developedmore »
-
Beyond Making: Application of Constructionist Learning Principles in Engineering Prototyping CentersThe creation of student-centered spaces for making and prototyping continues to be a growing trend in higher education. These spaces are especially relevant in engineering education as they provide opportunities for engineering students to engage in authentic and collaborative problemsolving activities that can develop students’ 21st-century skills [1–3]. Principles of constructionist learning theory, which promote knowledge creation through development of a physical product [4,5], may be applied to support learning within these spaces. Beyond the construction of objects, this learning theory emphasizes a learning culture where teachers serve as guides to collaborative and student-driven learning [6]. This research seeks tomore »