Arnold, J. E., Mayo, H., & Dong, L. (2020). Individual differences (or the lack of them) in comprehension of singular they. Technical Report #3. UNC Language Processing Lab, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
The pronoun “they” can refer to an individual who identifies as nonbinary, but it also is commonly used as a plural pronoun. How do listeners identify whether “they” is being used in a singular or plural sense? Arnold, Mayo, & Dong (in press) report three experiments in that test the role of explicitly introducing gender identity via pronouns, e.g. “This is Alex, and they use they/them pronouns.” Participants read short stories like “Alex went running with Liz and they fell down.” Answers to “Who fell down” indicated whether participants interpreted they as Alex or Alex-and-Liz. Singular interpretations of they were more likely when participants hear an explicit statement that Alex uses they/them pronouns, and in supporting discourse contexts. This paper is a companion to the main article, and reports analyses of individual difference measures. Participants self-reported familiarity with individuals who identify as nonbinary, which was expected to increase singular interpretations, but mostly it did not. In experiment 2 we also measured print exposure, but we found that it did not affect interpretation of singular they. In short, we saw virtually no effects of individual difference predictors.
more »
« less
Does SES affect pronoun comprehension and prediction in implicit causality scenarios?
Johnson, E. & Arnold, J. E. (2021). Does SES affect pronoun comprehension and prediction in implicit causality scenarios? Technical Report #4. UNC Language Processing Lab, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
This paper examines whether individuals’ pronoun resolution varies with respect to their socioeconomic status (SES). It uses the data from the Johnson and Arnold (2021) paper to determine whether the author recognition task (ART) effect that was found could instead be explained by participants’ SES. Both socioeconomic status and the author recognition task have been shown to correlate with measures of reading skill, so as a secondary analysis, SES was included as a possible predictor of individual differences.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1651000
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10323215
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- UNC Processing Lab Technical Report #4
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Arnold, J. E., & Zerkle, S. A. (2021). Additional Methods and Analyses for “Who gets mentioned next? The answer depends on the experimental task.” Technical Report #5. UNC Language Processing Lab, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.more » « less
-
This file contains grain-size data from seabed shipek grab samples collected from R/V Ukpik in summer 2021 as part of NSF project 1913195 (Arctic Shelf sediment fate – an observational and modeling study of sediment pathways and morphodynamic feedbacks in a changing polar environment). Samples were collected from across Harrison Bay on the Alaskan Beaufort Shelf, north of the Colville River and between Oliktok Point and Cape Halkett. Samples were bagged in the field and returned to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where grain-size analyses were performed using an Escitec Bettersizer S3Plus laser diffraction sensor. Samples were sonicated for two minutes prior to analyses. Samples ranged from well sorted sands (typically medium sand or fine) to poorly sorted bimodal sands and muds to unimodal muds. In the field, samples exhibited diverse textures including mud clasts and very stiff muds.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Smart city projects aim to enhance the management of city infrastructure by enabling government entities to monitor, control and maintain infrastructure efficiently through the deployment of Internet-of-things (IoT) devices. However, the financial burden associated with smart city projects is a detriment to prospective smart cities. A noteworthy factor that impacts the cost and sustainability of smart city projects is providing cellular Internet connectivity to IoT devices. In response to this problem, this paper explores the use of public transportation network nodes and mules, such as bus-stops as buses, to facilitate connectivity via device-to-device communication in order to reduce cellular connectivity costs within a smart city. The data mules convey non-urgent data from IoT devices to edge computing hardware, where data can be processed or sent to the cloud. Consequently, this paper focuses on edge node placement in smart cities that opportunistically leverage public transit networks for reducing reliance on and thus costs of cellular connectivity. We introduce an algorithm that selects a set of edge nodes that provides maximal sensor coverage and explore another that selects a set of edge nodes that provide minimal delivery delay within a budget. The algorithms are evaluated for two public transit network data-sets: Chapel Hill, North Carolina and Louisville, Kentucky. Results show that our algorithms consistently outperform edge node placement strategies that rely on traditional centrality metrics (betweenness and in-degree centrality) by over 77% reduction in coverage budget and over 20 minutes reduction in latency.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Smart city projects have the potential to improve the management of environmental and public infrastructure. However, the operational and capital expenditures of smart cities can prevent cities from becoming smarter. A notable factor that influences the cost is providing cellular Internet connectivity to IoT devices. 5G has been proposed as a possible solution, but projections show that 5G will not be able to support the load of billions of IoT devices coming online. To mitigate this, people, vehicles, and other nodes in transportation networks can be exploited to transmit non-urgent data by leveraging device-to-device communication in order to reduce cellular connectivity costs associated with smart city sensors. Hence, this paper addresses cost-effective edge node placement in smart cities that opportunistically leverage public transit networks. We introduce an algorithm that selects a set of edge nodes that provide minimal delivery delay within a budget. The algorithm is evaluated for two public transit network data-sets: Chapel Hill, North Carolina and Louisville, Kentucky and results show that our algorithm outperforms betweeness and in-degree centrality metrics with a reduction in latency of over 20 minutes.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
