skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 5:00 PM ET until 11:00 PM ET on Friday, June 21 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Identifying factors that nurses consider in the decision-making process related to patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Background Nurse identification of patient deterioration is critical, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, as patients can deteriorate quickly. While the literature has shown that nurses rely on intuition to make decisions, there is limited information on what sources of data experienced nurses utilize to inform their intuition. The objectives of this study were to identify sources of data that inform nurse decision-making related to recognition of deteriorating patients, and explore how COVID-19 has impacted nurse decision-making. Methods In this qualitative study, experienced nurses voluntarily participated in focused interviews. During focused interviews, expert nurses were asked to share descriptions of memorable patient encounters, and questions were posed to facilitate reflections on thoughts and actions that hindered or helped their decision-making. They were also asked to consider the impact of COVID-19 on nursing and decision-making. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, study team members reviewed transcripts and coded responses, and organized key findings into themes. Results Several themes related to decision-making were identified by the research team, including: identifying patient care needs, workload management, and reflecting on missed care opportunities to inform learning. Participants (n = 10) also indicated that COVID-19 presented a number of unique barriers to nurse decision-making. Conclusions Findings from this study indicate that experienced nurses utilize several sources of information to inform their intuition. It is apparent that the demands on nurses in response to pandemics are heightened. Decision-making themes drawn from participants’ experiences can to assist nurse educators for training nursing students on decision-making for deteriorating patients and how to manage the potential barriers (e.g., resource constraints, lack of family) associated with caring for patients during these challenging times prior to encountering these issues in the clinical environment. Nurse practice can utilize these findings to increase awareness among experienced nurses on recognizing how pandemic situations can impact to their decision-making capability.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1928661
NSF-PAR ID:
10323510
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
Fernández-Alcántara, Manuel
Date Published:
Journal Name:
PLOS ONE
Volume:
16
Issue:
7
ISSN:
1932-6203
Page Range / eLocation ID:
e0254077
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Clinically, nurses must rapidly identify deteriorating patients and escalate patient care to adverse events. Novices, however, can easily succumb to cognitive overload. Augmented-reality (AR) devices, such as the Microsoft HoloLens 2, may help nurses attend to task-relevant information more effectively. The aim of this pilot study was to assess experienced nurses’ perceptions on the usability of AR. Practicing nurses were recruited for this study. Following a brief tutorial, demonstration and hands-on use of the HoloLens, nurses completed the system-usability scale (SUS) to rate usability. Additionally, interviews were conducted after the simulated use session. Experienced nurses (n=11) rated the usability of AR as 62.5±7.8. Themes that emerged from our open-ended interviews included the need for AR in nursing education and the potential benefit of a patient care checklist. Use of AR to support nurse decision making may reduce cognitive workload and focus attention on critical areas to recognize patient deterioration. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Background According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, nurses will be the largest labor pool in the United States by 2022, and more than 1.1 million nursing positions have to be filled by then in order to avoid a nursing shortage. In addition, the incidence rate of musculoskeletal disorders in nurses is above average in comparison with other occupations. Robot-assisted health care has the potential to alleviate the nursing shortage by automating mundane and routine nursing tasks. Furthermore, robots in health care environments may assist with safe patient mobility and handling and may thereby reduce the likelihood of musculoskeletal disorders. Objective This pilot study investigates the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness (acceptability) of a customized service robot as determined by nursing students (as proxies for nursing staff in health care environments). This service robot, referred to as the Adaptive Robotic Nurse Assistant (ARNA), was developed to enhance the productivity of nurses through cooperation during physical tasks (eg, patient walking, item fetching, object delivery) as well as nonphysical tasks (eg, patient observation and feedback). This pilot study evaluated the acceptability of ARNA to provide ambulatory assistance to patients. Methods We conducted a trial with 24 participants to collect data and address the following research question: Is the use of ARNA as an ambulatory assistive device for patients acceptable to nurses? The experiments were conducted in a simulated hospital environment. Nursing students (as proxies for nursing staff) were grouped in dyads, with one participant serving as a nurse and the other acting as a patient. Two questionnaires were developed and administrated to the participants based on the Technology Acceptance Model with respect to the two subscales of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use metrics. In order to evaluate the internal consistency/reliability of the questionnaires, we calculated Cronbach alpha coefficients. Furthermore, statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the relation of each variable in the questionnaires with the overall perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use metrics. Results Both Cronbach alpha values were acceptably high (.93 and .82 for perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use questionnaires, respectively), indicating high internal consistency of the questionnaires. The correlation between the variables and the overall perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use metrics was moderate. The average perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use metrics among the participants were 4.13 and 5.42, respectively, out of possible score of 7, indicating a higher-than-average acceptability of this service robot. Conclusions The results served to identify factors that could affect nurses’ acceptance of ARNA and aspects needing improvement (eg, flexibility, ease of operation, and autonomy level). 
    more » « less
  3. This work in progress paper describes preliminary findings from interviews intending to develop a definition of and method for measuring “engineering intuition.” Engineers are asked regularly in their profession to judge situations and predict or estimate results in order to minimize the potential for error. The need for this ability has been amplified with the pervasiveness of computer-aided problem solving in engineering. It is now mandatory for practicing engineers to quickly and accurately evaluate software results as part of the problem-solving process. We hypothesize that the ability to undertake such actions is heavily influenced by discipline-specific intuition, which has been previously explored in the disciplines of nursing and business management. The following study presents preliminary results attempting to define the construct of “engineering intuition.” Semi-structured interviews with practicing nurses, business managers, and engineers were conducted using: 1) implicit discussion around intuition informed by literature, and 2) critical incident technique, i.e., explicit discussion around the concept of intuition. Each interview sought to identify practitioner decision-making and problem-solving processes on the job. The combined dataset and supporting literature are planned to be used as the basis of our future work, which ultimately aims to develop a psychometrically tested instrument capable of accurately measuring engineering intuition. Dissemination of these preliminary results are intended to elicit feedback on our methodologies and findings before moving to the second phase of our research study. 
    more » « less
  4. Telehealth technologies play a vital role in delivering quality healthcare to patients regardless of geographic location and health status. Use of telehealth peripherals allow providers a more accurate method of collecting health assessment data from the patient and delivering a more confident and accurate diagnosis, saving not only time and money but creating positive patient outcomes. Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) students should be confident in their ability to diagnose and treat patients through a virtual environment. This pilot simulation was completed to help examine how APN students interacted in a simulation-based education (SBE) experience with and without peripherals, funded by the National Science Foundation’s Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier (FW-HTF) program. The SBE experience was created and deployed using the INACSL Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticesTM and vetted by a simulation expert. APN students (N = 24), in their first assessment course, were randomly selected to be either a patient (n = 12) or provider (n = 12) in a telehealth simulation. Student dyads (patient/provider) were randomly placed to complete a scenario with (n = 6 dyads) or without (n = 6 dyads) the use of a peripheral. Students (providers and patients) who completed the SBE experience had an increased confidence level both with and without the use of peripherals. Students evaluated the simulation via the Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified (SET-M), and scored their perception of the simulation on a 1 to 5 point Likert Scale. The highest scoring areas were perceived support of learning by the faculty (M=4.6), feeling challenged in decision-making skills (M=4.4), and a better understanding of didactic material (M=4.3). The lowest scoring area was feeling more confident in decision making (M=3.9). We also recorded students’ facial expressions during the task to determine a probability score (0- 100) for expressed basic emotions, and results revealed that students had the highest scores for joy (M = 8.47) and surprise (M = 4.34), followed by disgust (M = 1.43), fear (M = .76), and contempt (M = .64); and had the lowest scores of anger (M = .44) and sadness (M = .36). Students were also asked to complete a reflection assignment as part of the SBE experience. Students reported feeling nervous at the beginning of the SBE experience, but acknowledged feeling better as the SBE experience unfolded. Based on findings from this pilot study, implications point towards the effectiveness of including simulations for nurse practitioner students to increase their confidence in performing telehealth visits and engaging in decision making. For the students, understanding that patients may be just as nervous during telehealth visits was one of the main takeaways from the experience, as well as remembering to reassure the patient and how to ask the patient to work the telehealth equipment. Therefore, providing students opportunities to practice these skills will help increase their confidence, boost their self- and emotion regulation, and improve their decision-making skills in telehealth scenarios. 
    more » « less
  5. Background Mobile health (mHealth) wearable devices are increasingly being adopted by individuals to help manage and monitor physiological signals. However, the current state of wearables does not consider the needs of racially minoritized low–socioeconomic status (SES) communities regarding usability, accessibility, and price. This is a critical issue that necessitates immediate attention and resolution. Objective This study’s aims were 3-fold, to (1) understand how members of minoritized low-SES communities perceive current mHealth wearable devices, (2) identify the barriers and facilitators toward adoption, and (3) articulate design requirements for future wearable devices to enable equitable access for these communities. Methods We performed semistructured interviews with low-SES Hispanic or Latine adults (N=19) from 2 metropolitan cities in the Midwest and West Coast of the United States. Participants were asked questions about how they perceive wearables, what are the current benefits and barriers toward use, and what features they would like to see in future wearable devices. Common themes were identified and analyzed through an exploratory qualitative approach. Results Through qualitative analysis, we identified 4 main themes. Participants’ perceptions of wearable devices were strongly influenced by their COVID-19 experiences. Hence, the first theme was related to the impact of COVID-19 on the community, and how this resulted in a significant increase in interest in wearables. The second theme highlights the challenges faced in obtaining adequate health resources and how this further motivated participants’ interest in health wearables. The third theme focuses on a general distrust in health care infrastructure and systems and how these challenges are motivating a need for wearables. Lastly, participants emphasized the pressing need for community-driven design of wearable technologies. Conclusions The findings from this study reveal that participants from underserved communities are showing emerging interest in using health wearables due to the COVID-19 pandemic and health care access issues. Yet, the needs of these individuals have been excluded from the design and development of current devices. 
    more » « less