Motivation: This is a complete paper. There was a sudden shift from traditional learning to online learning in Spring 2020 with the outbreak of COVID-19. Although online learning is not a new topic of discussion, universities, faculty, and students were not prepared for this sudden change in learning. According to a recent article in ‘The Chronicle of Higher Education, “even under the best of circumstances, virtual learning requires a different, carefully crafted approach to engagement”. The Design Thinking course under study is a required freshmen level course offered in a Mid-western University. The Design Thinking course is offered in a flipped format where all the content to be learned is given to students beforehand and the in-class session is used for active discussions and hands-on learning related to the content provided at the small group level. The final learning objective of the course is a group project where student groups are expected to come up with functional prototypes to solve a real-world problem following the Design Thinking process. There were eighteen sections of the Design Thinking course offered in Spring 2020, and with the outbreak of COVID-19, a few instructors decided to offer synchronous online classes (where instructors were present online during class time and provided orientation and guidance just like a normal class) and a few others decided to offer asynchronous online classes (where orientation from the instructor was delivered asynchronous and the instructor was online during officially scheduled class time but interactions were more like office hours). Students were required to be present synchronously at the team level during the class time in a synchronous online class. In an asynchronous online class, students could be synchronous at the team level to complete their assignment any time prior to the deadline such that they could work during class time but they were not required to work at that time. Through this complete paper, we are trying to understand student learning, social presence and learner satisfaction with respect to different modes of instruction in a freshmen level Design Thinking course. Background: According to literature, synchronous online learning has advantages such as interaction, a classroom environment, and better course quality whereas asynchronous online learning has advantages such as self-controlled and self-directed learning. The disadvantages of synchronous online learning include the learning process, technology issues, and distraction. Social isolation, lack of interaction, and technology issue are a few disadvantages related to asynchronous online learning. Problem Being Addressed: There is a limited literature base investigating different modes of online instruction in a Design Thinking course. Through this paper, we are trying to understand and share the effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous modes of instruction in an online Flipped Design Thinking Course. The results of the paper could also help in this time of pandemic by shedding light on the more effective way to teach highly active group-based classrooms for better student learning, social presence, and learner satisfaction. Method/Assessment: An end of semester survey was monitored in Spring 2020 to understand student experiences in synchronous and asynchronous Design Thinking course sections. The survey was sent to 720 students enrolled in the course in Spring 2020 and 324 students responded to the survey. Learning was measured using the survey instrument developed by Walker (2003) and the social presence and learner satisfaction was measured by the survey modified by Richardson and Swan (2003). Likert scale was used to measure survey responses. Anticipated Results: Data would be analyzed and the paper would be completed by draft paper submission. As the course under study is a flipped and active course with a significant component of group work, the anticipated results after analysis could be that one mode of instruction has higher student learning, social presence, and learner satisfaction compared to the other.
more »
« less
On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting
Starting in March 2020, the COVID19 pandemic instantly affected the education of 14 million higher education students in the USA. The switch to remote instruction caught instructors and students off guard – teachers had to change their techniques, approaches, and course content rapidly (called “panicgogy”), and students had to adjust to remote instruction in a hurry. Hoping that the pandemic would not last too long, most had expected to return to the regular class format at most by the Fall semester. That expectation was quickly squashed as the summer semester progressed. If one were teaching a face-to-face classroom in a flipped modality, it would be even more challenging to teach a flipped class in an online environment. In this paper, we present how the instructor overhauled a face-to-face flipped class in Numerical Methods to an online environment. This involved 1) rethinking the learning design of the course content via the learning management system, 2) using Microsoft forms as personal response systems, and YouTube for video lectures, 3) not only using break-out rooms for peer-to-peer learning but the “main room” for individual learning as well, 4) exploit the availability of two computers and multiple monitors to deliver and observe the synchronous part of the class, 5) use of discussion boards to streamline the flow of communication that would have otherwise been unwieldy for the instructor, TAs, and students alike, 6) changes made to assessment as it had to be carried online and within a proctoring software environment, 7) changes in the conducting of office hours. The above items will be discussed in the paper, and comparisons of face-to-face and online implementations will be made. The ultimate goal is to present a logic model for a typical lecture-based online flipped STEM classroom for efficient and effective implementation by other instructors.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2013271
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10324423
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Since the 2014 high-profile meta-analysis of undergraduate STEM courses, active learning has become a standard in higher education pedagogy. One way to provide active learning is through the flipped classroom. However, finding suitable pre-class learning activities to improve student preparation and the subsequent classroom environment, including student engagement, can present a challenge in the flipped modality. To address this challenge, adaptive learning lessons were developed for pre-class learning for a course in Numerical Methods. The lessons would then be used as part of a study to determine their cognitive and affective impacts. Before the study could be started, it involved constructing well-thought-out adaptive lessons. This paper discusses developing, refining, and revising the adaptive learning platform (ALP) lessons for pre-class learning in a Numerical Methods flipped course. In a prior pilot study at a large public southeastern university, the first author had developed ALP lessons for the pre-class learning for four (Nonlinear Equations, Matrix Algebra, Regression, Integration) of the eight topics covered in a Numerical Methods course. In the current follow-on study, the first author and two other instructors who teach Numerical Methods, one from a large southwestern urban university and another from an HBCU, collaborated on developing the adaptive lessons for the whole course. The work began in Fall 2020 by enumerating the various chapters and breaking each one into individual lessons. Each lesson would include five sections (introduction, learning objectives, video lectures, textbook content, assessment). The three instructors met semi-monthly to discuss the content that would form each lesson. The main discussion of the meetings centered on what a student would be expected to learn before coming to class, choosing appropriate content, agreeing on prerequisites, and choosing and making new assessment questions. Lessons were then created by the first author and his student team using a commercially available platform called RealizeIT. The content was tested by learning assistants and instructors. It is important to note that significant, if not all, parts of the content, such as videos and textbook material, were available through previously done work. The new adaptive lessons and the revised existing ones were completed in December 2020. The adaptive lessons were tested for implementation in Spring 2021 at the first author's university and made 15% of the students' grade calculation. Questions asked by students during office hours, on the LMS discussion board, and via emails while doing the lessons were used to update content, clarify questions, and revise hints offered by the platform. For example, all videos in the ALP lessons were updated to HD quality based on student feedback. In addition, comments from the end-of-semester surveys conducted by an independent assessment analyst were collated to revise the adaptive lessons further. Examples include changing the textbook content format from an embedded PDF file to HTML to improve quality and meet web accessibility standards. The paper walks the reader through the content of a typical lesson. It also shows the type of data collected by the adaptive learning platform via three examples of student interactions with a single lesson.more » « less
-
Since the 2014 high-profile meta-analysis of undergraduate STEM courses, active learning has become a standard in higher education pedagogy. One way to provide active learning is through the flipped classroom. However, finding suitable pre-class learning activities to improve student preparation and the subsequent classroom environment, including student engagement, can present a challenge in the flipped modality. To address this challenge, adaptive learning lessons were developed for pre-class learning for a course in Numerical Methods. The lessons would then be used as part of a study to determine their cognitive and affective impacts. Before the study could be started, it involved constructing well-thought-out adaptive lessons. This paper discusses developing, refining, and revising the adaptive learning platform (ALP) lessons for pre-class learning in a Numerical Methods flipped course. In a prior pilot study at a large public southeastern university, the first author had developed ALP lessons for the pre-class learning for four (Nonlinear Equations, Matrix Algebra, Regression, Integration) of the eight topics covered in a Numerical Methods course. In the current follow-on study, the first author and two other instructors who teach Numerical Methods, one from a large southwestern urban university and another from an HBCU, collaborated on developing the adaptive lessons for the whole course. The work began in Fall 2020 by enumerating the various chapters and breaking each one into individual lessons. Each lesson would include five sections (introduction, learning objectives, video lectures, textbook content, assessment). The three instructors met semi-monthly to discuss the content that would form each lesson. The main discussion of the meetings centered on what a student would be expected to learn before coming to class, choosing appropriate content, agreeing on prerequisites, and choosing and making new assessment questions. Lessons were then created by the first author and his student team using a commercially available platform called RealizeIT. The content was tested by learning assistants and instructors. It is important to note that significant, if not all, parts of the content, such as videos and textbook material, were available through previously done work. The new adaptive lessons and the revised existing ones were completed in December 2020. The adaptive lessons were tested for implementation in Spring 2021 at the first author's university and made 15% of the students' grade calculation. Questions asked by students during office hours, on the LMS discussion board, and via emails while doing the lessons were used to update content, clarify questions, and revise hints offered by the platform. For example, all videos in the ALP lessons were updated to HD quality based on student feedback. In addition, comments from the end-of-semester surveys conducted by an independent assessment analyst were collated to revise the adaptive lessons further. Examples include changing the textbook content format from an embedded PDF file to HTML to improve quality and meet web accessibility standards. The paper walks the reader through the content of a typical lesson. It also shows the type of data collected by the adaptive learning platform via three examples of student interactions with a single lesson.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Student perceptions of the complete online transition of two CS courses in response to the COVID-19 pandemic Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, universities across the globe switched from traditional Face-to-Face (F2F) course delivery to completely online. Our university declared during our Spring break that students would not return to campus, and that all courses must be delivered fully online starting two weeks later. This was challenging to both students and instructors. In this evidence-based practice paper, we present results of end-of-semester student surveys from two Spring 2020 CS courses: a programming intensive CS2 course, and a senior theory course in Formal Languages and Automata (FLA). Students indicated course components they perceived as most beneficial to their learning, before and then after the online transition, and preferences for each regarding online vs. F2F. By comparing student reactions across courses, we gain insights on which components are easily adapted to online delivery, and which require further innovation. COVID was unfortunate, but gave a rare opportunity to compare students’ reflections on F2F instruction with online instructional materials for half a semester vs. entirely online delivery of the same course during the second half. The circumstances are unique, but we were able to acquire insights for future instruction. Some course components were perceived to be more useful either before or after the transition, and preferences were not the same in the two courses, possibly due to differences in the courses. Students in both courses found prerecorded asynchronous lectures significantly less useful than in-person lectures. For CS2, online office hours were significantly less useful than in-person office hours, but we found no significant difference in FLA. CS2 students felt less supported by their instructor after the online transition, but no significant difference was indicated by FLA students. FLA students found unproctored online exams offered through Canvas more stressful than in-person proctored exams, but the opposite was indicated by CS2 students. CS2 students indicated that visual materials from an eTextbook were more useful to them after going online than before, but FLA students indicated no significant difference. Overall, students in FLA significantly preferred the traditional F2F version of the course, while no significant difference was detected for CS2 students. We did not find significant effects from gender on the preference of one mode over the other. A serendipitous outcome was learning that some changes forced by circumstance should be considered for long term adoption. Offering online lab sessions and online exams where the questions are primarily multiple choice are possible candidates. However, we found that students need to feel the presence of their instructor to feel properly supported. To determine what course components need further improvement before transitioning to fully online mode, we computed a logistic regression model. The dependent variable is the student's preference for F2F or fully online. The independent variables are the course components before and after the online transition. For both courses, in-person lectures were a significant factor negatively affecting students' preferences of the fully online mode. Similarly, for CS2, in-person labs and in-person office hours were significant factors pushing students’ preferences toward F2F mode.more » « less
-
In this study, flipped instruction in an undergraduate engineering course in the ‘COVID’ online, remote environment was conducted and compared to onsite flipped instruction (i.e. pre-COVID) to explore potential changes in student perceptions. Student perceptions were gathered via survey instruments and investigated further through instructor interviews. This analysis was done at three universities and made possible by extensive research with the flipped classroom at these three schools as part of a previous NSF-funded study between 2014 and 2016. Results gathered in the online remote setting suggest positive changes in student perceptions of flipped instruction compared to the onsite environment, including the decreased perception of the ‘load’ imposed by the flipped classroom and the ‘effort‘’ required. Some desirable outcomes remained unchanged in the remote setting. The recent and emerging literature has suggested the remote, online environment dictated by the pandemic may be beneficial for flipped teaching and learning. These and other findings from conducting flipped classrooms at three engineering schools in the online environment are presented, including perceptions of the classroom environment (via the College and University Environment Inventory), benefits and drawbacks identified, student motivation levels, and perceived learning.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
