An official website of the United States government
Abstract The 2021 shallow plate‐boundary thrust‐faulting and 2023 outer rise normal‐faultingMW7.7 earthquakes southeast of the Loyalty Islands produced significant, well‐recorded tsunamis around the North and South Fiji Basins. The two earthquakes occurred in close proximity on opposing sides of the Southern Vanuatu Trench with similar seismic moments and east‐west rupture lengths but different faulting mechanisms. This provides a basis to examine tsunami sensitivity to source geometry and location for paths in the complex southwest Pacific region. Finite‐fault models of the source processes for both events were inverted from teleseismic body wave data with constraints from forward, nonhydrostatic modeling of regional tide gauge and seafloor pressure sensor recordings. The wave motions are reversed in sign, with a leading crest generated by 1.31 m uplift on the upper plate slope for the 2021 tsunami and a leading trough from 2.37 m subsidence on the subducting plate near the trench for the 2023 tsunami. The more recent outer rise normal faulting produces narrower seafloor deformation beneath deeper water resulting in shorter period tsunami waves that shoal and refract more effectively along seamounts and island chains to produce a more elaborate radiation pattern. The source location relative to seamounts and small islands in the near field influences the energy lobes and directionality of the far‐field tsunami to the north. In contrast, both events have very similar radiation patterns to the south due to absence of major bathymetric features immediately southward of the sources.
more »
« less
Shallow Megathrust Rupture during the 10 February 2021 Mw 7.7 Southeast Loyalty Islands earthquake sequence
On 10 February 2021, an MW 7.7 thrust earthquake ruptured the megathrust along the southeast Loyalty Islands within the strong bend in the plate boundary between the Australian plate and the North Fiji Basin. The mainshock involved rupture with ~50 s duration, with pure thrust slip concentrated in an east-west trending slip patch with up to 4.2 m of slip extending from 10 to 25 km depth. Slip at depths <10 km depth is negligible on the curved fault surface, which conforms to the SLAB2 interface model. Static stress drop estimates are ~5.5 MPa, and the radiated energy is 2.38 x 1015 J, with moment-scaled value of 5.7 x 10-6. The relatively shallow rupture from 10-25 km was moderately efficient in generating tsunami, with waves amplitudes up to 20 cm recorded in New Caledonia, New Zealand, Kermadec, and Fiji. Numerous M5+ normal-faulting aftershocks occur south of the trench, indicating effective stress change transfer from the megathrust to the bending flange of Australian plate that is negotiating the bend in the trench. Highly productive sequences involving paired thrust and normal faulting have occurred repeatedly westward along the northwest-trending portion of the Loyalty Islands region, also indicating unusually efficient stress communication.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1802364
- PAR ID:
- 10330536
- Editor(s):
- Koper, Keith
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Seismic record
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 2694-4006
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 154-163
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract The Shumagin seismic gap along the Alaska Peninsula experienced a major,MW7.8, interplate thrust earthquake on 22 July 2020. Several available finite‐fault inversions indicate patchy slip of up to 4 m at 8–48 km depth. There are differences among the models in peak slip and absolute placement of slip on the plate boundary, resulting from differences in data distributions, model parameterizations, and inversion algorithms. Two representative slip models obtained from inversions of large seismic and geodetic data sets produce very different tsunami predictions at tide gauges and deep‐water pressure sensors (DART stations), despite having only secondary differences in slip distribution. This is found to be the result of the acute sensitivity of the tsunami excitation for rupture below the continental shelf in proximity to an abrupt shelf break. Iteratively perturbing seismic and geodetic inversions by constraining fault model extent along dip and strike, we obtain an optimal rupture model compatible with teleseismicPandSHwaves, regional three‐component broadband and strong‐motion seismic recordings, hr‐GNSS time series and static offsets, as well as tsunami recordings at DART stations and regional and remote tide gauges. Slip is tightly bounded between 25 and 40 km depth, the up‐dip limit of slip in the earthquake is resolved to be well‐inland of the shelf break, and the rupture extent along strike is well‐constrained. The coseismic slip increased Coulomb stress on the shallow plate boundary extending to the trench, but the frictional behavior of the megathrust below the continental slope remains uncertain.more » « less
-
Abstract Strong tsunami excitation from slow rupture of shallow subduction zone faults is recognized as a key concern for tsunami hazard assessment. Three months after the 22 July 2020 magnitude 7.8 thrust earthquake struck the plate boundary below the Shumagin Islands, Alaska, a magnitude 7.6 aftershock ruptured with complex intraplate faulting. Despite the smaller size and predominantly strike-slip faulting mechanism inferred from seismic waves for the aftershock, it generated much larger tsunami waves than the mainshock. Here we show through detailed analysis of seismic, geodetic, and tsunami observations of the aftershock that the event implicated unprecedented source complexity, involving weakly tsunamigenic fast rupture of two intraplate faults located below and most likely above the plate boundary, along with induced strongly tsunamigenic slow thrust slip on a third fault near the shelf break likely striking nearly perpendicular to the trench. The thrust slip took over 5 min, giving no clear expression in seismic or geodetic observations while producing the sizeable far-field tsunami.more » « less
-
Abstract The eastern portion of the Shumagin gap along the Alaska Peninsula ruptured in anMW7.8 thrust earthquake on 22 July 2020. The megathrust fault space‐time slip history is determined by joint inversion of regional and teleseismic waveform data along with co‐seismic static Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) displacements. The rupture expanded westward and along‐dip from the hypocenter, located adjacent to the 1938MW8.2 Alaska earthquake, with slip and aftershocks extending into the gap about 180 to 205 km, respectively, at depths from 15 to 40 km. The deeper half of ~75% of the Shumagin gap experienced faulting. However, the patchy slip is significantly less than possible accumulated slip since the region's last major rupture in 1917, compatible with geodetic seismic‐coupling estimates of 10‐40% beneath the Shumagin Islands. The rupture terminated in the western region of very low seismic coupling. There was a regional decade‐scale decrease in b‐value prior to the 2020 event.more » « less
-
Abstract On 29 July 2021, anMW8.2 thrust‐faulting earthquake ruptured offshore of the Alaska Peninsula within the rupture zone of the 1938MW8.2 earthquake. The spatiotemporal distribution of megathrust slip is resolved by jointly inverting regional and teleseismic broadband waveforms along with co‐seismic static and high‐rate GNSS displacements. The primarily unilateral rupture expanded northeastward, away from the rupture zone of the 22 July 2020MW7.8 Shumagin earthquake. Large slip extends along approximately 175 km, spanning about two third of the estimated 1938 aftershock zone, with well‐bounded depth from 20 to 40 km, and up to 8.6 m slip near the hypocenter. The rupture terminated in the eastern portion of the 1938 aftershock zone in a region of very large geodetic slip deficit where peak slip appears to have occurred in the 1938 rupture. The 2021 and 1938 events do not have similar slip distributions and do not indicate persistent asperities.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210035
