An official website of the United States government
Abstract. With the greater application of machine learning models in educational contexts, it is important to understand where such meth- ods perform well as well as how they may be improved. As such, it is important to identify the factors that contribute to prediction error in order to develop targeted methods to enhance model accuracy and mitigate risks of algorithmic bias and unfairness. Prior works have led to the development and application of automated assessment methods that leverage machine learning and natural language processing. The performance of these methods have often been reported as being posi- tive, but other prior works have identified aspects on which they may be improved. Particularly in the context of mathematics, the presence of non-linguistic characters and expressions have been identified to con- tribute to observed model error. In this paper, we build upon this prior work by observing a developed automated assessment model for open- response questions in mathematics. We develop a new approach which we call the “Math Term Frequency” (MTF) model to address this issue caused by the presence of non-linguistic terms and ensemble it with the previously-developed assessment model. We observe that the inclusion of this approach notably improves model performance. Finally, we observe how well this ensembled method extrapolates to student responses in the context of Algorithms, a domain similarly characterized by a large number of non-linguistic terms and expressions. This work represents an example of practice of how error analyses can be leveraged to address model limitations.
more »
« less
Enhancing Auto-scoring of Student Open Responses in the Presence of Mathematical Terms and Expressions
Prior works have led to the development and application of automated assessment methods that leverage machine learning and nat- ural language processing. The performance of these methods have often been reported as being positive, but other prior works have identified aspects on which they may be improved. Particularly in the context of mathematics, the presence of non-linguistic characters and expressions have been identified to contribute to observed model error. In this paper, we build upon this prior work by observing a developed automated as- sessment model for open-response questions in mathematics. We develop a new approach which we call the “Math Term Frequency” (MTF) model to address this issue caused by the presence of non-linguistic terms and ensemble it with the previously-developed assessment model. We observe that the inclusion of this approach notably improves model performance, and present an example of practice of how error analyses can be leveraged to address model limitations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1903304
- PAR ID:
- 10331805
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- in press
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Advancements in online learning platforms have revolutionized education in multiple different ways, transforming the learning experiences and instructional practices. The development of natural language processing and machine learning methods have helped understand and process student languages, comprehend their learning state, and build automated supports for teachers. With this, there has been a growing body of research in developing automated methods to assess students’ work both in mathematical and nonmathematical domains. These automated methods address questions of two categories; closed-ended (with limited correct answers) and open-ended (are often subjective and have multiple correct answers), where open-ended questions are mostly used by teachers to learn about their student’s understanding of a particular concept. Manually assessing and providing feedback to these open-ended questions is often arduous and time-consuming for teachers. For this reason, there have been several works to understand student responses to these open-ended questions to automate the assessment and provide constructive feedback to students. In this research, we seek to improve such a prior method for assessment and feedback suggestions for student open-ended works in mathematics. For this, we present an error analysis of the prior method ”SBERT-Canberra” for auto-scoring, explore various factors that contribute to the error of the method, and propose solutions to improve upon the method by addressing these error factors. We further intend to expand this approach by improving feedback suggestions for teachers to give to their students’ open-ended work.more » « less
-
As computer-based learning platforms have become ubiquitous, there is a growing need to better support teachers. Particularly in mathematics, teachers often rely on openended questions to assess students’ understanding. While prior works focusing on the development of automated openended work assessments have demonstrated their potential, many of those methods require large amounts of student data to make reliable estimates. We explore whether a problem specific automated scoring model could benefit from auxiliary data collected from similar problems to address this “cold start” problem. We examine factors such as sample size and the magnitude of similarity of utilized problem data. We find the use of data from similar problems not only provides benefits to improve predictive performance by increasing sample size, but also leads to greater overall model performance than using data solely from the original problem when sample size is held constant.more » « less
-
As computer-based learning platforms have become ubiq- uitous, there is a growing need to better support teachers. Particularly in mathematics, teachers often rely on open- ended questions to assess students’ understanding. While prior works focusing on the development of automated open- ended work assessments have demonstrated their potential, many of those methods require large amounts of student data to make reliable estimates. We explore whether a prob- lem specific automated scoring model could benefit from auxiliary data collected from similar problems to address this “cold start” problem. We examine factors such as sam- ple size and the magnitude of similarity of utilized problem data. We find the use of data from similar problems not only provides benefits to improve predictive performance by in- creasing sample size, but also leads to greater overall model performance than using data solely from the original prob- lem when sample size is held constant.more » « less
-
Abstract As use of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased, concerns about AI bias and discrimination have been growing. This paper discusses an application called PyrEval in which natural language processing (NLP) was used to automate assessment and provide feedback on middle school science writing without linguistic discrimination. Linguistic discrimination in this study was operationalized as unfair assessment of scientific essays based on writing features that are not considered normative such as subject‐verb disagreement. Such unfair assessment is especially problematic when the purpose of assessment is not assessing English writing but rather assessing the content of scientific explanations. PyrEval was implemented in middle school science classrooms. Students explained their roller coaster design by stating relationships among such science concepts as potential energy, kinetic energy and law of conservation of energy. Initial and revised versions of scientific essays written by 307 eighth‐grade students were analyzed. Our manual and NLP assessment comparison analysis showed that PyrEval did not penalize student essays that contained non‐normative writing features. Repeated measures ANOVAs and GLMM analysis results revealed that essay quality significantly improved from initial to revised essays after receiving the NLP feedback, regardless of non‐normative writing features. Findings and implications are discussed. Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topicAdvancement in AI has created a variety of opportunities in education, including automated assessment, but AI is not bias‐free.Automated writing assessment designed to improve students' scientific explanations has been studied.While limited, some studies reported biased performance of automated writing assessment tools, but without looking into actual linguistic features about which the tools may have discriminated.What this paper addsThis study conducted an actual examination of non‐normative linguistic features in essays written by middle school students to uncover how our NLP tool called PyrEval worked to assess them.PyrEval did not penalize essays containing non‐normative linguistic features.Regardless of non‐normative linguistic features, students' essay quality scores significantly improved from initial to revised essays after receiving feedback from PyrEval. Essay quality improvement was observed regardless of students' prior knowledge, school district and teacher variables.Implications for practice and/or policyThis paper inspires practitioners to attend to linguistic discrimination (re)produced by AI.This paper offers possibilities of using PyrEval as a reflection tool, to which human assessors compare their assessment and discover implicit bias against non‐normative linguistic features.PyrEval is available for use ongithub.com/psunlpgroup/PyrEvalv2.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
