- Award ID(s):
- 1907434
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10333666
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Biofabrication
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1758-5082
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 015011
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
With the rapid development and popularization of additive manufacturing, different technologies, including, but not limited to, extrusion-, droplet-, and vat-photopolymerization-based fabrication techniques, have emerged that have allowed tremendous progress in three-dimensional (3D) printing in the past decades. Bioprinting, typically using living cells and/or biomaterials conformed by different printing modalities, has produced functional tissues. As a subclass of vat-photopolymerization bioprinting, digital light processing (DLP) uses digitally controlled photomasks to selectively solidify liquid photocurable bioinks to construct complex physical objects in a layer-by-layer manner. DLP bioprinting presents unique advantages, including short printing times, relatively low manufacturing costs, and decently high resolutions, allowing users to achieve significant progress in the bioprinting of tissue-like complex structures. Nevertheless, the need to accommodate different materials while bioprinting and improve the printing performance has driven the rapid progress in DLP bioprinters, which requires multiple pieces of knowledge ranging from optics, electronics, software, and materials beyond the biological aspects. This raises the need for a comprehensive review to recapitulate the most important considerations in the design and assembly of DLP bioprinters. This review begins with analyzing unique considerations and specific examples in the hardware, including the resin vat, optical system, and electronics. In the software, the workflow is analyzed, including the parameters to be considered for the control of the bioprinter and the voxelizing/slicing algorithm. In addition, we briefly discuss the material requirements for DLP bioprinting. Then, we provide a section with best practices and maintenance of a do-it-yourself DLP bioprinter. Finally, we highlight the future outlooks of the DLP technology and their critical role in directing the future of bioprinting. The state-of-the-art progress in DLP bioprinter in this review will provide a set of knowledge for innovative DLP bioprinter designs.more » « less
-
Digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing has become a powerful manufacturing tool for the fast fabrication of complex functional structures. The rapid progress in DLP 3D printing has been linked to research on optical design factors and ink selection. This critical review highlights the main challenges in the DLP 3D printing of photopolymerizable inks. The kinetics equations of photopolymerization reaction in a DLP printer are solved, and the dependence of curing depth on the process optical parameters and ink chemical properties are explained. Developments in DLP platform design and ink selection are summarized, and the roles of monomer structure and molecular weight on printing resolution are shown by experimental data. A detailed guideline is presented to help engineers and scientists to select inks and optical parameters for fabricating functional structures for multi-material and 4D printing.more » « less
-
Abstract 3D bioprinting is a fabrication method with many biomedical applications, particularly within tissue engineering. The use of freezing during 3D bioprinting, aka "3D cryoprinting," can be utilized to create micopores within tissue-engineered scaffolds to enhance cell proliferation. When used with alginate bioinks, this type of 3D cryoprinting requires three steps: 3D printing, crosslinking, and freezing. This study investigated the influence of crosslinking order and cooling rate on the microstructure and mechanical properties of sodium alginate scaffolds. We designed and built a novel modular 3D printer in order to study the effects of these steps separately and to address many of the manufacturing issues associated with 3D cryoprinting. With the modular 3D printer, 3D printing, crosslinking, and freezing were conducted on separate modules yet remain part of a continuous manufacturing process. Crosslinking before the freezing step produced highly interconnected and directional pores, which are ideal for promoting cell growth. By controlling the cooling rate, it was possible to produce pores with diameters from a range of 5 μm to 40 μm. Tensile and firmness testing found that the use of freezing does not decrease the tensile strength of the printed objects, though there was a significant loss in firmness for strands with larger pores.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract When using light-based three-dimensional (3D) printing methods to fabricate functional micro-devices, unwanted light scattering during the printing process is a significant challenge to achieve high-resolution fabrication. We report the use of a deep neural network (NN)-based machine learning (ML) technique to mitigate the scattering effect, where our NN was employed to study the highly sophisticated relationship between the input digital masks and their corresponding output 3D printed structures. Furthermore, the NN was used to model an inverse 3D printing process, where it took desired printed structures as inputs and subsequently generated grayscale digital masks that optimized the light exposure dose according to the desired structures’ local features. Verification results showed that using NN-generated digital masks yielded significant improvements in printing fidelity when compared with using masks identical to the desired structures.more » « less
-
Abstract The utility of visible light for 3D printing has increased in recent years owing to its accessibility and reduced materials interactions, such as scattering and absorption/degradation, relative to traditional UV light‐based processes. However, photosystems that react efficiently with visible light often require multiple molecular components and have strong and diverse absorption profiles, increasing the complexity of formulation and printing optimization. Herein, a streamlined method to select and optimize visible light 3D printing conditions is described. First, green light liquid crystal display (LCD) 3D printing using a novel resin is optimized through traditional empirical methods, which involves resin component selection, spectroscopic characterization, time‐intensive 3D printing under several different conditions, and measurements of dimensional accuracy for each printed object. Subsequent analytical quantification of dynamic photon absorption during green light polymerizations unveils relationships to cure depth that enables facile resin and 3D printing optimization using a model that is a modification to the Jacob's equation traditionally used for stereolithographic 3D printing. The approach and model are then validated using a distinct green light‐activated resin for two types of projection‐based 3D printing.