Are Mutated Misinformation More Contagious? A Case Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
- Award ID(s):
- 2027713
- PAR ID:
- 10334377
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of Web Science 2022 (WebSci 2022)
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Recent years have seen a surge in research on why people fall for misinformation and what can be done about it. Drawing on a framework that conceptualizes truth judgments of true and false information as a signal-detection problem, the current article identifies three inaccurate assumptions in the public and scientific discourse about misinformation: (1) People are bad at discerning true from false information, (2) partisan bias is not a driving force in judgments of misinformation, and (3) gullibility to false information is the main factor underlying inaccurate beliefs. Counter to these assumptions, we argue that (1) people are quite good at discerning true from false information, (2) partisan bias in responses to true and false information is pervasive and strong, and (3) skepticism against belief-incongruent true information is much more pronounced than gullibility to belief-congruent false information. These conclusions have significant implications for person-centered misinformation interventions to tackle inaccurate beliefs.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

