An official website of the United States government
Abstract The assumptions of paleointensity experiments are violated in many natural and archeological materials, leading to Arai plots which do not appear linear and yield inaccurate paleointensity estimates, leading to bias in the result. Recently, paleomagnetists have adopted sets of “selection criteria” that exclude specimens with nonlinear Arai plots from the analysis, but there is little consensus in the paleomagnetic community on which set to use. In this study, we present a statistical method we call Bias Corrected Estimation of Paleointensity (BiCEP), which assumes that the paleointensity recorded by each specimen is biased away from a true answer by an amount that is dependent a single metric of nonlinearity (the curvature parameter) on the Arai plot. We can use this empirical relationship to estimate the recorded paleointensity for a specimen where, that is, a perfectly straight line. We apply the BiCEP method to a collection of 30 sites for which the true value of the original field is well constrained. Our method returns accurate estimates of paleointensity, with similar levels of accuracy and precision to restrictive sets of paleointensity criteria, but accepting as many sites as permissive criteria. The BiCEP method has a significant advantage over using these selection criteria because it achieves these accurate results without excluding large numbers of specimens from the analysis. It yields accurate, albeit imprecise estimates from sites whose specimens all fail traditional criteria. BiCEP combines the accuracy of the strictest selection criteria with the low failure rates of the less reliable “loose” criteria.
more »
« less
Bias Corrected Estimation of Paleointensity (BiCEP): An improved methodology for obtaining paleointensity estimates (Dataset)
- Award ID(s):
- 1827263
- PAR ID:
- 10340659
- Publisher / Repository:
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Date Published:
- Edition / Version:
- 1
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Extrusive Igneous Archeologic Synthetic Submarine Glassy Margin Brick Lava Flow Slag Pyroclastite Lava flow Synthetic Submarine basaltic glass Not specified Basalt Volcaniclastic Andesite Submarine Basaltic Glass Not Specified Trachyte -43 107 Years BP
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Lunar paleomagnetic studies have identified multidomain metallic Fe–Ni alloys as the dominant magnetic contributors in mare basalts. Here, we explore the low‐temperature magnetic behavior of standard samples for a suite of opaque minerals that occur within mare basalts (single‐domain and multidomain Fe, wüstite, ulvöspinel, iron chromite, ilmenite, and troilite). We compare the observed low‐temperature behaviors to those of several Apollo mare basalt samples (10003, 10044, 10020, 10069, 10071, 12009, 12022, 15597). Notable magnetic transitions were detected at 30 K (ilmenite), 60–80 K (chromite, troilite), and 100–125 K (ulvöspinel, chromite). We also investigated the effects of low‐temperature cycling on mare basalt remanence and observed that only grains with coercivities 20–40 mT were cleaned. This suggests a minimal impact of diurnal temperature cycling at the lunar surface on the retrieved lunar paleointensity values. Using comprehensive electron microscopy techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS), x‐ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we further examined magnetic phases within four Apollo 11 mare basalt samples. Our findings revealed the presence of Fe grains (one to 10 μm in diameter) associated with troilite contain sub‐grains ranging in size from tens to hundreds of nanometers in some samples. These grains, which fall within the single‐domain to multi‐domain range as observed in their first‐order reversal curves, might have the potential to retain high coercivity components and thereby effectively record an ancient dynamo field.more » « less
