An official website of the United States government
Federated learning (FL) is a learning paradigm that allows the central server to learn from different data sources while keeping the data private locally. Without controlling and monitoring the local data collection process, the locally available training labels are likely noisy, i.e., the collected training labels differ from the unobservable ground truth. Additionally, in heterogenous FL, each local client may only have access to a subset of label space (referred to as openset label learning), meanwhile without overlapping with others. In this work, we study the challenge of FL with local openset noisy labels. We observe that many existing solutions in the noisy label literature, e.g., loss correction, are ineffective during local training due to overfitting to noisy labels and being not generalizable to openset labels. For the methods in FL, different estimated metrics are shared. To address the problems, we design a label communication mechanism that shares "contrastive labels" randomly selected from clients with the server. The privacy of the shared contrastive labels is protected by label differential privacy (DP). Both the DP guarantee and the effectiveness of our approach are theoretically guaranteed. Compared with several baseline methods, our solution shows its efficiency in several public benchmarks and real-world datasets under different noise ratios and noise models.
more »
« less
On Learning Contrastive Representations for Learning With Noisy Labels
Deep neural networks are able to memorize noisy labels easily with a softmax cross entropy (CE) loss. Previous studies attempted to address this issue focus on incorporating a noise-robust loss function to the CE loss. However, the memorization issue is alleviated but still remains due to the non-robust CE loss. To address this issue, we focus on learning robust contrastive representations of data on which the classifier is hard to memorize the label noise under the CE loss. We propose a novel contrastive regularization function to learn such representations over noisy data where the label noise does not dominate the representation learning. By theoretically investigating the representations induced by the proposed regularization function, we reveal that the learned representations keep information related to true labels and discard information related to corrupted labels from images. Moreover, our theoretical results also indicate that the learned representations are robust to the label noise. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the efficacy of our method.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1922658
- PAR ID:
- 10342150
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Recent relation extraction (RE) works have shown encouraging improvements by conducting contrastive learning on silver labels generated by distant supervision before fine-tuning on gold labels. Existing methods typically assume all these silver labels are accurate and treat them equally; however, distant supervision is inevitably noisy–some silver labels are more reliable than others. In this paper, we propose fine-grained contrastive learning (FineCL) for RE, which leverages fine-grained information about which silver labels are and are not noisy to improve the quality of learned relationship representations for RE. We first assess the quality of silver labels via a simple and automatic approach we call “learning order denoising,” where we train a language model to learn these relations and record the order of learned training instances. We show that learning order largely corresponds to label accuracy–early-learned silver labels have, on average, more accurate labels than later-learned silver labels. Then, during pre-training, we increase the weights of accurate labels within a novel contrastive learning objective. Experiments on several RE benchmarks show that FineCL makes consistent and significant performance gains over state-of-the-art methods.more » « less
-
The label noise transition matrix, denoting the transition probabilities from clean labels to noisy labels, is crucial for designing statistically robust solutions. Existing estimators for noise transition matrices, e.g., using either anchor points or clusterability, focus on computer vision tasks that are relatively easier to obtain high-quality representations. We observe that tasks with lower-quality features fail to meet the anchor-point or clusterability condition, due to the coexistence of both uninformative and informative representations. To handle this issue, we propose a generic and practical information-theoretic approach to down-weight the less informative parts of the lower-quality features. This improvement is crucial to identifying and estimating the label noise transition matrix. The salient technical challenge is to compute the relevant information-theoretical metrics using only noisy labels instead of clean ones. We prove that the celebrated f-mutual information measure can often preserve the order when calculated using noisy labels. We then build our transition matrix estimator using this distilled version of features. The necessity and effectiveness of the proposed method are also demonstrated by evaluating the estimation error on a varied set of tabular data and text classification tasks with lower-quality features.more » « less
-
Daumé III, Hal; Singh, Aarti (Ed.)Learning with noisy labels is a common challenge in supervised learning. Existing approaches often require practitioners to specify noise rates, i.e., a set of parameters controlling the severity of label noises in the problem, and the specifications are either assumed to be given or estimated using additional steps. In this work, we introduce a new family of loss functions that we name as peer loss functions, which enables learning from noisy labels and does not require a priori specification of the noise rates. Peer loss functions work within the standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework. We show that, under mild conditions, performing ERM with peer loss functions on the noisy data leads to the optimal or a near-optimal classifier as if performing ERM over the clean training data, which we do not have access to. We pair our results with an extensive set of experiments. Peer loss provides a way to simplify model development when facing potentially noisy training labels, and can be promoted as a robust candidate loss function in such situations.more » « less
-
Label differential privacy is a relaxation of differential privacy for machine learning scenarios where the labels are the only sensitive information that needs to be protected in the training data. For example, imagine a survey from a participant in a university class about their vaccination status. Some attributes of the students are publicly available but their vaccination status is sensitive information and must remain private. Now if we want to train a model that predicts whether a student has received vaccination using only their public information, we can use label-DP. Recent works on label-DP use different ways of adding noise to the labels in order to obtain label-DP models. In this work, we present novel techniques for training models with label-DP guarantees by leveraging unsupervised learning and semi-supervised learning, enabling us to inject less noise while obtaining the same privacy, therefore achieving a better utility-privacy trade-off. We first introduce a framework that starts with an unsupervised classifier f0 and dataset D with noisy label set Y , reduces the noise in Y using f0 , and then trains a new model f using the less noisy dataset. Our noise reduction strategy uses the model f0 to remove the noisy labels that are incorrect with high probability. Then we use semi-supervised learning to train a model using the remaining labels. We instantiate this framework with multiple ways of obtaining the noisy labels and also the base classifier. As an alternative way to reduce the noise, we explore the effect of using unsupervised learning: we only add noise to a majority voting step for associating the learned clusters with a cluster label (as opposed to adding noise to individual labels); the reduced sensitivity enables us to add less noise. Our experiments show that these techniques can significantly outperform the prior works on label-DP.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.01785
