skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: The Costs and Benefits of Plant–Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Interactions
The symbiotic interaction between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi is often perceived as beneficial for both partners, though a large ecological literature highlights the context dependency of this interaction. Changes in abiotic variables, such as nutrient availability, can drive the interaction along the mutualism-parasitism continuum with variable outcomes for plant growth and fitness. However, AM fungi can benefit plants in more ways than improved phosphorus nutrition and plant growth. For example, AM fungi can promote abiotic and biotic stress tolerance even when considered parasitic from a nutrient provision perspective. Other than being obligate biotrophs, very little is known about the benefits AM fungi gain from plants. In this review, we utilize both molecular biology and ecological approaches to expand our understanding of the plant–AM fungal interaction across disciplines.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2021932
PAR ID:
10342243
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Annual Review of Plant Biology
Volume:
73
Issue:
1
ISSN:
1543-5008
Page Range / eLocation ID:
649 to 672
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract The plant microbiome is critical to plant health and is degraded with anthropogenic disturbance. However, the value of re‐establishing the native microbiome is rarely considered in ecological restoration. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are particularly important microbiome components, as they associate with most plants, and later successional grassland plants are strongly responsive to native AM fungi.With five separate sites across the United States, we inoculated mid‐ and late successional plant seedlings with one of three types of native microbiome amendments: (a) whole rhizosphere soil collected from local old‐growth, undisturbed grassland communities in Illinois, Kansas or Oklahoma, (b) laboratory cultured AM fungi from these same old‐growth grassland sites or (c) no microbiome amendment. We also seeded each restoration with a diverse native seed mixture. Plant establishment and growth was followed for three growing seasons.The reintroduction of soil microbiome from native ecosystems improved restoration establishment.Including only native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities produced similar improvements in plant establishment as what was found with whole soil microbiome amendment. These findings were robust across plant functional groups.Inoculated plants (amended with either AM fungi or whole soil) also grew more leaves and were generally taller during the three growing seasons.Synthesis and applications. Our research shows that mycorrhizal fungi can accelerate plant succession and that the reintroduction of both whole soil and laboratory cultivated native mycorrhizal fungi can be used as tools to improve native plant restoration following anthropogenic disturbance. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Many of the disturbance‐sensitive, late successional plant species in grasslands respond to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi more positively via growth and establishment than plants that readily establish in disturbed areas (i.e. early successional species). Inoculation with AM fungi can therefore aid the establishment of late successional species in disturbed areas. If the differential benefit of AM fungi to late versus early successional plants is context‐dependent, however, this advantage could be diminished in high phosphorus (P) post‐agricultural soils or in future climates with altered precipitation.In this greenhouse experiment, we tested if late successional plant species are less plastic in their reliance on AM fungi than early successional plants by growing 17 plant species of different successional status (9 early and 8 late successional) in full factorial combinations of inoculated or uninoculated with AM fungi, with ambient or high P levels, and with low or high levels of water.AM fungi positively affected the biomass of the 17 grassland plant species, but across all environments, late successional plant species generally responded more positively to AM fungi than early successional plants species.AM fungal growth promotion and change in below‐ground biomass allocation was generally diminished with P fertilizer across all plant species, and while there was significant variation among plant species in the sensitivity of AM fungal responsiveness to P fertilization, this differential sensitivity was not predicted by plant successional status.The role of AM fungi in plant growth promotion was not generally altered by variation in watering, however late successional plant species allocated a greater proportion of their biomass below‐ground in response to AM fungi in low versus high water conditions.Synthesis. Overall greater responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi by late successional species is consistent with an important role of AM fungi in plant succession, even while AM fungi are less impactful overall in high P soils. However, the increase in responsiveness of below‐ground allocation of late successional species to AM fungi in low water conditions suggests that successional dynamics may be more dependent on AM fungi in future climates that feature greater propensity for drought. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Nutrient exchange forms the basis of the ancient symbiotic relationship that occurs between most land plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Plants provide carbon (C) to AM fungi and fungi provide the plant with nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P). Nutrient addition can alter this symbiotic coupling in key ways, such as reducing AM fungal root colonization and changing the AM fungal community composition. However, environmental parameters that differentiate ecosystems and drive plant distribution patterns (e.g., pH, moisture), are also known to impact AM fungal communities. Identifying the relative contribution of environmental factors impacting AM fungal distribution patterns is important for predicting biogeochemical cycling patterns and plant‐microbe relationships across ecosystems. To evaluate the relative impacts of local environmental conditions and long‐term nutrient addition on AM fungal abundance and composition across grasslands, we studied experimental plots amended for 10 years with N, P, or N and P fertilizer in different grassland ecosystem types, including tallgrass prairie, montane, shortgrass prairie, and desert grasslands. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found ecosystem type, not nutrient treatment, was the main driver of AM fungal root colonization, diversity, and community composition, even when accounting for site‐specific nutrient limitations. We identified several important environmental drivers of grassland ecosystem AM fungal distribution patterns, including aridity, mean annual temperature, root moisture, and soil pH. This work provides empirical evidence for niche partitioning strategies of AM fungal functional guilds and emphasizes the importance of long‐term, large scale research projects to provide ecologically relevant context to nutrient addition studies. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Both mutualistic and pathogenic soil microbes are known to play important roles in shaping the fitness of plants, likely affecting plants at different life cycle stages.In order to investigate the differential effects of native soil mutualists and pathogens on plant fitness, we compared survival and reproduction of two annual tallgrass prairie plant species (Chamaecrista fasciculataandCoreopsis tinctoria) in a field study using 3 soil inocula treatments containing different compositions of microbes. The soil inocula types included fresh native whole soil taken from a remnant prairie containing both native mutualists and pathogens, soil enhanced with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi derived from remnant prairies, and uninoculated controls.For both species, plants inoculated with native prairie AM fungi performed much better than those in uninoculated soil for all parts of the life cycle. Plants in the native whole prairie soil were either generally similar to plants in the uninoculated soil or had slightly higher survival or reproduction.Overall, these results suggest that native prairie AM fungi can have important positive effects on the fitness of early successional plants. As inclusion of prairie AM fungi and pathogens decreased plant fitness relative to prairie AM fungi alone, we expect that native pathogens also can have large effects on fitness of these annuals. Our findings support the use of AM fungi to enhance plant establishment in prairie restorations. 
    more » « less
  5. As temperatures rise, plants are expected to shift their ranges to align with their abiotic niches. If plants do not encounter suitable mycorrhizal fungi in new habitats, however, these migrations may fail. We review the literature to describe how arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi, and ericoid mycorrhizal (ErM) fungi currently vary within and beyond host plants’ ranges and how these mycorrhizal fungi shape plant ranges. We introduce a framework that predicts when plants are likely to encounter suitable mycorrhizal mutualists in new habitats. Critically, the probability of beneficial plant-mycorrhizal fungal interactions depends on 1) plants’ specificity to mycorrhizal fungi, 2) abiotic distance between historic and new ranges, 3) plants’ relatedness to new range plants, 4) geographic distance between historic and new ranges, and 5) the alignment of plant and mycorrhizal fungal niches, all of which are moderated by mycorrhizal guild. Finally, we review research frontiers in the field of plant-mycorrhizal fungal interactions. 
    more » « less