skip to main content

Title: A Progressive Approximation Approach for the Exact Solution of Sparse Large-Scale Binary Interdiction Games
We present a progressive approximation algorithm for the exact solution of several classes of interdiction games in which two noncooperative players (namely an attacker and a follower) interact sequentially. The follower must solve an optimization problem that has been previously perturbed by means of a series of attacking actions led by the attacker. These attacking actions aim at augmenting the cost of the decision variables of the follower’s optimization problem. The objective, from the attacker’s viewpoint, is that of choosing an attacking strategy that reduces as much as possible the quality of the optimal solution attainable by the follower. The progressive approximation mechanism consists of the iterative solution of an interdiction problem in which the attacker actions are restricted to a subset of the whole solution space and a pricing subproblem invoked with the objective of proving the optimality of the attacking strategy. This scheme is especially useful when the optimal solutions to the follower’s subproblem intersect with the decision space of the attacker only in a small number of decision variables. In such cases, the progressive approximation method can solve interdiction games otherwise intractable for classical methods. We illustrate the efficiency of our approach on the shortest path, 0-1 more » knapsack and facility location interdiction games. Summary of Contribution: In this article, we present a progressive approximation algorithm for the exact solution of several classes of interdiction games in which two noncooperative players (namely an attacker and a follower) interact sequentially. We exploit the discrete nature of this interdiction game to design an effective algorithmic framework that improves the performance of general-purpose solvers. Our algorithm combines elements from mathematical programming and computer science, including a metaheuristic algorithm, a binary search procedure, a cutting-planes algorithm, and supervalid inequalities. Although we illustrate our results on three specific problems (shortest path, 0-1 knapsack, and facility location), our algorithmic framework can be extended to a broader class of interdiction problems. « less
Award ID(s):
Publication Date:
Journal Name:
INFORMS Journal on Computing
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
890 to 908
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Traditionally, in the bilevel optimization framework, a leader chooses her actions by solving an upper-level problem, assuming that a follower chooses an optimal reaction by solving a lower-level problem. However, in many settings, the lower-level problems might be nontrivial, thus requiring the use of tailored algorithms for their solution. More importantly, in practice, such problems might be inexactly solved by heuristics and approximation algorithms. Motivated by this consideration, we study a broad class of bilevel optimization problems where the follower might not optimally react to the leader’s actions. In particular, we present a modeling framework in which the leader considers that the follower might use one of a number of known algorithms to solve the lower-level problem, either approximately or heuristically. Thus, the leader can hedge against the follower’s use of suboptimal solutions. We provide algorithmic implementations of the framework for a class of nonlinear bilevel knapsack problem (BKP), and we illustrate the potential impact of incorporating this realistic feature through numerical experiments in the context of defender-attacker problems.
  2. Mixed strategies are often evaluated based on the expected payoff that they guarantee. This is not always desirable. In this paper, we consider games for which maximizing the expected payoff deviates from the actual goal of the players. To address this issue, we introduce the notion of a (u,p)-maxmin strategy which ensures receiving a minimum utility of u with probability at least p. We then give approximation algorithms for the problem of finding a (u, p)-maxmin strategy for these games. The first game that we consider is Colonel Blotto, a well-studied game that was introduced in 1921. In the Colonel Blotto game, two colonels divide their troops among a set of battlefields. Each battlefield is won by the colonel that puts more troops in it. The payoff of each colonel is the weighted number of battlefields that she wins. We show that maximizing the expected payoff of a player does not necessarily maximize her winning probability for certain applications of Colonel Blotto. For example, in presidential elections, the players’ goal is to maximize the probability of winning more than half of the votes, rather than maximizing the expected number of votes that they get. We give an exact algorithm formore »a natural variant of continuous version of this game. More generally, we provide constant and logarithmic approximation algorithms for finding (u, p)-maxmin strategies. We also introduce a security game version of Colonel Blotto which we call auditing game. It is played between two players, a defender and an attacker. The goal of the defender is to prevent the attacker from changing the outcome of an instance of Colonel Blotto. Again, maximizing the expected payoff of the defender is not necessarily optimal. Therefore we give a constant approximation for (u, p)-maxmin strategies.« less
  3. We study the chance-constrained bin packing problem, with an application to hospital operating room planning. The bin packing problem allocates items of random sizes that follow a discrete distribution to a set of bins with limited capacity, while minimizing the total cost. The bin capacity constraints are satisfied with a given probability. We investigate a big-M and a 0-1 bilinear formulation of this problem. We analyze the bilinear structure of the formulation and use the lifting techniques to identify cover, clique, and projection inequalities to strengthen the formulation. We show that in certain cases these inequalities are facet-defining for a bilinear knapsack constraint that arises in the reformulation. An extensive computational study is conducted for the operating room planning problem that minimizes the number of open operating rooms. The computational tests are performed using problems generated based on real data from a hospital. A lower-bound improvement heuristic is combined with the cuts proposed in this paper in a branch-and-cut framework. The computations illustrate that the techniques developed in this paper can significantly improve the performance of the branch-and-cut method. Problems with up to 1,000 scenarios are solved to optimality in less than an hour. A safe approximation based on conditionalmore »value at risk (CVaR) is also solved. The computations show that the CVaR approximation typically leaves a gap of one operating room (e.g., six instead of five) to satisfy the chance constraint. Summary of Contribution: This paper investigates a branch-and-cut algorithm for a chance-constrained bin packing problem with multiple bins. The chance-constrained bin packing provides a modeling framework for applied operations research problems, such as health care, scheduling, and so on. This paper studies alternative computational approaches to solve this problem. Moreover, this paper uses real data from a hospital operating room planning setting as an application to test the algorithmic ideas. This work, therefore, is at the intersection of computing and operations research. Several interesting ideas are developed and studied. These include a strengthened big-M reformulation, analysis of a bilinear reformulation, and identifying certain facet-defining inequalities for this formulation. This paper also gives a lower-bound generation heuristic for a model that minimizes the number of bins. Computational experiments for an operating room planning model that uses data from a hospital demonstrate the computational improvement and importance of the proposed approaches. The techniques proposed in this paper and computational experiments further enhance the interface of computing and operations research.« less
  4. Adjustable robust optimization (ARO) involves recourse decisions (i.e. reactive actions after the realization of the uncertainty, ‘wait-and-see’) as functions of the uncertainty, typically posed in a two-stage stochastic setting. Solving the general ARO problems is challenging, therefore ways to reduce the computational effort have been proposed, with the most popular being the affine decision rules, where ‘wait-and-see’ decisions are approximated as affine adjustments of the uncertainty. In this work we propose a novel method for the derivation of generalized affine decision rules for linear mixed-integer ARO problems through multi-parametric programming, that lead to the exact and global solution of the ARO problem. The problem is treated as a multi-level programming problem and it is then solved using a novel algorithm for the exact and global solution of multi-level mixed-integer linear programming problems. The main idea behind the proposed approach is to solve the lower optimization level of the ARO problem parametrically, by considering ‘here-and-now’ variables and uncertainties as parameters. This will result in a set of affine decision rules for the ‘wait-and-see’ variables as a function of ‘here-and-now’ variables and uncertainties for their entire feasible space. A set of illustrative numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the potential of themore »proposed novel approach.« less
  5. Recent empirical evidence suggests that the Weston-Watkins support vector machine is among the best performing multiclass extensions of the binary SVM. Current state-of-the-art solvers repeatedly solve a particular subproblem approximately using an iterative strategy. In this work, we propose an algorithm that solves the subproblem exactly using a novel reparametrization of the Weston-Watkins dual problem. For linear WW-SVMs, our solver shows significant speed-up over the state-of-the-art solver when the number of classes is large. Our exact subproblem solver also allows us to prove linear convergence of the overall solver.