An official website of the United States government
Abstract This paper presents a taxonomy (hierarchical organization) of hydrological processes; specifically, runoff generation processes in natural watersheds. Over 130 process names were extracted from a literature review of papers describing experimental watersheds, perceptual models, and runoff processes in a range of hydro‐climatic environments. Processes were arranged into a hierarchical structure, and presented as a spreadsheet and interactive diagram. For each process, additional information was provided: a list of alternative names for the same process, a classification into hydrological function (e.g., flux, storage, release) and a unique identifier similar to a hashtag. We hope that the proposed hierarchy will prompt collaboration and debate in the hydrologic community into naming and organizing processes, towards a comprehensive taxonomy. The taxonomy provides a method to label and search hydrological knowledge, thereby facilitating synthesis and comparison of processes across watersheds.
more »
« less
Could a Focus on the “Why” of Taxonomy Help Taxonomy Better Respond to the Needs of Science and Society?
Genomics has put prokaryotic rank-based taxonomy on a solid phylogenetic foundation. However, most taxonomic ranks were set long before the advent of DNA sequencing and genomics. In this concept paper, we thus ask the following question: should prokaryotic classification schemes besides the current phylum-to-species ranks be explored, developed, and incorporated into scientific discourse? Could such alternative schemes provide better solutions to the basic need of science and society for which taxonomy was developed, namely, precise and meaningful identification? A neutral genome-similarity based framework is then described that could allow alternative classification schemes to be explored, compared, and translated into each other without having to choose only one as the gold standard. Classification schemes could thus continue to evolve and be selected according to their benefits and based on how well they fulfill the need for prokaryotic identification.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2018522
- PAR ID:
- 10347150
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Volume:
- 13
- ISSN:
- 1664-302X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Giant hummingbirds (Patagona spp.) are extraordinarily large hummingbirds whose taxonomy has been muddled for two centuries. Patagona systematics were recently redefined in a study of migration, physiology, and genomics, revealing two species: the Northern Giant Hummingbird and Southern Giant Hummingbird. Here, we re-evaluate taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus in light of its newly clarified biology and species limits, analysing data from 608 specimens and wild-caught individuals spanning 1864–2023. The forms gigas and peruviana were both described based on multiple syntypes. The possible syntypes for Patagona gigas are dubious, so we designate a neotype for this taxon. The genetic identity of the peruviana lectotype remains untested, but its plumage appears to match the northern species. We critically considered the identity and usage of gigas and peruviana, respectively, and examined identification challenges that fostered taxonomic uncertainty. We endorse the name Patagona gigas for the Southern Giant Hummingbird and Patagona peruviana for the Northern Giant Hummingbird. We found that ~33% of specimens (74 of 226) in major museum collections that are labeled peruviana are actually misidentified gigas and we include this full list to correct the historical record. Finally, to facilitate identification and future study of these two cryptic species, we provide comprehensive information on plumage, measurements, and seasonal ranges.more » « less
-
A forcing function is an intervention for constraining human behavior. However, the literature describing forcing functions provides little guidance for when and how to apply forcing functions or their associated trade-offs. In this paper, we address these shortcomings by introducing a novel taxonomy of forcing functions. This taxonomy extends the previous methods in four ways. First, it identifies two levels of forcing function solidity: hard forcing functions, which explicitly enforce constraints through the system, and soft forcing functions, which convey or communicate constraints. Second, each solidity level is decomposed into specific types. Third, the taxonomy hierarchically ranks forcing function solidities and types based on trade-offs of constraint and resilience. Fourth, for hard forcing functions, our taxonomy offers formal guidance for identifying the minimally constraining intervention that will prevent a specific error from occurring. We validated the ability of our method to identify effective error interventions by applying it to systems with known errors from the literature. We then compared the solutions offered by our method to known, effective interventions. We discuss our results and offer suggestions for further developments in future research.more » « less
-
Implicit Requirements (IMR) identification is part of the Requirements Engineering (RE) phase in Software Engineering during which data is gathered to create SRS (Software Requirements Specifications) documents. As opposed to explicit requirements clearly stated, IMRs constitute subtle data and need to be inferred. Research has shown that IMRs are crucial to the success of software development. Many software systems can encounter failures due to lack of IMR data management. SRS documents are large, often hundreds of pages, due to which manually identifying IMRs by human software engineers is not feasible. Moreover, such data is evergrowing due to the expansion of software systems. It is thus important to address the crucial issue of IMR data management. This article presents a survey on IMRs in SRS documents with the definition and overview of IMR data, detailed taxonomy of IMRs with explanation and examples, practices in managing IMR data, and tools for IMR identification. In addition to reviewing classical and state-of-the-art approaches, we highlight trends and challenges and point out open issues for future research. This survey article is interesting based on data quality, hidden information retrieval, veracity and salience, and knowledge discovery from large textual documents with complex heterogeneous data.more » « less
-
Ho, Simon (Ed.)Abstract Whole-genome comparisons based on average nucleotide identities (ANI) and the genome-to-genome distance calculator have risen to prominence in rapidly classifying prokaryotic taxa using whole-genome sequences. Some implementations have even been proposed as a new standard in species classification and have become a common technique for papers describing newly sequenced genomes. However, attempts to apply whole-genome divergence data to the delineation of higher taxonomic units and to phylogenetic inference have had difficulty matching those produced by more complex phylogenetic methods. We present a novel method for generating statistically supported phylogenies of archaeal and bacterial groups using a combined ANI and alignment fraction-based metric. For the test cases to which we applied the developed approach, we obtained results comparable with other methodologies up to at least the family level. The developed method uses nonparametric bootstrapping to gauge support for inferred groups. This method offers the opportunity to make use of whole-genome comparison data, that is already being generated, to quickly produce phylogenies including support for inferred groups. Additionally, the developed ANI methodology can assist the classification of higher taxonomic groups.[Average nucleotide identity (ANI); genome evolution; prokaryotic species delineation; taxonomy.]more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.887310
