STEM Faculty Institute: An Intensive Interdisciplinary Effort to Improve STEM Faculty Adoption of Evidence-based Instructional Practices
- Award ID(s):
- 1712056
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10351631
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of college science teaching
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 0047-231X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 75-87
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
The Conference for Latinx Contingent Faculty Members convened a group of faculty members in STEM fields at Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) in the California State University System. The two-day event explored the often hidden, or unacknowledged realities of contingent faculty participants, with the purpose of gathering information about barriers and trade-offs these faculty experience professionally and personally that impact their work. This report provides an overview of barriers and challenges that were raised in the conference, and a brief review of the literature of strategies that could address these experiences, and better support Latinx contingent faculty in STEM.more » « less
-
As part of our Noyce Capacity Building grant, we examined how existing STEM course content is preparing students for the Missouri Content Assessment (MoCA) exam that is required for state certification. We also examined this through the lens of the recent curriculum designed on the state of Missouri model, which is Unified Science: Biology. Our most recent graduates in STEM Education exhibited difficulty in passing the MoCA exam in their specific STEM area of interest. Data from 2014-2018 showed that only half of our teacher candidates passed their STEM field MoCA exam on the first attempt. Some candidates took as many as four attempts to pass their exams while others were unable to achieve a passing score. In order to increase the number of teacher candidates as well as their success rates on the MoCA exam, we planned targeted revisions to our curriculum and coursework at Webster. One approach we used was to have content experts (faculty from Webster and our partner institution, St. Louis Community College) take the MoCA exams in their respective STEM disciplines. The qualitative survey results, coded using NVivo, and feedback from these experts allowed us to map learning outcomes and knowledge areas found on the exam to information on the MoCA website as well as our existing curriculum and course content. In this presentation, we will report the results of our survey, the impact this had on our curriculum redesign and articulation agreements, and our future strategies for our Track 1 application that were informed by the results of our capacity building activity. We also include use of study guides, practice tests and review sessions for MoCA exams to impact/improve pass rates of STEM Education majors on the content exam.more » « less
-
Miller, Eva (Ed.)COVID-19 is a continuing global pandemic causing significant changes and modifications in the ways we teach and learn here in the U.S as well as around the world. Most universities, faculty members, and students modified their learning system by incorporating significant online or mixed learning methods/modes to reduce in person contact time and to reduce the spread of the virus. Universities, faculty and students were challenged as they adapted to new learning modules, strategies and approaches. This adaption started in the Spring of 2020 and has continued to date through the Spring of 2022. The main objective of this project was to investigate faculty perception of STEM student experiences and behavior during the Fall 2020 semester as compared to the Spring 2020 semester as COVID-19 impacts were prolonged. Through a qualitative methodology of zoom interviews administered to 32 STEM faculty members across six U.S. Universities nationwide and a theming scheme, the opinion and narratives of these faculty members were garnered in a round one and round two sets of interviews, in Summer 2020 and then in Spring 2021 (following the semesters of interest). Some of the main new themes that were detected in faculty interviews during the Fall 2020 semester and which reflect faculty perceptions are represented as follow: COVID-19 impact on student and faculty motivation, COVID-19 impacts on labs and experiential learning, COVID-19 impact on mental health, COVID-19 impact on STEM students' involvement in STEM experiential learning opportunities and research. Other previous themes detected and which are revisited to analyze major differences with those themes obtained during the Spring 2020 are presented and not limited to: extra efforts from professors, student cheating behavior, cheating factors and prevention, student behavioral and performance changes, student struggles and challenges, University response and efforts to the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored the differences in these themes between the semesters to look at noticed adaptations and modifications. Presented will also be recommendations to improve student and faculty motivation along with strategies to enhance the student learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on common findings and suggest future strategies.more » « less
-
Miller, Eva (Ed.)The recent outbreak of COVID-19, considered as being a lethal pandemic by the World Health Organization, has caused profound changes in the educational system within the U.S and across the world. Overnight, universities and their educators had to switch to a largely online teaching format, which challenged their capacity to deliver learning content effectively to STEM students. Students were forced to adapt to a new learning environment in the midst of challenges in their own lives due to the COVID-19 effects on society and professional expectations. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate faculty perceptions of STEM student experiences during COVID-19. Through a qualitative methodology consisting of one-hour zoom interviews administered to 32 STEM faculty members from six U.S. Universities nationwide, faculty narratives regarding student and faculty experiences during COVID-19 were obtained. The qualitative research approach involved identifying common themes across faculty experiences and views in these narratives. Some of the categories of emerging themes associated with faculty perceptions on student and faculty experiences included: student struggles and challenges, student cheating and the online environment, faculty and student adaptability, faculty and student needs and support, and university resources and support. Best practices to facilitate online teaching and learning employed by STEM faculty were also discussed. Key findings revealed that students and faculty had both positive and negative experiences during COVID-19. Additionally, there was a greater need for consistent policies to improve the online student learning experiences. Recommendations to improve STEM student experiences include increased institutional resources and collaboration between faculty and the university administrators to provide a coherent online learning environment. Preliminary findings also provide insights to enhance institutional adaptability and resilience for improving STEM student experiences during future pandemics. Future research should continue to explore institutional adaptation strategies that enhance STEM student learning during pandemics.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- The DOI is not currently available.
