This study asks the question “to what extent do electronic election systems affect perceptions of election legitimacy in the U.S.?” The use of these systems is growing in the U.S. and abroad. Frequently, the justification for using electronic technology in election administration is that it reduces human-induced error – accidental error or intentional fraud – making elections cleaner and more credible. This study examines the effects on perceived election legitimacy of two electronic election technologies: electronic poll books and biometric voter identity verification. Poll books are record-keeping devices that allow election officials to determine which individuals are eligible to vote and where. Voters match their identity in the poll book to confirm they are eligible to vote. Electronic technology exists and is used for both poll books and voter identity verification. This pre-registered study tests these ideas in a pair of survey experiments conducted with samples of voting-age adults in the U.S. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            Towards a Robust Distributed Framework for Election-Day Voter Check-In
                        
                    
    
            Electronic poll books are computerized distributed systems that replace paper-based voter lists used to enable eligible voters to cast their ballots on the Election Day. These systems have the potential for speeding up voter check-in at the polling place, and making voter records more accurate by reducing human errors in dealing with printed voter lists and post-election transcription. At the same time, electronic poll books are non-trivial distributed computing systems, and ensuring correctness, security, integrity, fault-tolerance, and performance of such systems is a challenging problem. In fact we are not aware of a single commercially available system that does not contain major deficiencies and risk factors. This paper focuses on the distributed system aspects of electronic poll book solutions and identifies the obstacles that are inherent in any distributed system that must deal with failure and asynchrony while providing a consistent and dependable service. We review several requirements that need to be satisfied by electronic poll book systems, we discuss selected important results from distributed computing research that the commercial developers of electronic poll book systems appear to not be aware of. We then present a wider landscape, including social and political science aspects, we survey broader research issues, and discuss system implementation considerations. This paper brings for the first time to the attention of the research community an in-depth presentation of an important new problem of immediate relevance. Moreover, the electronic poll book technology is an attractive application domain for the research results in dependable and secure distributed computing. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 2131538
- PAR ID:
- 10351862
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems - 23rd International Symposium, SSS 2021
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 173-193
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Concerns over foreign and domestic interference have raised questions about the legitimacy of U.S. elections. While research has explored election administration and public views on electronic voting, little attention has been given to election administrators’ perspectives. This study addresses that gap by examining how Georgia election officials perceive the use of electronic pollbooks (e-pollbooks) for voter check-in. The research hypothesizes that administrators view e-pollbooks as enhancing democratic legitimacy and election security. To test this, the paper presents findings from an NSF-funded online survey conducted two months before the 2024 general election. The survey was distributed to all 159 Georgia county election administrators and received IRB approval. It asked respondents to evaluate the security, reliability, ease of use, and fairness of various voter check-in systems, along with broader characteristics of elections in their counties. The results offer insight into how those managing elections assess the tools that support electoral integrity.more » « less
- 
            Scarano, Stephen; Vasudevan, Vijayalakshmi; Samory, Mattia; Yang, Kai-Cheng; Yang, JungHwan; Grabowicz, Przemyslaw A (Ed.)Social media platforms allow users to create polls to gather public opinion on diverse topics. However, we know little about what such polls are used for and how reliable they are, especially in significant contexts like elections. Focusing on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S., this study shows that outcomes of election polls on Twitter deviate from election results despite their prevalence. Leveraging demographic inference and statistical analysis, we find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by male Republicans and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump in comparison to mainstream polls. We investigate potential sources of biased outcomes from the point of view of inauthentic, automated, and counter-normative behavior. Using social media experiments and interviews with poll authors, we identify inconsistencies between public vote counts and those privately visible to poll authors, with the gap potentially attributable to purchased votes. We find that election polls tend to be more biased, contain more questionable votes, and attract more bots before the election day than after. We highlight and compare key factors contributing to biased poll outcomes. Finally, we identify instances of polls spreading voter fraud conspiracy theories and estimate that a couple of thousand such polls were posted in 2020. The study discusses the implications of biased election polls in the context of transparency and accountability of social media platforms.more » « less
- 
            Upon encountering this publication, one might ask the obvious question, "Why do we need another deep learning and natural language processing book?" Several excellent ones have been published, covering both theoretical and practical aspects of deep learning and its application to language processing. However, from our experience teaching courses on natural language processing, we argue that, despite their excellent quality, most of these books do not target their most likely readers. The intended reader of this book is one who is skilled in a domain other than machine learning and natural language processing and whose work relies, at least partially, on the automated analysis of large amounts of data, especially textual data. Such experts may include social scientists, political scientists, biomedical scientists, and even computer scientists and computational linguists with limited exposure to machine learning. Existing deep learning and natural language processing books generally fall into two camps. The first camp focuses on the theoretical foundations of deep learning. This is certainly useful to the aforementioned readers, as one should understand the theoretical aspects of a tool before using it. However, these books tend to assume the typical background of a machine learning researcher and, as a consequence, I have often seen students who do not have this background rapidly get lost in such material. To mitigate this issue, the second type of book that exists today focuses on the machine learning practitioner; that is, on how to use deep learning software, with minimal attention paid to the theoretical aspects. We argue that focusing on practical aspects is similarly necessary but not sufficient. Considering that deep learning frameworks and libraries have gotten fairly complex, the chance of misusing them due to theoretical misunderstandings is high. We have commonly seen this problem in our courses, too. This book, therefore, aims to bridge the theoretical and practical aspects of deep learning for natural language processing. We cover the necessary theoretical background and assume minimal machine learning background from the reader. Our aim is that anyone who took introductory linear algebra and calculus courses will be able to follow the theoretical material. To address practical aspects, this book includes pseudo code for the simpler algorithms discussed and actual Python code for the more complicated architectures. The code should be understandable by anyone who has taken a Python programming course. After reading this book, we expect that the reader will have the necessary foundation to immediately begin building real-world, practical natural language processing systems, and to expand their knowledge by reading research publications on these topics. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009026222more » « less
- 
            Integrity of elections is vital to democratic systems, but it is frequently threatened by malicious actors. The study of algorithmic complexity of the problem of manipulating election outcomes by changing its structural features is known as election control. One means of election control that has been proposed is to select a subset of issues that determine voter preferences over candidates. We study a variation of this model in which voters have judgments about relative importance of issues, and a malicious actor can manipulate these judgments. We show that computing effective manipulations in this model is NP-hard even with two candidates or binary issues. However, we demonstrate that the problem is tractable with a constant number of voters or issues. Additionally, while it remains intractable when voters can vote stochastically, we exhibit an important special case in which stochastic voting enables tractable manipulation.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    