skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: Promoter Architecture Differences among Alphaproteobacteria and Other Bacterial Taxa
ABSTRACT Much of our knowledge of bacterial transcription initiation has been derived from studying the promoters of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis . Given the expansive diversity across the bacterial phylogeny, it is unclear how much of this knowledge can be applied to other organisms. Here, we report on bioinformatic analyses of promoter sequences of the primary σ factor (σ 70 ) by leveraging publicly available transcription start site (TSS) sequencing data sets for nine bacterial species spanning five phyla. This analysis identifies previously unreported differences in the −35 and −10 elements of σ 70 -dependent promoters in several groups of bacteria. We found that Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria σ 70 -dependent promoters lack the TTG triad in their −35 element, which is predicted to be conserved across the bacterial phyla. In addition, the majority of the Alphaproteobacteria σ 70 -dependent promoters analyzed lacked the thymine at position −7 that is highly conserved in other phyla. Bioinformatic examination of the Alphaproteobacteria σ 70 -dependent promoters identifies a significant overrepresentation of essential genes and ones encoding proteins with common cellular functions downstream of promoters containing an A, C, or G at position −7. We propose that transcription of many σ 70 -dependent promoters in Alphaproteobacteria depends on the transcription factor CarD, which is an essential protein in several members of this phylum. Our analysis expands the knowledge of promoter architecture across the bacterial phylogeny and provides new information that can be used to engineer bacteria for use in medical, environmental, agricultural, and biotechnological processes. IMPORTANCE Transcription of DNA to RNA by RNA polymerase is essential for cells to grow, develop, and respond to stress. Understanding the process and control of transcription is important for health, disease, the environment, and biotechnology. Decades of research on a few bacteria have identified promoter DNA sequences that are recognized by the σ subunit of RNA polymerase. We used bioinformatic analyses to reveal previously unreported differences in promoter DNA sequences across the bacterial phylogeny. We found that many Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria promoters lack a sequence in their −35 DNA recognition element that was previously assumed to be conserved and that Alphaproteobacteria lack a thymine residue at position −7, also previously assumed to be conserved. Our work reports important new information about bacterial transcription, illustrates the benefits of studying bacteria across the phylogenetic tree, and proposes new lines of future investigation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1803055
NSF-PAR ID:
10354042
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Editor(s):
Faust, Karoline
Date Published:
Journal Name:
mSystems
Volume:
6
Issue:
4
ISSN:
2379-5077
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ( , Nature Communications)
    Abstract

    Transcription rates are regulated by the interactions between RNA polymerase, sigma factor, and promoter DNA sequences in bacteria. However, it remains unclear how non-canonical sequence motifs collectively control transcription rates. Here, we combine massively parallel assays, biophysics, and machine learning to develop a 346-parameter model that predicts site-specific transcription initiation rates for any σ70promoter sequence, validated across 22132 bacterial promoters with diverse sequences. We apply the model to predict genetic context effects, design σ70promoters with desired transcription rates, and identify undesired promoters inside engineered genetic systems. The model provides a biophysical basis for understanding gene regulation in natural genetic systems and precise transcriptional control for engineering synthetic genetic systems.

     
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ( , Molecular Microbiology)
    Abstract

    The Spo0A transcription factor is activated by phosphorylation in starvingBacillus subtiliscells. The activated Spo0A (Spo0A~P) regulates genes controlling entry into sporulation and appears to control mother‐cell‐specific gene expression after asymmetric division, but the latter remains elusive. Here, we found that Spo0A~P directly binds to three conserved DNA sequences (0A1‐3) in the promoter region of the mother cell‐specific lytic transglycosylase genespoIID, which is transcribed by σE‐RNA polymerase (RNAP) and negatively controlled by the SpoIIID transcription factor and required for forespore engulfment. Systematic mutagenesis of the 0A boxes revealed that the 0A1 and 0A2 boxes located upstream of the promoter positively control the transcription ofspoIID. In contrast, the 0A3 box located downstream of the promoter negatively controls the transcription ofspoIID. The mutated SpoIIID binding site located between the −35 and −10 promoter elements causes increased expression ofspoIIDand reduced sporulation. When the mutations of 0A1, 0A2, and IIID sites are combined, sporulation is restored. Collectively, our data suggest that the mother cell‐specificspoIIDexpression is precisely controlled by the coordination of three factors, Spo0A~P, SpoIIID, and σE‐RNAP, for proper sporulation. The conservation of this mechanism across spore‐forming species was discussed.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ( , PLOS Genetics)
    Crosson, Sean (Ed.)
    Quorum sensing is a chemical communication process that bacteria use to coordinate group behaviors. In the global pathogen Vibrio cholerae , one quorum-sensing receptor and transcription factor, called VqmA (VqmA Vc ), activates expression of the vqmR gene encoding the small regulatory RNA VqmR, which represses genes involved in virulence and biofilm formation. Vibriophage VP882 encodes a VqmA homolog called VqmA Phage that activates transcription of the phage gene qtip , and Qtip launches the phage lytic program. Curiously, VqmA Phage can activate vqmR expression but VqmA Vc cannot activate expression of qtip . Here, we investigate the mechanism underlying this asymmetry. We find that promoter selectivity is driven by each VqmA DNA-binding domain and key DNA sequences in the vqmR and qtip promoters are required to maintain specificity. A protein sequence-guided mutagenesis approach revealed that the residue E194 of VqmA Phage and A192, the equivalent residue in VqmA Vc , in the helix-turn-helix motifs contribute to promoter-binding specificity. A genetic screen to identify VqmA Phage mutants that are incapable of binding the qtip promoter but maintain binding to the vqmR promoter delivered additional VqmA Phage residues located immediately C-terminal to the helix-turn-helix motif as required for binding the qtip promoter. Surprisingly, these residues are conserved between VqmA Phage and VqmA Vc . A second, targeted genetic screen revealed a region located in the VqmA Vc DNA-binding domain that is necessary to prevent VqmA Vc from binding the qtip promoter, thus restricting DNA binding to the vqmR promoter. We propose that the VqmA Vc helix-turn-helix motif and the C-terminal flanking residues function together to prohibit VqmA Vc from binding the qtip promoter. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ( , Journal of Bacteriology)
    null (Ed.)
    Bacterial cells alter gene expression in response to changes in population density in a process called quorum sensing (QS). In Vibrio harveyi, LuxO, a low cell density activator of sigma factor-54 (RpoN), is required for transcription of five non-coding regulatory sRNAs, Qrr1-Qrr5, which each repress translation of the master QS regulator LuxR. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the leading cause of bacterial seafood-borne gastroenteritis, also contains five Qrr sRNAs that control OpaR (the LuxR homolog), controlling capsule polysaccharide (CPS), motility, and metabolism. We show that in a Δ luxO deletion mutant, opaR was de-repressed and CPS and biofilm were produced. However, in a Δ rpoN mutant, opaR was repressed, no CPS was produced, and less biofilm production was observed compared to wild type. To determine why opaR was repressed, expression analysis in Δ luxO showed all five qrr genes were repressed, while in Δ rpoN the qrr2 gene was significantly de-repressed. Reporter assays and mutant analysis showed Qrr2 sRNA can act alone to control OpaR. Bioinformatics analysis identified a sigma-70 (RpoD) -35 -10 promoter overlapping the canonical sigma-54 (RpoN) -24 -12 promoter in the qrr2 regulatory region. The qrr2 sigma-70 promoter element was also present in additional Vibrio species indicating it is widespread. Mutagenesis of the sigma-70 -10 promoter site in the Δ rpoN mutant background, resulted in repression of qrr2. Analysis of qrr quadruple deletion mutants, in which only a single qrr gene is present, showed that only Qrr2 sRNA can act independently to regulate opaR . Mutant and expression data also demonstrated that RpoN and the global regulator, Fis, act additively to repress qrr2 . Our data has uncovered a new mechanism of qrr expression and shows that Qrr2 sRNA is sufficient for OpaR regulation. Importance The quorum sensing non-coding sRNAs are present in all Vibrio species but vary in number and regulatory roles among species. In the Harveyi clade, all species contain five qrr genes, and in V. harveyi these are transcribed by sigma-54 and are additive in function. In the Cholerae clade, four qrr genes are present, and in V. cholerae the qrr genes are redundant in function. In V. parahaemolyticus , qrr2 is controlled by two overlapping promoters. In an rpoN mutant, qrr2 is transcribed from a sigma-70 promoter that is present in all V. parahaemolyticus strains and in other species of the Harveyi clade suggesting a conserved mechanism of regulation. Qrr2 sRNA can function as the sole Qrr sRNA to control OpaR. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Plant Direct)
    Abstract

    ARGONAUTES are the central effector proteins ofRNAsilencing which bind target transcripts in a smallRNA‐guided manner.Arabidopsis thalianahas 10ARGONAUTE(AGO) genes, with specialized roles inRNA‐directedDNAmethylation, post‐transcriptional gene silencing, and antiviral defense. To better understand specialization amongAGOgenes at the level of transcriptional regulation we tested a library of 1497 transcription factors for binding to the promoters ofAGO1,AGO10, andAGO7using yeast 1‐hybrid assays. A ranked list of candidateDNA‐bindingTFs revealed binding of theAGO7promoter by a number of proteins in two families: the miR156‐regulatedSPLfamily and the miR319‐regulatedTCPfamily, both of which have roles in developmental timing and leaf morphology. Possible functions forSPLandTCPbinding are unclear: we showed that these binding sites are not required for the polar expression pattern ofAGO7, nor for the function ofAGO7in leaf shape. NormalAGO7transcription levels and function appear to depend instead on an adjacent 124‐bp region. Progress in understanding the structure of this promoter may aid efforts to understand how the conservedAGO7‐triggeredTAS3pathway functions in timing and polarity.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email