More Like this

1. SN 2020qlb: A hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with well-characterized light curve undulations

   https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244086  

   West, S. L.; Lunnan, R.; Omand, C. M.; Kangas, T.; Schulze, S.; Strotjohann, N. L.; Yang, S.; Fransson, C.; Sollerman, J.; Perley, D.; et al (February 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics)

   Context. SN 2020qlb (ZTF20abobpcb) is a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) that is among the most luminous (maximum M g  = −22.25 mag) and that has one of the longest rise times (77 days from explosion to maximum). We estimate the total radiated energy to be > 2.1 × 10 51 erg. SN 2020qlb has a well-sampled light curve that exhibits clear near and post peak undulations, a phenomenon seen in other SLSNe, whose physical origin is still unknown. Aims. We discuss the potential power source of this immense explosion as well as the mechanisms behind its observed light curve undulations. Methods. We analyze photospheric spectra and compare them to other SLSNe-I. We constructed the bolometric light curve using photometry from a large data set of observations from the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), Liverpool Telescope (LT), and Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory and compare it with radioactive, circumstellar interaction and magnetar models. Model residuals and light curve polynomial fit residuals are analyzed to estimate the undulation timescale and amplitude. We also determine host galaxy properties based on imaging and spectroscopy data, including a detection of the [O III] λ 4363, auroral line, allowing for a direct metallicity measurement. Results. We rule out the Arnett 56 Ni decay model for SN 2020qlb’s light curve due to unphysical parameter results. Our most favored power source is the magnetic dipole spin-down energy deposition of a magnetar. Two to three near peak oscillations, intriguingly similar to those of SN 2015bn, were found in the magnetar model residuals with a timescale of 32 ± 6 days and an amplitude of 6% of peak luminosity. We rule out centrally located undulation sources due to timescale considerations; and we favor the result of ejecta interactions with circumstellar material (CSM) density fluctuations as the source of the undulations. 

   more » « less
2. High-Cadence TESS and Ground-based Data of SN 2019esa, the Less Energetic Sibling of SN 2006gy ^∗

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ea7  

   Andrews, Jennifer E.; Pearson, Jeniveve; Lundquist, M. J.; Sand, David J.; Jencson, Jacob E.; Bostroem, K. Azalee; Hosseinzadeh, Griffin; Valenti, S.; Smith, Nathan; Amaro, R. C.; et al (October 2022, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the nearby ( D ≈ 28 Mpc) interacting supernova (SN) 2019esa, discovered within hours of explosion and serendipitously observed by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). Early, high-cadence light curves from both TESS and the DLT40 survey tightly constrain the time of explosion, and show a 30 day rise to maximum light followed by a near-constant linear decline in luminosity. Optical spectroscopy over the first 40 days revealed a reddened object with narrow Balmer emission lines seen in Type IIn SNe. The slow rise to maximum in the optical light curve combined with the lack of broad H α emission suggest the presence of very optically thick and close circumstellar material (CSM) that quickly decelerated the SN ejecta. This CSM was likely created from a massive star progenitor with an M ̇ ∼ 0.2 M ☉ yr −1 lost in a previous eruptive episode 3–4 yr before eruption, similar to giant eruptions of luminous blue variable stars. At late times, strong intermediate-width Ca ii , Fe i , and Fe ii lines are seen in the optical spectra, identical to those seen in the superluminous interacting SN 2006gy. The strong CSM interaction masks the underlying explosion mechanism in SN 2019esa, but the combination of the luminosity, strength of the H α lines, and mass-loss rate of the progenitor seem to be inconsistent with a Type Ia CSM model and instead point to a core-collapse origin. 

   more » « less
3. The Diverse Properties of Type Icn Supernovae Point to Multiple Progenitor Channels

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ff6  

   Pellegrino, C.; Howell, D. A.; Terreran, G.; Arcavi, I.; Bostroem, K. A.; Brown, P. J.; Burke, J.; Dong, Y.; Gilkis, A.; Hiramatsu, D.; et al (October 2022, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract We present a sample of Type Icn supernovae (SNe Icn), a newly discovered class of transients characterized by their interaction with H- and He-poor circumstellar material (CSM). This sample is the largest collection of SNe Icn to date and includes observations of two published objects (SN 2019hgp and SN 2021csp) and two objects not yet published in the literature (SN 2019jc and SN 2021ckj). The SNe Icn display a range of peak luminosities, rise times, and decline rates, as well as diverse late-time spectral features. To investigate their explosion and progenitor properties, we fit their bolometric light curves to a semianalytical model consisting of luminosity inputs from circumstellar interaction and radioactive decay of 56 Ni. We infer low ejecta masses (≲2 M ⊙ ) and 56 Ni masses (≲0.04 M ⊙ ) from the light curves, suggesting that normal stripped-envelope supernova (SESN) explosions within a dense CSM cannot be the underlying mechanism powering SNe Icn. Additionally, we find that an estimate of the star formation rate density at the location of SN 2019jc lies at the lower end of a distribution of SESNe, in conflict with a massive star progenitor of this object. Based on its estimated ejecta mass, 56 Ni mass, and explosion site properties, we suggest a low-mass, ultra-stripped star as the progenitor of SN 2019jc. For other SNe Icn, we suggest that a Wolf–Rayet star progenitor may better explain their observed properties. This study demonstrates that multiple progenitor channels may produce SNe Icn and other interaction-powered transients. 

   more » « less
4. SN 2022jli: A Type Ic Supernova with Periodic Modulation of Its Light Curve and an Unusually Long Rise

   https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acfc25  

   Moore, T; Smartt, S J; Nicholl, M; Srivastav, S; Stevance, H F; Jess, D B; Grant, S_D T; Fulton, M D; Rhodes, L; Sim, S A; et al (October 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters)

   Abstract We present multiwavelength photometry and spectroscopy of SN 2022jli, an unprecedented Type Ic supernova discovered in the galaxy NGC 157 at a distance of ≈ 23 Mpc. The multiband light curves reveal many remarkable characteristics. Peaking at a magnitude ofg= 15.11 ± 0.02, the high-cadence photometry reveals periodic undulations of 12.5 ± 0.2 days superimposed on the 200-day supernova decline. This periodicity is observed in the light curves from nine separate filter and instrument configurations with peak-to-peak amplitudes of ≃ 0.1 mag. This is the first time that repeated periodic oscillations, over many cycles, have been detected in a supernova light curve. SN 2022jli also displays an extreme early excess that fades over ≈25 days, followed by a rise to a peak luminosity ofL_opt= 10^42.1erg s⁻¹. Although the exact explosion epoch is not constrained by data, the time from explosion to maximum light is ≳ 59 days. The luminosity can be explained by a large ejecta mass (M_ej≈ 12 ± 6M_⊙) powered by⁵⁶Ni, but we find it difficult to quantitatively model the early excess with circumstellar interaction and cooling. Collision between the supernova ejecta and a binary companion is a possible source of this emission. We discuss the origin of the periodic variability in the light curve, including interaction of the SN ejecta with nested shells of circumstellar matter and neutron stars colliding with binary companions. 

   more » « less
5. SN 2017gci: a nearby Type I Superluminous Supernova with a bumpy tail

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa4035  

   Fiore, A; Chen, T-W; Jerkstrand, A; Benetti, S; Ciolfi, R; Inserra, C; Cappellaro, E; Pastorello, A; Leloudas, G; Schulze, S; et al (February 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   null (Ed.)

   ABSTRACT We present and discuss the optical spectrophotometric observations of the nearby (z = 0.087) Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN I) SN 2017gci, whose peak K-corrected absolute magnitude reaches Mg = −21.5 mag. Its photometric and spectroscopic evolution includes features of both slow- and of fast-evolving SLSN I, thus favoring a continuum distribution between the two SLSN-I subclasses. In particular, similarly to other SLSNe I, the multiband light curves (LCs) of SN 2017gci show two re-brightenings at about 103 and 142 d after the maximum light. Interestingly, this broadly agrees with a broad emission feature emerging around 6520 Å after ∼51 d from the maximum light, which is followed by a sharp knee in the LC. If we interpret this feature as Hα, this could support the fact that the bumps are the signature of late interactions of the ejecta with a (hydrogen-rich) circumstellar material. Then we fitted magnetar- and CSM-interaction-powered synthetic LCs on to the bolometric one of SN 2017gci. In the magnetar case, the fit suggests a polar magnetic field Bp ≃ 6 × 1014 G, an initial period of the magnetar Pinitial ≃ 2.8 ms, an ejecta mass $$M_{\rm ejecta}\simeq 9\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$ and an ejecta opacity $$\kappa \simeq 0.08\, \mathrm{cm}^{2}\, \rm{g}^{-1}$$. A CSM-interaction scenario would imply a CSM mass $$\simeq 5\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$ and an ejecta mass $$\simeq 12\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$. Finally, the nebular spectrum of phase  + 187 d was modeled, deriving a mass of $$\sim 10\, {\rm M}_\odot$$ for the ejecta. Our models suggest that either a magnetar or CSM interaction might be the power sources for SN 2017gci and that its progenitor was a massive ($$40\, {\rm M}_\odot$$) star. 

   more » « less