More Like this

1. Representation in science and trust in scientists in the USA

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02358-4  

   Druckman, James N; Ognyanova, Katherine; Safarpour, Alauna; Schulman, Jonathan; Lunz_Trujillo, Kristin; Uslu, Ata Aydin; Green, Jon; Baum, Matthew A; Quintana-Mathé, Alexi; Qu, Hong; et al (March 2026, Nature Human Behaviour)
2. Intersectionality in HCI: lost in translation

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3416498  

   Rankin, Yolanda A.; Thomas, Jakita O.; Joseph, Nicole M. (September 2020, Interactions)

   null (Ed.)
3. In Defense of Merit in Science

   https://doi.org/10.35995/jci03010001  

   Abbot, D.; Bikfalvi, A.; Bleske-Rechek, A.L.; Bodmer, W.; Boghossian, P.; Carvalho, C.M.; Ciccolini, J.; Coyne, J.A.; Gauss, J.; Gill, P.M.W.; et al (April 2023, Journal of Controversial Ideas)

   Merit is a central pillar of liberal epistemology, humanism, and democracy. The scientific enterprise, built on merit, has proven effective in generating scientific and technological advances, reducing suffering, narrowing social gaps, and improving the quality of life globally. This perspective documents the ongoing attempts to undermine the core principles of liberal epistemology and to replace merit with non-scientific, politically motivated criteria. We explain the philosophical origins of this conflict, document the intrusion of ideology into our scientific institutions, discuss the perils of abandoning merit, and offer an alternative, human-centered approach to address existing social inequalities. 

   more » « less
4. Antidispersion in Flows in Leaky Channels

   https://doi.org/10.1103/yt8f-xj4j  

   Gan, Yiming; Guo, Yisen; Thomas, John H; Boster, Kimberly A; Shang, Jessica K; Kelley, Douglas H (November 2025, Physical Review Letters)
5. Transparency in Practice in Qualitative Research

   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000955  

   Kapiszewski, Diana; Karcher, Sebastian (April 2021, PS: Political Science & Politics)

   null (Ed.)