An official website of the United States government
Dynamic variables of drop impact such as force, drag, pressure, and stress distributions are key to understanding a wide range of natural and industrial processes. While the study of drop impact kinematics has been in constant progress for decades thanks to high-speed photography and computational fluid dynamics, research on drop impact dynamics has only peaked in the last 10 years. Here, we review how recent coordinated efforts of experiments, simulations, and theories have led to new insights on drop impact dynamics. Particularly, we consider the temporal evolution of the impact force in the early- and late-impact regimes, as well as spatiotemporal features of the pressure and shear-stress distributions on solid surfaces. We also discuss other factors, including the presence of water layers, air cushioning, and nonspherical drop geometry, and briefly review granular impact cratering by liquid drops as an example demonstrating the distinct consequences of the stress distributions of drop impact.
more »
« less
Stress distribution and surface shock wave of drop impact
Abstract Drop impact causes severe surface erosion, dictating many important natural, environmental and engineering processes and calling for substantial prevention and preservation efforts. Nevertheless, despite extensive studies on the kinematic features of impacting drops over the last two decades, the dynamic process that leads to the drop-impact erosion is still far from clear. Here, we develop a method of high-speed stress microscopy, which measures the key dynamic properties of drop impact responsible for erosion, i.e., the shear stress and pressure distributions of impacting drops, with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolutions. Our experiments reveal the fast propagation of self-similar noncentral stress maxima underneath impacting drops and quantify the shear force on impacted substrates. Moreover, we examine the deformation of elastic substrates under impact and uncover impact-induced surface shock waves. Our study opens the door for quantitative measurements of the impact stress of liquid drops and sheds light on the origin of low-speed drop-impact erosion.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10364675
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Communications
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2041-1723
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Impacting drops are ubiquitous and the corresponding impact force is their most studied dynamic quantity. However, impact forces arising from collisions with curved surfaces are understudied. In this study, we impact small cups with falling drops across drop Reynolds number 2975–12 800, isolating five dominant parameters influencing impact force: drop height and diameter, surface curvature and wettability, and impact eccentricity. These parameters are effectively continuous in their domain and have stochastic variability. The unpredictable dynamics of the system incentivize the implementation of tools that can unearth relationships between parameters and make predictions about impact force for parameter values for which there is not explicit experimental data. We predict force due to the impacting drop in a concave target using an ensemble learning algorithm comprised of four base algorithms: a random forest regressor, k-nearest neighbor, a gradient boosting regressor, and a multi-layer perceptron. We train and test our algorithm with original experimental data comprising 387 total trials using four cup radii with two wetting conditions each. Our approach permits the determination of relative importance of the input features in producing impact force and force predictions which can be compared to scaling relations modified from those for flat targets. Algorithmic predictions indicate that deformation of the drop and surface wettability, often neglected in scaling for impact force on flat surfaces, are important for concave targets. Finally, our approach provides another opportunity for the application of machine learning to characterize complex systems' fluid mechanics for which experimental variables are numerous and vary independently.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT We present initial findings from the ongoing Community Stress Drop Validation Study to compare spectral stress-drop estimates for earthquakes in the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, sequence. This study uses a unified dataset to independently estimate earthquake source parameters through various methods. Stress drop, which denotes the change in average shear stress along a fault during earthquake rupture, is a critical parameter in earthquake science, impacting ground motion, rupture simulation, and source physics. Spectral stress drop is commonly derived by fitting the amplitude-spectrum shape, but estimates can vary substantially across studies for individual earthquakes. Sponsored jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Statewide (previously, Southern) California Earthquake Center our community study aims to elucidate sources of variability and uncertainty in earthquake spectral stress-drop estimates through quantitative comparison of submitted results from independent analyses. The dataset includes nearly 13,000 earthquakes ranging from M 1 to 7 during a two-week period of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence, recorded within a 1° radius. In this article, we report on 56 unique submissions received from 20 different groups, detailing spectral corner frequencies (or source durations), moment magnitudes, and estimated spectral stress drops. Methods employed encompass spectral ratio analysis, spectral decomposition and inversion, finite-fault modeling, ground-motion-based approaches, and combined methods. Initial analysis reveals significant scatter across submitted spectral stress drops spanning over six orders of magnitude. However, we can identify between-method trends and offsets within the data to mitigate this variability. Averaging submissions for a prioritized subset of 56 events shows reduced variability of spectral stress drop, indicating overall consistency in recovered spectral stress-drop values.more » « less
-
Abstract We analyze source characteristics of global, deep‐focus (>350 km) earthquakes with moment magnitudes (Mw) larger than 6.0–8.2 using teleseismic P‐wave and S‐wave spectra and an empirical Green's functions approach. We estimate the corner frequency assuming Brune's source model and calculate stress drops assuming a circular crack model. Based on P‐wave and S‐wave spectra, the one standard deviation ranges are 3.5–369.8 and 8.2–328.9 MPa, respectively. Based on the P‐wave analysis, the median of our stress drop estimates is about a factor of 10 higher than the median stress drop of shallow earthquakes with the same magnitude estimated by Allmann and Shearer (2009,https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005821). This suggests that, on average, the shear stress of deep faults in the mantle transition zone is an order of magnitude higher than the shear stress of faults in the crust. The wide range of stress drops implies coexistence of multiple physical mechanisms.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT The circular-crack model has been widely used in seismology to infer earthquake stress drop. A common assumption is that the background medium is isotropic, although many earthquakes occur in geologically anisotropic settings. In this article, we study the effect of anisotropy on stress drop for a circular crack model and present explicit formalism in both static and kinematic cases. In the static case, we obtain the relationship between stress drop and slip for a circular crack model in an arbitrarily anisotropic medium. Special attention is given to the transversely isotropic (TI) medium. The static formalism is useful in understanding stress drop, but not all quantities are observables. Therefore, we resort to the kinematic case, from which we can infer stress drop using recorded far-field body waves. In the kinematic case, we assume that the crack ruptures circularly and reaches the final displacement determined by the static solutions. The far-field waveforms show that the corner frequency will change with different anisotropic parameters. Finally, we calculate the stress drops for cracks in isotropic and anisotropic media using the far-field waveforms. We find that in an isotropic medium, only shear stress acting on the crack surface contributes to shear slip. However, in a TI medium, if the anisotropy symmetry axis is not perpendicular or parallel to the crack surface, a normal stress (normal to the crack surface) can produce a shear slip. In calculating stress drop for an earthquake in an anisotropic medium using far-field body waves, a large error may be introduced if we ignore the possible anisotropy in the inversion. For a TI medium with about 18% anisotropy, the misfit of inferred stress drop could be up to 41%. Considering the anisotropic information, we can further improve the accuracy of stress-drop inversion.more » « less
