skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: A Comparison of Exhaustive and Non-lattice-based Methods for Auditing Hierarchical Relations in Gene Ontology
Uncovering and fixing errors in biomedical terminologies is essential so that they provide accurate knowledge to downstream applications that rely on them. Non-lattice-based methods have been applied to identify various kinds of inconsistencies in different biomedical terminologies. In previous work, we have introduced two inference-based approaches that were applied in an exhaustive manner to audit hierarchical relations in the Gene Ontology: (1) Lexical-based inference framework, and (2) Subsumption-based sub-term inference framework. However, it is unclear how effective these exhaustive approaches perform compared with their corresponding non-lattice-based approaches. Therefore, in this paper, we implement the non-lattice versions of these two exhaustive approaches, and perform a comprehensive comparison between non-lattice-based and exhaustive approaches to audit the Gene Ontology. The domain expert evaluations performed for the two exhaustive approaches are leveraged to evaluate the non-lattice versions. The results indicate that the non-lattice versions have increased precision than their exhaustive counterparts even though they do not capture some of the potential inconsistencies that the exhaustive approaches identify.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1931134
PAR ID:
10367859
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
AMIA 2021 Annual Symposium
Page Range / eLocation ID:
177-186
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings)
    Non-Lattice Subgraphs (NLSs) are graph fragments of a terminology which violates the lattice property, a desirable property for a well-formed terminology. They have been proven to be useful in identifying inconsistencies in biomedical terminologies. Similar NLSs may denote similar inconsistencies that may suggest possibly similar remediations. Therefore, we investigate a structural-semantic-based approach to identify similar NLSs in the Gene Ontology (GO). For an input NLS, we first obtain all its isomorphic NLSs. Then, we compare each concept of the input NLS with the corresponding concept in an isomorphic NLS and then compute a similarity score for the two NLSs. Applying this approach to 10 different structures of NLSs in GO, we found that 38.43% (910/2368) of NLSs have at least one similar NLS. We also observed some interesting lexical patterns frequently existing in similar NLSs. Our approach may be applicable to other biomedical terminologies for identifying similar NLSs. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM))
    Missing hierarchical is-a relations and missing concepts are common quality issues in biomedical ontologies. Non-lattice subgraphs have been extensively studied for automatically identifying missing is-a relations in biomedical ontologies like SNOMED CT. However, little is known about non-lattice subgraphs’ capability to uncover new or missing concepts in biomedical ontologies. In this work, we investigate a lexical-based intersection approach based on non-lattice subgraphs to identify potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT. We first construct lexical features of concepts using their fully specified names. Then we generate hierarchically unrelated concept pairs in non-lattice subgraphs as the candidates to derive new concepts. For each candidate pair of concepts, we conduct an order-preserving intersection based on the two concepts’ lexical features, with the intersection result serving as the potential new concept name suggested. We further perform automatic validation through terminologies in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and literature in PubMed. Applying this approach to the March 2021 release of SNOMED CT US Edition, we obtained 7,702 potential missing concepts, among which 1,288 were validated through UMLS and 1,309 were validated through PubMed. The results showed that non-lattice subgraphs have the potential to facilitate suggestion of new concepts for SNOMED CT. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract Objective The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) integrates various source terminologies to support interoperability between biomedical information systems. In this article, we introduce a novel transformation-based auditing method that leverages the UMLS knowledge to systematically identify missing hierarchical IS-A relations in the source terminologies. Materials and Methods Given a concept name in the UMLS, we first identify its base and secondary noun chunks. For each identified noun chunk, we generate replacement candidates that are more general than the noun chunk. Then, we replace the noun chunks with their replacement candidates to generate new potential concept names that may serve as supertypes of the original concept. If a newly generated name is an existing concept name in the same source terminology with the original concept, then a potentially missing IS-A relation between the original and the new concept is identified. Results Applying our transformation-based method to English-language concept names in the UMLS (2019AB release), a total of 39 359 potentially missing IS-A relations were detected in 13 source terminologies. Domain experts evaluated a random sample of 200 potentially missing IS-A relations identified in the SNOMED CT (U.S. edition) and 100 in Gene Ontology. A total of 173 of 200 and 63 of 100 potentially missing IS-A relations were confirmed by domain experts, indicating that our method achieved a precision of 86.5% and 63% for the SNOMED CT and Gene Ontology, respectively. Conclusions Our results showed that our transformation-based method is effective in identifying missing IS-A relations in the UMLS source terminologies. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Biomedical Semantics)
    Abstract Biomedical terminologies play a vital role in managing biomedical data. Missing IS-A relations in a biomedical terminology could be detrimental to its downstream usages. In this paper, we investigate an approach combining logical definitions and lexical features to discover missing IS-A relations in two biomedical terminologies: SNOMED CT and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) thesaurus. The method is applied to unrelated concept-pairs within non-lattice subgraphs: graph fragments within a terminology likely to contain various inconsistencies. Our approach first compares whether the logical definition of a concept is more general than  that of the other concept. Then, we check whether the lexical features of the concept are contained in those of the other concept. If both constraints are satisfied, we suggest a potentially missing IS-A relation between the two concepts. The method identified 982 potential missing IS-A relations for SNOMED CT and 100 for NCI thesaurus. In order to assess the efficacy of our approach, a random sample of results belonging to the “Clinical Findings” and “Procedure” subhierarchies of SNOMED CT and results belonging to the “Drug, Food, Chemical or Biomedical Material” subhierarchy of the NCI thesaurus were evaluated by domain experts. The evaluation results revealed that 118 out of 150 suggestions are valid for SNOMED CT and 17 out of 20 are valid for NCI thesaurus. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM))
    null (Ed.)
    Biomedical terminologies have been increasingly used in modern biomedical research and applications to facilitate data management and ensure semantic interoperability. As part of the evolution process, new concepts are regularly added to biomedical terminologies in response to the evolving domain knowledge and emerging applications. Most existing concept enrichment methods suggest new concepts via directly importing knowledge from external sources. In this paper, we introduced a lexical method based on formal concept analysis (FCA) to identify potentially missing concepts in a given terminology by leveraging its intrinsic knowledge - concept names. We first construct the FCA formal context based on the lexical features of concepts. Then we perform multistage intersection to formalize new concepts and detect potentially missing concepts. We applied our method to the Disease or Disorder sub-hierarchy in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Thesaurus (19.08d version) and identified a total of 8,983 potentially missing concepts. As a preliminary evaluation of our method to validate the potentially missing concepts, we further checked whether they were included in any external source terminology in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). The result showed that 592 out of 8,937 potentially missing concepts were found in the UMLS. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email