More Like this

1. ${}^{28}\mathrm{Si}(p,t){}^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ data reconsidered for the astrophysical ${}^{25}\mathrm{Al}(p,\gamma ){}^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ rate

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.035804  

   Bardayan, D. W. (September 2023, Physical Review C)
2. Optical model potentials for deuteron scattering off ${}^{24}\mathrm{Mg},$ ${}^{28}\mathrm{Si},$ ${}^{58}\mathrm{Ni},$ ${}^{90}\mathrm{Zr},$ ${}^{116}\mathrm{Sn},$ and ${}^{208}\mathrm{Pb}$ at $\approx 100 \mathrm{MeV}\text{/}\text{nucleon}$

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044314  

   Patel, D.; Cuong, D_C; Howard, K_B; Garg, U.; Khoa, Dao_T; Akimune, H.; Berg, G_P_A; Fujiwara, M.; Harakeh, M_N; Itoh, M.; et al (October 2024, Physical Review C)
3. Evaluation of the ${}^{35}\mathrm{K}(p,\gamma ){}^{36}\mathrm{Ca}$ reaction rate using the ${}^{37}\mathrm{Ca}(p,d){}^{36}\mathrm{Ca}$ transfer reaction

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.055809  

   Lalanne, L.; Sorlin, O.; Assié, M.; Hammache, F.; de Séréville, N.; Koyama, S.; Suzuki, D.; Flavigny, F.; Beaumel, D.; Blumenfeld, Y.; et al (May 2021, Physical Review C)

   null (Ed.)
4. Measurement of the ${}^{25}\mathrm{Al}(d,n){}^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ reaction and impact on the ${}^{25}\mathrm{Al}(p,\gamma ){}^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ reaction rate

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.065804  

   Temanson, E; Baker, J; Baby, L T; Hanselman, K; Höflich, P; Kuvin, S A; McCann, G W; Volya, A; Wiedenhöver, I (December 2023, Physical Review C)
5. $R$ -matrix analyses for the ${}^7\mathrm{Li}(t,n){}^9\mathrm{Be}$ and ${}^7\mathrm{Li}({}^3\mathrm{He},p){}^9\mathrm{Be}$ reactions and their improved thermonuclear reaction rates

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.045802  

   Hu, J.; Tian, N.; Li, Y. Y.; Hou, S. Q.; Xu, S. W.; Liu, J. B.; Lv, J. F. (October 2022, Physical Review C)