More Like this

1. Canopy-top measurements do not accurately quantify canopy-scale leaf thermoregulation

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301914120  

   Garen, Josef C.; Aparecido, Luiza Maria; Blonder, Benjamin W.; Cavaleri, Molly A.; Slot, Martijn; Michaletz, Sean T. (April 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
2. Canopy arthropod responses to repeated canopy opening in a wet tropical forest

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4177  

   Pandey, Manoj; Schowalter, Timothy D. (August 2022, Ecosphere)

   Abstract With predictions of increased frequency of intense hurricanes, it is increasingly crucial to understand how biotic and abiotic components of forests will be affected. This study describes canopy arthropod responses to repeated experimental and natural canopy opening at the Luquillo Experimental Forest Long‐term Ecological Research Site (LTER) in Puerto Rico. The canopy trimming experiment (CTE1) treatments were started in 2004, and a second trimming (CTE2) was conducted in 2014, to study effects of increased hurricane frequency at the site. Paired disturbed plots with canopy trimmed (trim) and undisturbed plots with no trimming (no trim) were replicated in three experimental blocks. Arthropods were sampled by bagging branches on seven representative early and late successional overstory and understory tree species annually from 2004 to 2009 for CTE1 and 2015 to 2019 for CTE2. In addition to the experimental manipulation, the CTE site was disturbed by Hurricane Maria (Category 4) in September 2017, providing an additional natural canopy opening to the experiment. We evaluated the effect of the second experimental trimming, compared canopy arthropod responses to the three canopy‐opening events, and compared the effects of experimental trimming and natural canopy opening by Hurricane Maria. The second experimental canopy trimming produced canopy arthropod responses consistent with hurricane disturbances, with sap‐sucking herbivores increasing in abundance on the trimmed plots, whereas other functional groups generally declined in abundance in disturbed plots. Responses to the first and second trimmings were generally similar. However, Hurricane Maria exacerbated the responses, indicating the likely effect of increased hurricane frequency and intensity. 

   more » « less
3. Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002237  

   Butler, Ethan_E; Chen, Ming; Ricciuto, Daniel; Flores‐Moreno, Habacuc; Wythers, Kirk_R; Kattge, Jens; Thornton, Peter_E; Reich, Peter_B (October 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems)

   Abstract Transitioning across biological scales is a central challenge in land surface models. Processes that operate at the scale of individual leaves must be scaled to canopies, and this is done using dedicated submodels. Here, we focus on a submodel that prescribes how light and nitrogen are distributed through plant canopies. We found a mathematical inconsistency in a submodel implemented in the Community and Energy Land Models (CLM and ELM), which incorporates twigs, branches, stems, and dead leaves in nitrogen scaling from leaf to canopy. The inconsistency leads to unrealistic (physically impossible) values of the nitrogen scaling coefficient. The mathematical inconsistency is a general mistake, that is, would occur in any model adopting this particular submodel. We resolve the inconsistency by allowing distinct profiles of stems and branches versus living leaves. We implemented the updated scheme in the ELM and find that the correction reduces global mean gross primary production (GPP) by 3.9 Pg C (3%). Further, when stems and branches are removed from the canopy in the updated model (akin to models that ignore shading from stems), global GPP increases by 4.1 Pg C (3.2%), because of reduced shading. Hence, models that entirely ignore stem shading also introduce errors in the global spatial distribution of GPP estimates, with a strong signal in the tropics, increasing GPP there by over 200 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹. Appropriately incorporating stems and other nonphotosynthesizing material into the light and nitrogen scaling routines of global land models, will improve their biological realism and accuracy. 

   more » « less
4. Canopy effects on snow sublimation from a central Arizona Basin: Canopy Effects on Snow Sublimation

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025184  

   Svoma, Bohumil M. (January 2017, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
5. Bryophytes in fir waves: Forest canopy indicator species and functional diversity decline in canopy gaps

   https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12718  

   Berdugo, Monica B.; Dovciak, Martin; Nakashizuka, ed., Tohru (March 2019, Journal of Vegetation Science)

   Abstract AimsBryophytes can cover three quarters of the ground surface, play key ecological functions, and increase biodiversity in mesic high‐elevation conifer forests of the temperate zone. Forest gaps affect species coexistence (and ecosystem functions) as suggested by the gap and gap‐size partitioning hypotheses (GPH,G_SPH). Here we test these hypotheses in the context of high‐elevation forest bryophyte communities and their functional attributes. Study SiteSpruce–fir forests on Whiteface Mountain, NY,USA. MethodsWe characterized canopy openness, microclimate, forest floor substrates, vascular vegetation cover, and moss layer (cover, common species, and functional attributes) in three canopy openness environments (gap, gap edge, forest canopy) across 20 gaps (fir waves) (n = 60); the functional attributes were based on 16 morphologic, reproductive, and ecological bryophyte plant functional traits (PFTs). We testedGPHandG_SPHrelative to bryophyte community metrics (cover, composition), traits, and trait functional sensitivity (functional dispersion;FDis) using indicator species analysis, ordination, and regression. ResultsCanopy openness drove gradients in ground‐level temperature, substrate abundance and heterogeneity (beta diversity), and understory vascular vegetation cover. TheGPHwas consistent with (a) the abundance patterns of forest canopy indicator species (Dicranum fuscescens,Hypnum imponens, andTetraphis pellucida), and (b)FDisbased on threePFTs (growth form, fertility, and acidity), both increasing with canopy cover. We did not find support forGPHin the remaining species or traits, or forG_SPHin general; gap width (12–44 m) was not related to environmental or bryophyte community gradients. ConclusionsThe observed lack of variation in most bryophyte metrics across canopy environments suggests high resistance of the bryophyte layer to natural canopy gaps in high‐elevation forests. However, responses of forest canopy indicator species suggest that canopy mortality, potentially increased by changing climate or insect pests, may cause declines in some forest canopy species and consequently in the functional diversity of bryophyte communities. 

   more » « less