skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: Gull dynamic pitch stability is controlled by wing morphing
Birds perform astounding aerial maneuvers by actuating their shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints to morph their wing shape. This maneuverability is desirable for similar-sized uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) and can be analyzed through the lens of dynamic flight stability. Quantifying avian dynamic stability is challenging as it is dictated by aerodynamics and inertia, which must both account for birds’ complex and variable morphology. To date, avian dynamic stability across flight conditions remains largely unknown. Here, we fill this gap by quantifying how a gull can use wing morphing to adjust its longitudinal dynamic response. We found that it was necessary to adjust the shoulder angle to achieve trimmed flight and that most trimmed configurations were longitudinally stable except for configurations with high wrist angles. Our results showed that as flight speed increases, the gull could fold or sweep its wings backward to trim. Further, a trimmed gull can use its wing joints to control the frequencies and damping ratios of the longitudinal oscillatory modes. We found a more damped phugoid mode than similar-sized UAVs, possibly reducing speed sensitivity to perturbations, such as gusts. Although most configurations had controllable short-period flying qualities, the heavily damped phugoid mode indicates a sluggish response to control inputs, which may be overcome while maneuvering by morphing into an unstable flight configuration. Our study shows that gulls use their shoulder, wrist, and elbow joints to negotiate trade-offs in stability and control and points the way forward for designing UAVs with avian-like maneuverability.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1935216
NSF-PAR ID:
10378273
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume:
119
Issue:
37
ISSN:
0027-8424
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ( , Journal of The Royal Society Interface)
    null (Ed.)
    Birds dynamically adapt to disparate flight behaviours and unpredictable environments by actively manipulating their skeletal joints to change their wing shape. This in-flight adaptability has inspired many unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) wings, which predominately morph within a single geometric plane. By contrast, avian joint-driven wing morphing produces a diverse set of non-planar wing shapes. Here, we investigated if joint-driven wing morphing is desirable for UAVs by quantifying the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of gull-inspired wing-body configurations. We used a numerical lifting-line algorithm (MachUpX) to determine the aerodynamic loads across the range of motion of the elbow and wrist, which was validated with wind tunnel tests using three-dimensional printed wing-body models. We found that joint-driven wing morphing effectively controls lift, pitching moment and static margin, but other mechanisms are required to trim. Within the range of wing extension capability, specific paths of joint motion (trajectories) permit distinct longitudinal flight control strategies. We identified two unique trajectories that decoupled stability from lift and pitching moment generation. Further, extension along the trajectory inherent to the musculoskeletal linkage system produced the largest changes to the investigated aerodynamic properties. Collectively, our results show that gull-inspired joint-driven wing morphing allows adaptive longitudinal flight control and could promote multifunctional UAV designs. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ( , Nature)
    Abstract Birds morph their wing shape to accomplish extraordinary manoeuvres 1–4 , which are governed by avian-specific equations of motion. Solving these equations requires information about a bird’s aerodynamic and inertial characteristics 5 . Avian flight research to date has focused on resolving aerodynamic features, whereas inertial properties including centre of gravity and moment of inertia are seldom addressed. Here we use an analytical method to determine the inertial characteristics of 22 species across the full range of elbow and wrist flexion and extension. We find that wing morphing allows birds to substantially change their roll and yaw inertia but has a minimal effect on the position of the centre of gravity. With the addition of inertial characteristics, we derived a novel metric of pitch agility and estimated the static pitch stability, revealing that the agility and static margin ranges are reduced as body mass increases. These results provide quantitative evidence that evolution selects for both stable and unstable flight, in contrast to the prevailing narrative that birds are evolving away from stability 6 . This comprehensive analysis of avian inertial characteristics provides the key features required to establish a theoretical model of avian manoeuvrability. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ( , Bioinspiration biomimetics)
    null (Ed.)
    Gliding birds perform feats that challenge even our most advanced similar-sized unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Their ostensible skill supports a pervasive belief that birds are highly efficient gliders that outperform modern UAVs. which led us to ask: are gliding birds truly more efficient than UAVs? Avian flight efficiency a well-studied topic and often cited as the inspiration for novel UAV designs. Despite the multitude of studies that have quantified the aerodynamic efficiency of gliding birds, there is no comprehensive summary of their findings. This is problematic because differing methodologies have inconsistent levels of uncertainty. As such, the lack of consolidated information on gliding bird efficiency inhibits a true comparison to UAVs. To fill this gap, we surveyed published theoretical and experimental estimates of avian aerodynamic efficiency and investigated the uncertainty of each method. We found that there was substantial variation in the aerodynamic efficiency predicted by different methods, which can lead to disparate conclusions on gliding bird efficiency. Our survey showed that measurements on live birds gliding in wind tunnels provide a reliable minimum estimate on a birds’ aerodynamic efficiency and allows the quantification of the wing configurations used in flight. Next, we surveyed the aeronautical literature to collect all published aerodynamic efficiencies of similar-sized, non-copter UAVs. The consolidated information allowed a direct comparison of modern UAVs and gliding birds. Contrary to our expectation, we found that there is no definitive evidence that any gliding bird species is either more or less efficient than a similar-sized UAV. This non-result highlights a critical need for new technology and analytical advances that can reduce the uncertainty associated with estimating a gliding bird’s aerodynamic efficiency. Nevertheless, our survey indicated that UAV designs informed by species flying within subcritical regimes may extend their operational range into lower Reynolds number regimes. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ( , Communications Engineering)
    Abstract

    Uncrewed aerial vehicles are integral to a smart city framework, but the dynamic environments above and within urban settings are dangerous for autonomous flight. Wind gusts caused by the uneven landscape jeopardize safe and effective aircraft operation. Birds rapidly reject gusts by changing their wing shape, but current gust alleviation methods for aircraft still use discrete control surfaces. Additionally, modern gust alleviation controllers challenge small uncrewed aerial vehicle power constraints by relying on extensive sensing networks and computationally expensive modeling. Here we show end-to-end deep reinforcement learning forgoing state inference to efficiently alleviate gusts on a smart material camber-morphing wing. In a series of wind tunnel gust experiments at the University of Michigan, trained controllers reduced gust impact by 84% from on-board pressure signals. Notably, gust alleviation using signals from only three pressure taps was statistically indistinguishable from using six pressure tap signals. By efficiently rejecting environmental perturbations, reduced-sensor fly-by-feel controllers open the door to small uncrewed aerial vehicle missions in cities.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Scientific Reports)
    Abstract

    Small cursorial birds display remarkable walking skills and can negotiate complex and unstructured terrains with ease. The neuromechanical control strategies necessary to adapt to these challenging terrains are still not well understood. Here, we analyzed the 2D- and 3D pelvic and leg kinematic strategies employed by the common quail to negotiate visible steps (upwards and downwards) of about 10%, and 50% of their leg length. We used biplanar fluoroscopy to accurately describe joint positions in three dimensions and performed semi-automatic landmark localization using deep learning. Quails negotiated the vertical obstacles without major problems and rapidly regained steady-state locomotion. When coping with step upwards, the quail mostly adapted the trailing limb to permit the leading leg to step on the elevated substrate similarly as it did during level locomotion. When negotiated steps downwards, both legs showed significant adaptations. For those small and moderate step heights that did not induce aerial running, the quail kept the kinematic pattern of the distal joints largely unchanged during uneven locomotion, and most changes occurred in proximal joints. The hip regulated leg length, while the distal joints maintained the spring-damped limb patterns. However, to negotiate the largest visible steps, more dramatic kinematic alterations were observed. There all joints contributed to leg lengthening/shortening in the trailing leg, and both the trailing and leading legs stepped more vertically and less abducted. In addition, locomotion speed was decreased. We hypothesize a shift from a dynamic walking program to more goal-directed motions that might be focused on maximizing safety.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email