skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: CO2 surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
Fluctuations in atmospheric CO2 can be measured with great precision and are used to identify human-driven sources as well as natural cycles of ocean and land carbon. One source of variability is the stratosphere, where the influx of aged CO2-depleted air can produce fluctuations at the surface. This process has been speculated to be a potential source of interannual variability (IAV) in CO2 that might obscure the quantification of other sources of IAV. Given the recent success in demonstrating that the stratospheric influx of N2O- and chlorofluorocarbon-depleted air is a dominant source of their surface IAV in the Southern Hemisphere, I apply the same model and measurement analysis here to CO2. Using chemistry-transport modeling or scaling of the observed N2O variability, I find that the stratosphere-driven surface variability in CO2 is at most 10% of the observed IAV and is not an important source. Diagnosing the amplitude of the CO2 annual cycle and its increase from 1985 to 2021 through the annual variance gives rates similar to traditional methods in the Northern Hemisphere (BRW, MLO) but can identify the emergence of small trends (0.08 ppm per decade) in the Southern Hemisphere (SMO, CGO).  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2135749
PAR ID:
10378448
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Editor(s):
Ning Zeng
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Earth system dynamics
Volume:
13
ISSN:
2190-4979
Page Range / eLocation ID:
703-709
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. Stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) is an important source oftropospheric ozone, affecting all of atmospheric chemistry, climate, and air quality. The study of impacts needs STE fluxes to be resolved by latitude and month, and for this, we rely on global chemistry models, whose results diverge greatly. Overall, we lack guidance from model–measurement metrics that inform us about processes and patterns related to the STE flux of ozone (O3). In this work, we use modeled tracers (N2O and CFCl3), whose distributions and budgets can be constrained by satellite and surfaceobservations, allowing us to follow stratospheric signals across thetropopause. The satellite-derived photochemical loss of N2O on annualand quasi-biennial cycles can be matched by the models. The STE flux ofN2O-depleted air in our chemistry transport model drives surfacevariability that closely matches observed fluctuations on both annual andquasi-biennial cycles, confirming the modeled flux. The observed tracercorrelations between N2O and O3 in the lowermost stratosphereprovide a hemispheric scaling of the N2O STE flux to that ofO3. For N2O and CFCl3, we model greater southern hemisphericSTE fluxes, a result supported by some metrics, but counter to the prevailing theory of wave-driven stratospheric circulation. The STE flux of O3, however, is predominantly northern hemispheric, but evidence shows that this is caused by the Antarctic ozone hole reducing southern hemispheric O3 STE by 14 %. Our best estimate of the current STE O3 flux based on a range of constraints is 400 Tg(O3) yr−1, with a 1σ uncertainty of ±15 % and with a NH : SH ratio ranging from 50:50 to 60:40. We identify a range of observational metrics that can better constrain the modeled STE O3 flux in future assessments. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions)
    Abstract. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas emitted by oceanic and terrestrial sources, with its biogeochemical cycle influenced by both natural processes and anthropogenic activities. Current atmospheric N2O monitoring networks, including tall-tower and flask measurements, often overlook major marine hotspots, such as the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. We present the first 15 months of high-frequency continuous measurements of N2O and carbon monoxide from the newly established Galapagos Emissions Monitoring Station (GEMS) in this region. Over this period, N2O mole fractions vary by approximately 5 ppb, influenced by seasonal trade winds, local anthropogenic emissions, and air masses transported from marine N2O hotspots. Notably, between February and April 2024, we observe high variability linked to the southward shift of the intertropical convergence zone and weakened trade winds over the Galapagos Islands. Increased variability during this period is driven by stagnant local winds, which accumulate emissions, and the mixing of air masses with different N2O content from the northern and southern hemispheres. The remaining variability is primarily due to differences in air mass transport and heterogeneity in surface fluxes from the eastern tropical Pacific. Air masses passing over the Peruvian and Chilean upwelling systems— key sources of oceanic N2O efflux — show markedly higher N2O mole fractions at the GEMS station. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences)
    Abstract The El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the equatorial Pacific is the dominant mode of global air‐sea carbon dioxide (CO2) flux interannual variability (IAV). Air‐sea CO2fluxes are driven by the difference between atmospheric and surface ocean pCO2, with variability of the latter driving flux variability. Previous studies found that models in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) failed to reproduce the observed ENSO‐related pattern of CO2fluxes and had weak pCO2IAV, which were explained by both weak upwelling IAV and weak mean vertical dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) gradients. We assess whether the latest generation of CMIP6 models can reproduce equatorial Pacific pCO2IAV by validating models against observations‐based data products. We decompose pCO2IAV into thermally and non‐thermally driven anomalies to examine the balance between these competing anomalies, which explain the total pCO2IAV. The majority of CMIP6 models underestimate pCO2IAV, while they overestimate sea surface temperature IAV. Insufficient compensation of non‐thermal pCO2to thermal pCO2IAV in models results in weak total pCO2IAV. We compare the relative strengths of the vertical transport of temperature and DIC and evaluate their contributions to thermal and non‐thermal pCO2anomalies. Model‐to‐observations‐based product comparisons reveal that modeled mean vertical DIC gradients are biased weak relative to their mean vertical temperature gradients, but upwelling acting on these gradients is insufficient to explain the relative magnitudes of thermal and non‐thermal pCO2anomalies. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; (, Biogeosciences)
    The prediction of atmospheric CO2 concentrations is limited by the high interannual variability (IAV) in terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). However, there are large uncertainties in the drivers of GPP IAV among Earth system models (ESMs). Here, we evaluate the impact of these uncertainties on the predictability of atmospheric CO2 in six ESMs. We use regression analysis to determine the role of environmental drivers in (i) the patterns of GPP IAV and (ii) the predictability of GPP. There are large uncertainties in the spatial distribution of GPP IAV. Although all ESMs agree on the high IAV in the tropics, several ESMs have unique hotspots of GPP IAV. The main driver of GPP IAV is temperature in the ESMs using the Community Land Model, whereas it is soil moisture in the ESM developed by the Institute Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL-CM6A-LR) and in the low-resolution configuration of the Max Planck Earth System Model (MPI-ESM-LR), revealing underlying differences in the source of GPP IAV among ESMs. Between 13 % and 24 % of the GPP IAV is predictable 1 year ahead, with four out of six ESMs showing values of between 19 % and 24 %. Up to 32 % of the GPP IAV induced by soil moisture is predictable, whereas only 7 % to 13 % of the GPP IAV induced by radiation is predictable. The results show that, while ESMs are fairly similar in their ability to predict their own carbon flux variability, these predicted contributions to the atmospheric CO2 variability originate from different regions and are caused by different drivers. A higher coherence in atmospheric CO2 predictability could be achieved by reducing uncertainties in the GPP sensitivity to soil moisture and by accurate observational products for GPP IAV. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Global Change Biology)
    Abstract Terrestrial ecosystems contribute most of the interannual variability (IAV) in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, but processes driving the IAV of net ecosystem CO2exchange (NEE) remain elusive. For a predictive understanding of the global C cycle, it is imperative to identify indicators associated with ecological processes that determine the IAV of NEE. Here, we decompose the annual NEE of global terrestrial ecosystems into their phenological and physiological components, namely maximum carbon uptake (MCU) and release (MCR), the carbon uptake period (CUP), and two parameters, α and β, that describe the ratio between actual versus hypothetical maximum C sink and source, respectively. Using long‐term observed NEE from 66 eddy covariance sites and global products derived from FLUXNET observations, we found that the IAV of NEE is determined predominately by MCU at the global scale, which explains 48% of the IAV of NEE on average while α, CUP, β, and MCR explain 14%, 25%, 2%, and 8%, respectively. These patterns differ in water‐limited ecosystems versus temperature‐ and radiation‐limited ecosystems; 31% of the IAV of NEE is determined by the IAV of CUP in water‐limited ecosystems, and 60% of the IAV of NEE is determined by the IAV of MCU in temperature‐ and radiation‐limited ecosystems. The Lund‐Potsdam‐Jena (LPJ) model and the Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Inter‐comparison Project (MsTMIP) models underestimate the contribution of MCU to the IAV of NEE by about 18% on average, and overestimate the contribution of CUP by about 25%. This study provides a new perspective on the proximate causes of the IAV of NEE, which suggest that capturing the variability of MCU is critical for modeling the IAV of NEE across most of the global land surface. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email