skip to main content


Title: Optimal stacking of noise cross-correlation functions
SUMMARY

Cross-correlations of ambient seismic noise are widely used for seismic velocity imaging, monitoring and ground motion analyses. A typical step in analysing noise cross-correlation functions (NCFs) is stacking short-term NCFs over longer time periods to increase the signal quality. Spurious NCFs could contaminate the stack, degrade its quality and limit its use. Many methods have been developed to improve the stacking of coherent waveforms, including earthquake waveforms, receiver functions and NCFs. This study systematically evaluates and compares the performance of eight stacking methods, including arithmetic mean or linear stacking, robust stacking, selective stacking, cluster stacking, phase-weighted stacking, time–frequency phase-weighted stacking, Nth-root stacking and averaging after applying an adaptive covariance filter. Our results demonstrate that, in most cases, all methods can retrieve clear ballistic or first arrivals. However, they yield significant differences in preserving the phase and amplitude information. This study provides a practical guide for choosing the optimal stacking method for specific research applications in ambient noise seismology. We evaluate the performance using multiple onshore and offshore seismic arrays in the Pacific Northwest region. We compare these stacking methods for NCFs calculated from raw ambient noise (referred to as Raw NCFs) and from ambient noise normalized using a one-bit clipping time normalization method (referred to as One-bit NCFs). We evaluate six metrics, including signal-to-noise ratios, phase dispersion images, convergence rate, temporal changes in the ballistic and coda waves, relative amplitude decays with distance and computational time. We show that robust stacking is the best choice for all applications (velocity tomography, monitoring and attenuation studies) using Raw NCFs. For applications using One-bit NCFs, all methods but phase-weighted and Nth-root stacking are good choices for seismic velocity tomography. Linear, robust and selective stacking methods are all equally appropriate choices when using One-bit NCFs for monitoring applications. For applications relying on accurate relative amplitudes, the linear, robust, selective and cluster stacking methods all perform well with One-bit NCFs. The evaluations in this study can be generalized to a broad range of time-series analysis that utilizes data coherence to perform ensemble stacking. Another contribution of this study is the accompanying open-source software package, StackMaster, which can be used for general purposes of time-series stacking.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10379491
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Oxford University Press
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Geophysical Journal International
Volume:
232
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0956-540X
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: p. 1600-1618
Size(s):
p. 1600-1618
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Typical use of ambient noise interferometry focuses on longer period (>1 s) waves for exploration of subsurface structure and other applications, while very shallow structure and some environmental seismology applications may benefit from use of shorter period (<1 s) waves. We explore the potential for short‐period ambient noise interferometry to determine shallow seismic velocity structures by comparing two methodologies, the conventional amplitude‐based cross‐correlation and linear stacking (TCC‐Lin) and a more recently developed phase cross‐correlation and time‐frequency phase‐weighted‐stacking (PCC‐PWS) method with both synthetic and real data collected in a heterogeneous karst aquifer system. Our results suggest that the PCC‐PWS method is more effective in extracting short‐period wave velocities than the TCC‐Lin method, especially when using data collected in regions containing complex shallow structures such as the karst aquifer system investigated here. In addition to the different methodologies for computing the cross correlation functions, we also examine the relative importance of signal‐to‐noise ratio and number of wavelengths propagating between station pairs to determine data/solution quality. We find that the lower number of wavelengths of 3 has the greatest impact on the network‐averaged group velocity curve. Lastly, we test the sensitivity of the number of stacks used to create the final empirical Green's function, and find that the PCC‐PWS method required about half the number of cross‐correlation functions to develop reliable velocity curves compared to the TCC‐Lin method. This is an important advantage of the PCC‐PWS method when available data collection time is limited.

     
    more » « less
  2. The structure of the Antarctic crust is important to our understanding of processes occurring within the Antarctic cryosphere as well as to the Earth’s response to ice mass loss. With the increase in geophysical studies of Antarctica, crustal structure has become much better defined beneath many regions. Several crustal models have been created from seismic-derived and/or gravity-derived data, and some of these models incorporate sets of crustal receiver functions either as a priori constraints or to validate model results. However, receiver function constraints do not exist throughout large regions of Antarctica due to a lack of seismic coverage; given this, we search for additional metrics by which we can compare and contrast Earth models. One approach that has been utilized for other continents is to forward model accurate synthetic waveforms through existing seismic velocity models to identify which models most accurately reproduce seismic waveform datasets. Such waveform datasets may come from accurately determined seismic events or from ambient seismic noise. In an effort to assess existing Antarctic crustal models using a different metric to identify regions where crustal structure is still most uncertain, we have collected a suite of available seismic- and gravity-derived Antarctic crustal models. In the absence of accurately determined ‘ground-truthed’ seismic events in Antarctica, we use a frequency-time normalization approach to extract Rayleigh waves from ambient seismic noise, with periods of 15-55 seconds that are sensitive to crustal structure. We split the observations into two separate validation datasets. The first dataset includes all station-station cross-correlations, with at least one seismic station in each pair that has not been previously used to constrain prior tomographic inversions (a true validation dataset), and the second dataset includes all available station-station cross-correlations, including those that may have been used to constrain some of the models we are testing. We construct sets of Earth models from the available crustal models underlain by two different upper mantle models. We forward model synthetic waveforms using a finite difference approach through each of the Earth models and measure the phase delays between the synthetic waveforms and the ambient seismic noise dataset. Results from our waveform validation study and identification of the poorly characterized regions of Antarctic crust are forthcoming and will be presented. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    As new techniques exploiting the Earth's ambient seismic noise field are developed and applied, such as for the observation of temporal changes in seismic velocity structure, it is crucial to quantify the precision with which wave‐type measurements can be made. This work uses array data at the Homestake mine in Lead, South Dakota, and an array at Sweetwater, Texas, to consider two aspects that control this precision: the types of seismic wave contributing to the ambient noise field at microseism frequencies and the effect of array geometry. Both are quantified using measurements of wavefield coherence between stations in combination with Wiener filters. We find a strong seasonal change between body‐wave and surface‐wave content. Regarding the inclusion of underground stations, we quantify the lower limit to which the ambient noise field can be characterized and reproduced; the applications of the Wiener filters are about 4 times more successful in reproducing ambient noise waveforms when underground stations are included in the array, resulting in predictions of seismic time series with less than a 1% residual, and are ultimately limited by the geometry and aperture of the array, as well as by temporal variations in the seismic field. We discuss the implications of these results for the geophysics community performing ambient seismic noise studies, as well as for the cancellation of seismic Newtonian gravity noise in ground‐based, sub‐Hertz, gravitational‐wave detectors.

     
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    SUMMARY Estimation of ambient seismic source distributions (e.g. location and strength) can aid studies of seismic source mechanisms and subsurface structure investigations. One can invert for the ambient seismic (noise) source distribution by applying full-waveform inversion (FWI) theory to seismic (noise) crosscorrelations. This estimation method is especially applicable for seismic recordings without obvious body-wave arrivals. Data pre-processing procedures are needed before the inversion, but some pre-processing procedures commonly used in ambient noise tomography can bias the ambient (noise) source distribution estimation and should not be used in FWI. Taking this into account, we propose a complete workflow from the raw seismic noise recording through pre-processing procedures to the inversion. We present the workflow with a field data example in Hartoušov, Czech Republic, where the seismic sources are CO2 degassing areas at Earth’s surface (i.e. a fumarole or mofette). We discuss factors in the processing and inversion that can bias the estimations, such as inaccurate velocity model, anelasticity and array sensitivity. The proposed workflow can work for multicomponent data across different scales of field data. 
    more » « less
  5. SUMMARY

    Seismograms contain multiple sources of seismic waves, from distinct transient signals such as earthquakes to continuous ambient seismic vibrations such as microseism. Ambient vibrations contaminate the earthquake signals, while the earthquake signals pollute the ambient noise’s statistical properties necessary for ambient-noise seismology analysis. Separating ambient noise from earthquake signals would thus benefit multiple seismological analyses. This work develops a multitask encoder–decoder network named WaveDecompNet to separate transient signals from ambient signals directly in the time domain for 3-component seismograms. We choose the active-volcanic Big Island in Hawai’i as a natural laboratory given its richness in transients (tectonic and volcanic earthquakes) and diffuse ambient noise (strong microseism). The approach takes a noisy 3-component seismogram as input and independently predicts the 3-component earthquake and noise waveforms. The model is trained on earthquake and noise waveforms from the STandford EArthquake Dataset (STEAD) and on the local noise of seismic station IU.POHA. We estimate the network’s performance by using the explained variance metric on both earthquake and noise waveforms. We explore different neural network designs for WaveDecompNet and find that the model with long-short-term memory (LSTM) performs best over other structures. Overall, we find that WaveDecompNet provides satisfactory performance down to a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 0.1. The potential of the method is (1) to improve broad-band SNR of transient (earthquake) waveforms and (2) to improve local ambient noise to monitor the Earth’s structure using ambient noise signals. To test this, we apply a short-time average to a long-time average filter and improve the number of detected events. We also measure single-station cross-correlation functions of the recovered ambient noise and establish their improved coherence through time and over different frequency bands. We conclude that WaveDecompNet is a promising tool for a broad range of seismological research.

     
    more » « less