More Like this

1. Energy dissipation by grain boundary replacement during grain growth

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115405  

   Xu, Zipeng; Hefferan, Christopher M.; Li, Shiu Fai; Lind, Jonathan; Suter, Robert M.; Abdeljawad, Fadi; Rohrer, Gregory S. (June 2023, Scripta Materialia)
2. Impact of grain boundary energy anisotropy on grain growth

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.093403  

   Naghibzadeh, S Kiana; Xu, Zipeng; Kinderlehrer, David; Suter, Robert; Dayal, Kaushik; Rohrer, Gregory S (September 2024, Physical Review Materials)
3. Impact of grain boundary energy anisotropy on grain growth

   Naghibzadeh, Kiana; Xu, Zipeng; Kinderlehrer, David; Suter, Robert; Dayal, Kaushik; Rohrer, Gregory (September 2024, Physical review materials)
4. Grain incompatibility determines the local structure of amorphous grain boundary complexions

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118599  

   Garg, Pulkit; Rupert, Timothy J. (January 2023, Acta Materialia)
5. Comparison of simulated and measured grain volume changes during grain growth

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.033402  

   Peng, Xiaoyao; Bhattacharya, Aditi; Naghibzadeh, S. Kiana; Kinderlehrer, David; Suter, Robert; Dayal, Kaushik; Rohrer, Gregory S. (March 2022, Physical review materials)

   The three-dimensional microstructure of Ni, observed after five annealing intervals, was compared to simulations of grain growth using the threshold dynamics method with the assumption of capillarity as the only driving force. A grain-by-grain comparison made it possible to identify the sources of differences between the simulation and experiment. The most significant difference was for grains of the smallest sizes, which the simulation predicted would lose volume and disappear at a greater rate than observed in the experiment. The loss of grains created errors in the numbers of neighbors of the remaining grains, and it was found that errors in the simulated grain volume were correlated to errors in the number of near neighbors. While anisotropic grain boundary properties likely play a role in the differences, the size dependence of the errors suggest that it might be necessary to include a size dependence in the model for grain boundary migration kinetics. 

   more » « less