More Like this

1. Micro-engineering and nano-engineering approaches to investigate tumour ecosystems

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-023-00593-3  

   Kim, Mijin; Panagiotakopoulou, Magdalini; Chen, Chen; Ruiz, Stephen B; Ganesh, Karuna; Tammela, Tuomas; Heller, Daniel A (September 2023, Nature Reviews Cancer)
2. Factors Motivating Engineering Faculty to Adopt and Teach New Engineering Technologies

   https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637235  

   Jarvie-Eggart, Michelle; Owusu-Ansah, Alfred; Stockero, Shari L. (January 2021, 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE))

   This work-in-progress paper shares preliminary results from a research project that addresses three primary objectives: (1) to develop a conceptual model of technology adoption among engineering faculty through qualitative interview research; (2) to propose an adaption of existing models for technology adoption with appropriate constructs for engineering faculty; and (3) to propose one or more specific interventions to increase faculty adoption of new engineering technologies. In this paper, we focus primarily on the work in progress to meet the first objective. Specifically, we highlight how our preliminary findings about the factors affecting technology adoption, identified from interviews with engineering faculty, align with or differ from factors in previous models for technology adoption. Subjective norm, voluntariness, utility, technology cost, and facilitating conditions, were all preliminary factors found in our data that align at least somewhat with constructs from previous models [1], [2]. Time, access to the technology, efficiency/ease of work, and self regulation are factors that we have identified which are absent from the most widely applied models of technology adoption. We consider what our findings might imply in engineering education contexts. 

   more » « less
3. Engineering strategies to optimize lignocellulosic biorefineries

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00247-5  

   Long, Bin; Zhang, Fuzhong; Dai, Susie Y; Foston, Marcus; Tang, Yinjie J; Yuan, Joshua S (March 2025, Nature Reviews Bioengineering)
4. Assessing Global Engagement Interventions to Advance Global Engineering Competence for Engineering Formation

   Schneider, S. (June 2023, Review directory American Society for Engineering Education)

   An increasingly global environment expects graduating Engineering students to perform, live and work across cultures. Most intercultural competence research and associated global engineering education is focused on developing the global engineering skill set through long-term travel experiences such as study abroad programs. These programs can be expensive from both a time and money standpoint, limiting the participation to more privileged members of a community, and are not scalable to support broader participation. This work-in-progress addresses this research gap by focusing on the development of the students’ global learner mindset without requiring extensive travel. The project will investigate four different global engagement interventions, including the use of engineering case studies, the intentional formation of multi-national student teams, a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) research project, and a community engaged project within a short course. These interventions can be used to develop a holistic global learner mindset and global engineering education approach to foster global competence in undergraduate engineering students. The four global engagement interventions will be grounded in the global engineering competency (GEC) theoretical framework and assessed for their ability to foster a global learner mindset in engineering students. A mixed-methods approach will be used to assess students’ global learner mindset and skill set. This research will use the Global Engagement Survey (GES), the Global Engineering Competency Scale (GECS) and specific questions developed by the researchers to evaluate improvements in the participating students’ global engineering skill set and answer specific research questions including: 1) To what extent can global competence be developed in engineering students through the use of the proposed global engagement interventions; and 2) what are the relative strengths of each of the proposed global engagement interventions in developing global engineering competence? Combined, these research measures will provide both an accurate picture of how each global engagement intervention impacts the formation of a global learner mindset in engineering education, and also its associated ability to develop and/or improve global engineering skills. The outcomes of this study will generate valuable knowledge to understand how each global engagement intervention impacts the formation of global engineering competence. In this work-in-progress study, the authors discuss the four global engagement interventions with specific learning objectives that have been mapped to the overall student outcomes for the project. These objectives have also been mapped to the GES and GECS instruments. Finally the faculty members have developed qualitative tools to augment the GES and GECS to identify the global engineering skill sets each intervention is generating. This paper lays the foundation before implementing the interventions and performing their associated assessments over the several subsequent semesters. 

   more » « less
5. From Arteries to Capillaries: Approaches to Engineering Human Vasculature

   https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910811  

   Fleischer, Sharon; Tavakol, Daniel_Naveed; Vunjak‐Novakovic, Gordana (June 2020, Advanced Functional Materials)

   Abstract From microscaled capillaries to millimeter‐sized vessels, human vasculature spans multiple scales and cell types. The convergence of bioengineering, materials science, and stem cell biology has enabled tissue engineers to recreate the structure and function of different hierarchical levels of the vascular tree. Engineering large‐scale vessels aims to replace damaged arteries, arterioles, and venules and their routine application in the clinic may become a reality in the near future. Strategies to engineer meso‐ and microvasculature are extensively explored to generate models for studying vascular biology, drug transport, and disease progression as well as for vascularizing engineered tissues for regenerative medicine. However, bioengineering tissues for transplantation has failed to result in clinical translation due to the lack of proper integrated vasculature for effective oxygen and nutrient delivery. The development of strategies to generate multiscale vascular networks and their direct anastomosis to host vasculature would greatly benefit this formidable goal. In this review, design considerations and technologies for engineering millimeter‐, meso‐, and microscale vessels are discussed. Examples of recent state‐of‐the‐art strategies to engineer multiscale vasculature are also provided. Finally, key challenges limiting the translation of vascularized tissues are identified and perspectives on future directions for exploration are presented. 

   more » « less