Tang, G., Savić, M., Satyam, V.R., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). “The reason why I didn’t like [math] before is because I never felt creative”: Affective Outcomes from Teaching Actions to Foster Mathematical Creativity in Calculus 1.
Title: Tang, G., Savić, M., Satyam, V.R., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). “The reason why I didn’t like [math] before is because I never felt creative”: Affective Outcomes from Teaching Actions to Foster Mathematical Creativity in Calculus 1.
In this paper, we describe the student-reported affective outcomes from teaching actions of professors involved in a professional development experience to explicitly value creativity in their Calculus 1 courses. Using the four main teaching themes that emerged (Task-Related, Inquiry Teaching, Teacher-Centered, and Holistic Teaching), we further explored the data for affective outcomes resulting from teaching actions that foster student creativity. We observed five distinct affective outcomes: Enjoyment, Confidence, Comfort, Negative then Positive Feelings, and Negative Feelings. Enjoyment and Confidence were the most reported affective outcomes from the creativity-fostering teaching actions. Particularly, Enjoyment was reported the most from Holistic Teaching and Task-Related teaching actions; Confidence was reported the most from Holistic Teaching actions among all the types. Finally, we offer concrete creativity-based teaching actions that have the capacity to build students’ mathematical enjoyment and confidence. more »« less
Satyam, V.R.
(, Proceedings of the 24rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education)
S. Karunakaran, Z. Reed
(Ed.)
Fostering mathematical creativity in the classroom requires intentional actions on the part of the instructor. We examine the teaching actions that students in a creativity-based Calculus I course report as contributing to their sense of creativity. Based on interview data, we found the four overall types of teaching actions: Task-Related, Teaching-Centered, Inquiry Teaching, and Holistic Teaching. We discuss subtypes as well as concrete actions, to provide actionable steps practitioners can take to foster students’ creativity.
Shehzad, U; Clarke-Midura, J; Recker, M
(, American Educational Research Association)
This paper presents a novel approach for predicting the outcomes of elementary students’ participation in computer science (CS) instruction by using exit tickets, a type of practical measure, where students provide rapid feedback on their instructional experiences. Such feedback can help teachers to inform ongoing teaching and instructional practices. We fit a Structural Equation Model to examine whether students' perceptions of enjoyment, ease, and connections between mathematics and CS in an integrated lesson predicted their affective outcomes in self-efficacy, interest, and CS identity, collected in a pre- post- survey. We found that practical measures can validly measure student experiences.
Crippen, Kent J; Evans, Gayle N; Scherer, Christine G; Spillman, Courtney
(, 2020 NARST International Conference)
This study advances our design and development goal of creating a valid and reliable observation protocol for science and engineering practices (SEPs) experienced by participants working in research laboratories under the auspices of RET. This protocol offers the potential for addressing persistent questions related to participant experience by looking inside the blackbox of apprenticed professional research practice. Framed by cognitive apprenticeship and situated in an engineering RET for K-5 teachers (EEC-1711543), we independently document the SEPs which were consistently experienced across contexts and thus define a generalized teacher experience. Further, we identify key associations among the teacher's perception of their work, an independent observation and that reported by their graduate student mentors. Findings indicate that perception of involvement with any particular practice and not actual experience was a more important predictor of confidence. Perhaps most striking was the negative relationship between teacher confidence when working with mentors (r=-.242), which is similarly described by the mentors for working with teachers (r=-.356). This implies a strong need for further work and support for helping these individuals to understand each other’s goals and perspectives and for finding a way to work together that generates mutual feelings of confidence and satisfaction.
Harrison, A
(, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Educational Data Mining)
A significant amount of research has illustrated the impact of student emotional and affective state on learning outcomes. Just as human teachers and tutors often adapt instruction to accommodate changes in student affect, the ability for computer-based systems to similarly become affect-aware, detecting and personalizing instruction in response to student affective state, could significantly improve student learning. Personalized and affective interventions in tutoring systems can be realized through affect-aware learning technologies to deter students from practicing poor learning behaviors in response to negative affective states and to optimize the amount of learning that occurs over time. In this paper, we build off previous work in affect detection within intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) by applying two methodologies to develop sensor-free models of student affect with only data recorded from middle-school students interacting with an ITS. We develop models of four affective states to evaluate and determine significant predictors of affect. Namely, we develop a model which discerns students’ reported interest significantly better than majority class.
Gin, Logan E.; Wiesenthal, Nicholas J.; Ferreira, Isabella; Cooper, Katelyn M.
(, CBE—Life Sciences Education)
Gardner, Grant Ean
(Ed.)
Graduate students are more than six times as likely to experience depression compared with the general population. However, few studies have examined how graduate school specifically affects depression. In this qualitative interview study of 50 life sciences PhD students from 28 institutions, we examined how research and teaching affect depression in PhD students and how depression in turn affects students’ experiences teaching and researching. Using inductive coding, we identified factors that either positively or negatively affected student depression. Graduate students more commonly mentioned factors related to research that negatively affected their depression and factors related to teaching that positively affected their depression. We identified four overarching aspects of graduate school that influenced student depression: the amount of structure in teaching and research, positive and negative reinforcement, success and failure, and social support and isolation. Graduate students reported that depression had an exclusively negative effect on their research, primarily hindering their motivation and self-confidence, but that it helped them to be more compassionate teachers. This work pinpoints specific aspects of graduate school that PhD programs can target to improve mental health among life sciences graduate students.
Tang, G. Tang, G., Savić, M., Satyam, V.R., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). “The reason why I didn’t like [math] before is because I never felt creative”: Affective Outcomes from Teaching Actions to Foster Mathematical Creativity in Calculus 1.. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10388697. Proceedings of the 24rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Boston, MA. .
Tang, G. Tang, G., Savić, M., Satyam, V.R., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). “The reason why I didn’t like [math] before is because I never felt creative”: Affective Outcomes from Teaching Actions to Foster Mathematical Creativity in Calculus 1.. Proceedings of the 24rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Boston, MA., (). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10388697.
Tang, G.
"Tang, G., Savić, M., Satyam, V.R., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). “The reason why I didn’t like [math] before is because I never felt creative”: Affective Outcomes from Teaching Actions to Foster Mathematical Creativity in Calculus 1.". Proceedings of the 24rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Boston, MA. (). Country unknown/Code not available. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10388697.
@article{osti_10388697,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {Tang, G., Savić, M., Satyam, V.R., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). “The reason why I didn’t like [math] before is because I never felt creative”: Affective Outcomes from Teaching Actions to Foster Mathematical Creativity in Calculus 1.},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10388697},
abstractNote = {In this paper, we describe the student-reported affective outcomes from teaching actions of professors involved in a professional development experience to explicitly value creativity in their Calculus 1 courses. Using the four main teaching themes that emerged (Task-Related, Inquiry Teaching, Teacher-Centered, and Holistic Teaching), we further explored the data for affective outcomes resulting from teaching actions that foster student creativity. We observed five distinct affective outcomes: Enjoyment, Confidence, Comfort, Negative then Positive Feelings, and Negative Feelings. Enjoyment and Confidence were the most reported affective outcomes from the creativity-fostering teaching actions. Particularly, Enjoyment was reported the most from Holistic Teaching and Task-Related teaching actions; Confidence was reported the most from Holistic Teaching actions among all the types. Finally, we offer concrete creativity-based teaching actions that have the capacity to build students’ mathematical enjoyment and confidence.},
journal = {Proceedings of the 24rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Boston, MA.},
author = {Tang, G.},
editor = {S. Karunakaran, Z. Reed}
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.