skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: A Roadmap to Robust Science for High-throughput Applications: The Developers’ Perspective
Scientists using the high-throughput computing (HTC) paradigm for scientific discovery rely on complex software systems and heterogeneous architectures that must deliver robust science (i.e., ensuring performance scalability in space and time; trust in technology, people, and infrastructures; and reproducible or confirmable research). Developers must overcome a variety of obstacles to pursue workflow interoperability, identify tools and libraries for robust science, port codes across different architectures, and establish trust in non-deterministic results. This poster presents recommendations to build a roadmap to overcome these challenges and enable robust science for HTC applications and workflows. The findings were collected from an international community of software developers during a Virtual World Cafe in May 2021.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2028923 2028930
PAR ID:
10392351
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
IEEE Computer Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER 2021
Page Range / eLocation ID:
807 to 808
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, 17th IEEE International Conference on eScience, eScience 2021)
    IEEE Computer Science (Ed.)
    This poster presents our first steps to define a roadmap to robust science for high-throughput applications used in scientific discovery. These applications combine multiple components into increasingly complex multi-modal workflows that are often executed in concert on heterogeneous systems. The increasing complexity hinders the ability of scientists to generate robust science (i.e., ensuring performance scalability in space and time; trust in technology, people, and infrastructures; and reproducible or confirmable research). Scientists must withstand and overcome adverse conditions such as heterogeneous and unreliable architectures at all scales (including extreme scale), rigorous testing under uncertainties, unexplainable algorithms in machine learning, and black-box methods. This poster presents findings and recommendations to build a roadmap to overcome these challenges and enable robust science. The data was collected from an international community of scientists during a virtual world cafe in February 2021 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, ACM)
    Generative AI (genAI) tools, such as ChatGPT or Copilot, are advertised to improve developer productivity and are being integrated into software development. However, misaligned trust, skepticism, and usability concerns can impede the adoption of such tools. Research also indicates that AI can be exclusionary, failing to support diverse users adequately. One such aspect of diversity is cognitive diversity -- variations in users' cognitive styles -- that leads to divergence in perspectives and interaction styles. When an individual's cognitive style is unsupported, it creates barriers to technology adoption. Therefore, to understand how to effectively integrate genAI tools into software development, it is first important to model what factors affect developers' trust and intentions to adopt genAI tools in practice? We developed a theoretically grounded statistical model to (1) identify factors that influence developers' trust in genAI tools and (2) examine the relationship between developers' trust, cognitive styles, and their intentions to use these tools in their work. We surveyed software developers (N=238) at two major global tech organizations: GitHub Inc. and Microsoft; and employed Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate our model. Our findings reveal that genAI's system/output quality, functional value, and goal maintenance significantly influence developers' trust in these tools. Furthermore, developers' trust and cognitive styles influence their intentions to use these tools in their work. We offer practical suggestions for designing genAI tools for effective use and inclusive user experience. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, IEEE)
    Generative AI (genAI) tools, such as ChatGPT or Copilot, are advertised to improve developer productivity and are being integrated into software development. However, misaligned trust, skepticism, and usability concerns can impede the adoption of such tools. Research also indicates that AI can be exclusionary, failing to support diverse users adequately. One such aspect of diversity is cognitive diversity—variations in users' cognitive styles—that leads to divergence in perspectives and interaction styles. When an individual's cognitive style is unsupported, it creates barriers to technology adoption. Therefore, to understand how to effectively integrate genAI tools into software development, it is first important to model what factors affect developers' trust and intentions to adopt genAI tools in practice? We developed a theoretically grounded statistical model to (1) identify factors that influence developers' trust in genAI tools and (2) examine the relationship between developers' trust, cognitive styles, and their intentions to use these tools in their work. We surveyed software developers (N=238) at two major global tech organizations: GitHub Inc. and Microsoft; and employed Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate our model. Our findings reveal that genAI's system/output quality, functional value, and goal maintenance significantly influence developers' trust in these tools. Furthermore, developers' trust and cognitive styles influence their intentions to use these tools in their work. We offer practical suggestions for designing genAI tools for effective use and inclusive user experience. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, ACM)
    Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models and generative AI, is emerging as a significant force in software development, offering developers powerful tools that span the entire development lifecycle. Although software engineering research has extensively studied AI tools in software development, the specific types of interactions between developers and these AI-powered tools have only recently begun to receive attention. Understanding and improving these interactions has the potential to enhance productivity, trust, and efficiency in AI-driven workflows. In this paper, we propose a taxonomy of interaction types between developers and AI tools, identifying eleven distinct interaction types, such as auto-complete code suggestions, command-driven actions, and conversational assistance. Building on this taxonomy, we outline a research agenda focused on optimizing AI interactions, improving developer control, and addressing trust and usability challenges in AI-assisted development. By establishing a structured foundation for studying developer-AI interactions, this paper aims to stimulate research on creating more effective, adaptive AI tools for software development. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, IEEE)
    Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models and generative AI, is emerging as a significant force in software development, offering developers powerful tools that span the entire development lifecycle. Although software engineering research has extensively studied AI tools in software development, the specific types of interactions between developers and these AI-powered tools have only recently begun to receive attention. Understanding and improving these interactions has the potential to enhance productivity, trust, and efficiency in AI-driven workflows. In this paper, we propose a taxonomy of interaction types between developers and AI tools, identifying eleven distinct interaction types, such as auto-complete code suggestions, command-driven actions, and conversational assistance. Building on this taxonomy, we outline a research agenda focused on optimizing AI interactions, improving developer control, and addressing trust and usability challenges in AI-assisted development. By establishing a structured foundation for studying developer-AI interactions, this paper aims to stimulate research on creating more effective, adaptive AI tools for software development. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email