skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Complexity in sign languages
Abstract Sign languages are human communication systems that are equivalent to spoken language in their capacity for information transfer, but which use a dynamic visual signal for communication. Thus, linguistic metrics of complexity, which are typically developed for linear, symbolic linguistic representation (such as written forms of spoken languages) do not translate easily into sign language analysis. A comparison of physical signal metrics, on the other hand, is complicated by the higher dimensionality (spatial and temporal) of the sign language signal as compared to a speech signal (solely temporal). Here, we review a variety of approaches to operationalizing sign language complexity based on linguistic and physical data, and identify the approaches that allow for high fidelity modeling of the data in the visual domain, while capturing linguistically-relevant features of the sign language signal.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1931861 1932547
PAR ID:
10393836
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Linguistics Vanguard
Volume:
0
Issue:
0
ISSN:
2199-174X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, PLOS ONE)
    Perlman, Marcus (Ed.)
    Longstanding cross-linguistic work on event representations in spoken languages have argued for a robust mapping between an event’s underlying representation and its syntactic encoding, such that–for example–the agent of an event is most frequently mapped to subject position. In the same vein, sign languages have long been claimed to construct signs that visually represent their meaning, i.e., signs that are iconic. Experimental research on linguistic parameters such as plurality and aspect has recently shown some of them to be visually universal in sign, i.e. recognized by non-signers as well as signers, and have identified specific visual cues that achieve this mapping. However, little is known about what makes action representations in sign language iconic, or whether and how the mapping of underlying event representations to syntactic encoding is visually apparent in the form of a verb sign. To this end, we asked what visual cues non-signers may use in evaluating transitivity (i.e., the number of entities involved in an action). To do this, we correlated non-signer judgments about transitivity of verb signs from American Sign Language (ASL) with phonological characteristics of these signs. We found that non-signers did not accurately guess the transitivity of the signs, but that non-signer transitivity judgments can nevertheless be predicted from the signs’ visual characteristics. Further, non-signers cue in on just those features that code event representations across sign languages, despite interpreting them differently. This suggests the existence of visual biases that underlie detection of linguistic categories, such as transitivity, which may uncouple from underlying conceptual representations over time in mature sign languages due to lexicalization processes. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, IEEE)
    Sign language is a complex visual language, and automatic interpretations of sign language can facilitate communication involving deaf individuals. As one of the essential components of sign language, fingerspelling connects the natural spoken languages to the sign language and expands the scale of sign language vocabulary. In practice, it is challenging to analyze fingerspelling alphabets due to their signing speed and small motion range. The usage of synthetic data has the potential of further improving fingerspelling alphabets analysis at scale. In this paper, we evaluate how different video-based human representations perform in a framework for Alphabet Generation for American Sign Language (ASL). We tested three mainstream video-based human representations: twostream inflated 3D ConvNet, 3D landmarks of body joints, and rotation matrices of body joints. We also evaluated the effect of different skeleton graphs and selected body joints. The generation process of ASL fingerspelling used a transformerbased Conditional Variational Autoencoder. To train the model, we collected ASL alphabet signing videos from 17 signers with dynamic alphabet signing. The generated alphabets were evaluated using automatic metrics of quality such as FID, and we also considered supervised metrics by recognizing the generated entries using Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks. Our experiments show that using the rotation matrices of the upper body joints and the signing hand give the best results for the generation of ASL alphabet signing. Going forward, our goal is to produce articulated fingerspelling words by combining individual alphabets learned in this work. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Frontiers in Psychology)
    The visual-gestural modality affords its users simultaneous movement of several independent articulators and thus lends itself to simultaneous encoding of information. Much research has focused on the fact that sign languages coordinate two manual articulators in addition to a range of non-manual articulators to present different types of linguistic information simultaneously, from phonological contrasts to inflection, spatial relations, and information structure. Children and adults acquiring a signed language arguably thus need to comprehend and produce simultaneous structures to a greater extent than individuals acquiring a spoken language. In this paper, we discuss the simultaneous encoding that is found in emerging and established sign languages; we also discuss places where sign languages are unexpectedly sequential. We explore potential constraints on simultaneity in cognition and motor coordination that might impact the acquisition and use of simultaneous structures. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks)
    Sign languages are used as a primary language by approximately 70 million D/deaf people world-wide. However, most communication technologies operate in spoken and written languages, creating inequities in access. To help tackle this problem, we release ASL Citizen, the first crowdsourced Isolated Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) dataset, collected with consent and containing 83,399 videos for 2,731 distinct signs filmed by 52 signers in a variety of environments. We propose that this dataset be used for sign language dictionary retrieval for American Sign Language (ASL), where a user demonstrates a sign to their webcam to retrieve matching signs from a dictionary. Through our generalizable baselines, we show that training supervised machine learning classifiers with our dataset achieves competitive performance on metrics relevant for dictionary retrieval, with 63% accuracy and a recall-at-10 of 91%, evaluated entirely on videos of users who are not present in the training or validation sets. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of linguistics)
    Does knowledge of language transfer spontaneously across language modalities? For example, do English speakers, who have had no command of a sign language, spontaneously project grammatical constraints from English to linguistic signs? Here, we address this question by examining the constraints on doubling. We first demonstrate that doubling (e.g., panana, generally, ABB) is amenable to two conflicting parses (identity vs. reduplication), depending on the level of analysis (phonology vs. morphology). We next show that speakers with no command of a sign language spontaneously project these two parses to novel ABB signs in American Sign language. Moreover, the chosen parse (for signs) is constrained by the morphology of spoken language. Hebrew speakers can project the morphological parse when doubling indicates diminution, but English speakers only do so when doubling indicates plurality, in line with the distinct morphological properties of their spoken languages. These observations suggest that doubling in speech and signs is constrained by a common set of linguistic principles that are algebraic, amodal and abstract. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email